Amanda Welling: No Last Word

This is a follow up to my previous post regarding Amanda Welling. Just like GenX, she always wants to get in the last word. Well word up Amanda, you don't get it both ways. You don't get the first and last word with me. This is also a follow up to your follow up. Do another follow up and I'll join right in. So without any further delay, let's take a look at Amanda's follow up where she aptly titles her post for me as "My Internet Stalker" despite the fact that she wrote about me first. Commented about me first. Commented on my blog(s) where-as I have never even attempted to comment on hers. She has shown, like her friend Jude, that she is stalking me. None the less, let's proceed, shall we?

In this first shot, there is a lot to cover. 

She starts it out by saying a few days ago, she wrote about her experiences with me. Forgetting to note that it was she who brought that experience about by writing about me first and so on. She also goes on to say I "freaked" out over her post. No, Amanda, I didn't freak out. I saw some lies and misinformation on your post that I felt should be cleared up. If you or anyone else wishes to write about me, then at least do so with the truth and not lies. But rest assured, your post where you call me your stalker was you freaking out. The truth is, you are my stalker and the evidence supports it. I notice you do not supply any evidence to support your claims. 

Amanda then posts a warning to her followers informing them that if they leave comments on her blog, I will take snapshots and post about it on mine. This is yes and no. Yes to the fact that if her followers insult me and lie about me and libel me, I will focus on it. However, if they didn't do this, I wouldn't give two shits. So no, just because someone leaves a comment doesn't mean I will snapshot it. Only when they come after me in their comments will I do this. You don't see my followers / supporters libeling you, do you? No, I don't think you will. There lies the difference between you and me and the comapny we keep. My followers also do not wish you or anyone else dead. You say you don't want your followers harassed for their opinion. Libeling me with lies is not an opinion. Just saying. 

She also mentions that she was getting a lot of traffic and comments on her blog posts coming from my blog after she wrote her article about me and someone linked to it in a comment from my blog. Yes she asked me to remove that link, but no I did not. Again, I wanted her posts about me off her damn blog but she sure as shit wasn't about to accommodate me with that, now did she? And again, that is her "self entitlement" that bullies like her carry around. That they can post whatever the hell they want to about me but they'll be damned if anyone can leave a link to it on my blog in the comments section. Nothing but entitlement. 

Amanda goes on to mention that there are several types of predators. That she didn't mean that I was a sexual predator. However, that was what everybody else was writing and saying and what other type of predator would she be referring to? Notice she never explains that. The bottom line is simple, any predator is basically a bad thing. I know it. She knows it. Everyone reading this knows it. So for you to defend yourself on calling me a predator Amanda is moot. You still said it. You still had no evidence to back it up. It is still libel. It is still wrong. And it is still you striking first for absolutely no effing reason at all! The more you ramble on, the more everyone sees the GenX in you. 

You mention also Amanda that you think that I think that by you coming to my blog and requesting that I remove a link someone left in the comments section to your blog is what I call you stalking and harassing me. Well, what would you call it after someone writes something about you for no reason then gets pissed off because a link was left on the blog of the person you wrote about and libeled? It is stalking and harassing. You wrote about me on your blog then you came to mine crying for me to remove a link that was left to the post about me on your effing blog. How is that not stalking me? Harassing me? Especially when you consider that in that blog post of mine, (Internet Terrorists: Ignorance Run A-muck) and even after you wrote about me, I never effing mentioned you period! Not once! 

So yeah, you are the real stalker and harasser.

And let us not forget in the previous post I wrote, "Amanda Welling: Amanda Condones Murder", I showed a screenshot of one of your comments where you threatened to bully me! And blamed me for being bullied. Those screenshots don't lie, do they? 

Yes, when you go on to say that I consider it continued harassment when you left a FAKE review of my book on my reviews, what would you call it? You didn't read the book. Your review had nothing to do with the book but retaliation and further harassment against me. There's no other way to look at it because it was uncalled for. You said in your review that I like to harass reviewers yet I have never harassed anyone period! And you have no proof to support this claim or else you would have posted it. So basically, you lied which is, in any book, harassing me. Had you actually read the book, and didn't go after me in your review with your libelous comments, then maybe we'd be singing a different tune here, now wouldn't we? 

You say you see your review as being honest about my behavior so again I will request that you present evidence that I attacked a reviewer. If you can't do that, then you are not honest, are you? And I'm not talking about one of your bully friends who also libeled me in their review or clearly didn't read the book, but an honest and unbiased reviewer. I never ever did any such thing and you have no proof to show to back up your so called honesty. 

Now let's take a look at the rest of her follow up post about me.

 She says that she doesn't think it's okay to be bullied. If this is true Amanda, then why did you threaten to bully me a year ago? Why did you even initially write about me? Why did you comment on GenXpose hate blog against me? All of this took place before I ever uttered the name Amanda Welling. How much of your bullying was you expecting me to take? 

As for you being disgusted and have no words about my rape reference, of course you're speechless, it was a good comparison to your "Carroll asked to be bullied" comment. 

Then you say that I think I know you. Well, one could say that about you where it concerns me. You think you know me so you write about me and call me a stalker and a predator without any proof. Are you saying that if I started writing about you first, that you wouldn't have any reason to respond? Well, look at what you're doing now. You're responding to my defense posts. Imagine if I had done what you did and wrote about you first and commented on your blog and on other blogs calling you a stalker and predator without any proof. I don't think you would sit quiet either. In fact, I know you wouldn't yet you condemn me for doing it. 

And yes, I did call the police. They saw the same thing I did where your friend says "Someone should put him out of his misery." 

You try and defend this by saying it is an ambiguous statement? And can be taken a few different ways? Then you say I need to take medication for my bipolar? And you claim that if I did that then none of this misery would be going on?  Me taking medication isn't going to make you change.

First of all, who the hell are you to assume you know me? And FYI - not all bipolar conditions need to be treated with meds. There are various conditions and levels of bipolar. Look who I am talking to, Miss "Know It All". 

But yes, it was an ambiguous statement and yes it could be taken a few different ways. However, the police took it the same way I did. Maybe you can advise them to take their medication too. And your adolescent and feeble attempt to make me appear as some lonely and miserable old man is exactly the type of bully statement a bully would make. First you condemn me for thinking that I know you then you turn around and assume you know me. Like I said earlier, the more you ramble on .....

Then you invite the police to come to you? To look at your so called evidence against me? I would love to see it. I bet they are all defense statements, right? Talk about obsessive behavior. But I will say this to you, be careful for what you ask for, you just might get it. Always remember Amanda, you struck first, and second, and third before I struck back. This is all the evidence law enforcement will need to see. That you started it and persisted. That is the evidence I have presented in my previous post about you.

Then you say something very key when you say: "My mistake was to ever let Carroll Bryant know that I existsed."

Indeed! And you let me know that too, didn't you? ... Yes, you sure did. But my question to you Amanda is .... why? Why was it so important for you to let me know who you were by writing about me, commenting on my blog and attacking me on GenXpose hate blog in the comments? Why Amanda, why? ... Trust me when I say, I would have rather you not done that and not stood up for me to notice you.  There was no reason for it so again, why did you do all that to begin with?

You say your regret is not taking your own advice with dealing with internet predators. I wish you would have given me that advice then I would have known how to deal with you. You came after me, and that is what a real predator does. They go after others. I didn't go after you, you came after me. I only defended myself against your attack. So yes, let's hope you and the police meet. All the evidence of who went after who first is documented right here on the internet. And your very own words in comments you left behind. 

You end your pathetic butt-hurt post with: "Don't make the same mistake I did by engaging with your stalker."

Amanda, you engaged with me before I ever knew who you were. That has been proven! There is no doubt about it girl, you are the one who needs to take some medication. You are the one who is lonely and miserable inside. You are the one lying. You are the one who needs help. 

And you are the one who needs to be arrested and stopped. You are the real internet stalker here. That has already been shown. Funny how you can't show it with evidence, the other way around. Can you?  .... Sounds like a natural born liar to me. 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... (bipolar and all - with the truth - and evidence to back it up) and this is The Looking Glass.

Things We Learned Today:

* The same thing we already learned - that Amanda Welling is a liar 

Amanda Welling Saga: Amanda Condones Murder

I wasn't sure if I wanted to do this post. I know I mentioned doing something like this but that was when I heavily considered to post that email Amanda Welling sent me, and some of her comments. Of course, when Amanda read my comments, she took the liberty of posting the email herself. I think it's best that way. However, she has made some clever little edits on her post and I want to show how Amanda Welling, Like GenX, and the rest of the bullies, never write the whole truth. And like Jude Henderson, they only show things taken out of context.

I also want to show how, like the bullies, Amanda Welling fails to inform her readers of her wrong doings. How she, like the bullies, refuses to mention their part in this feud. I also wanted to show the reasons why I was hesitant to believe her words and question her reason for approaching me in the first place.

As many of you are aware, Amanda Welling came onto this blog to declare to me "publicly" that she wasn't GenX of the now well known hate blog, GenXpose. At first glance, one would think that she was sincere in her efforts to explain her position. Her first course of action in her attempt to contact me was this post she left in the comments section of The Looking Glass on the post, "GenX Says" Part two". Here is a screen shot of that comment.

She starts it off by saying: "I'm sick and tired of being dragged into this bullshit ..." 

Here's the thing, nobody dragged her into this bullshit, she volunteered when she posted an article on her blog and referenced me to being that of a stalker and a sexual predator. This was back in July 2012. Almost a year ago. keep in mind, at this point, I didn't know her and she didn't know me. Without any conscience, she saw what was going on with me and the attack I suffered as well as read what others were probably saying too. But did she refrain from getting involved with the situation? No, she did not. And by her own words above, she admits to having written that post. She claims it wasn't meant to "target" me, however, she did mention me by name and again, made sure her readers would get the impression that I was a stalker and a sexual predator - in her opinion. 

I got news for you Amanda, that wasn't me dragging you into this bullshit. That was you making the choice to get involved with it. I think that is academic. However, in the above screenshot of her comment, she also says: "I referenced you in ONE article last year and that is it."

Well, Amanda, that's all it really takes now isn't it? However, you did do more than that, didn't you? Yes, you did, and what was it that you did beyond writing that article? You made posts on my other blog like this one. Check it out. 

It would seem on my post back in late July of 2012, called "Internet terrorists: Ignorance Run Amuck", Amanda Welling didn't approve of me linking to her blog after she wrote about me. Now, did I go onto her blog and get all up in her grill for writing her article about me? No, I didn't. But as the evidence shows, she came to mine to bitch at me. She says in this comment that: "I have had nothing to do with this matter. I haven't harassed you ..." 

Apparently, writing about me, and coming onto my blog to comment isn't harassing me? I'm harassing her? Well, before you answer that question, go to that post and read it. I don't have any links to anyone's blog on that particular post, which means I hadn't posted a link of hers either. So what is she talking about? She's talking about this comment that was left on that post by "anon". Take a look. 

It would seem she thought even back then that I was posting comments on my own blog? Isn't that what the bullies think I do on The Looking Glass? Maybe this next shot will answer that.

So you see, accusing me of leaving anon comments on my blog(s) began almost a year ago. And Amanda thought I left that one. She also shows hypocrisy when she says: "I don't want a link to my blog posted on this site." 

Really Amanda? You didn't? Well, guess what? I didn't want you writing about me on your blog, but I didn't have any say in the matter, did I? Once again, that word "entitlement" comes to mind. The same entitlement that the bullies feel that they have a right to post whatever they want on their blogs but I don't have that same right. The same way GenX feels entitled as well. 

How did I respond to her comment? Take a look for yourself.

And just like that, this Amanda Welling saga began.

And what did I say to her back then? "You put yourself into it by doing that." Meaning, when she wrote about me and linked to her source, she volunteered to be noticed. You see, I didn't drag her into any bullshit. She happily dragged herself into it. 

Somebody got it because another anon left this comment in response to hers.

 Then Amanda left me another comment, but I didn't post it. At that time, I was unaware of the fact that people who left comments on my blog couldn't delete them. I thought they could. Anyhow, I merely posted what she said. Take a look. 

I like how she says: "You want to be bullied? I can do that! Just say the word!"

Hhhmmm, isn't that interesting to know? Okay, well, you can read my response on the shot above. Anyhow, this next shot shows Amanda calling me vindictive. This after she wrote an article referencing me. And she says yet again how she didn't want to be involved in this whole mess despite the fact that she had written an article about me. How crazy is that? And she finished her comment with this: "If you are being bullied, look into the mirror and ask yourself if you are part of the blame." Read it for yourself. 

Correct me if I am wrong here, but isn't she pretty much blaming me for being bullied? Really? Are you shitting me? Apparently not because you read it for yourself. That's exactly what she is doing. Apparently, people who get bullied deserve it for .... for ..... I don't know, I can't think of a reason that is excusable for anyone getting bullied. Evidently, according to Amanda, if people think you're a jerk or something then you brought your bullying onto yourself. Try and figure that one out. Better yet, go to Amanda's blog and ask her why she thinks it's okay to bully people. Use this screenshot and her own words for your reference when you do. I would compare her statement to that of blaming a woman for being raped when she was prancing around in that short dress all day. Maybe Amanda thinks this too. I don't know. You would have to ask her. 

Of course, there were some people who got it back then. One of these people left this very telling comment. Notice at the end where this anon mentions people on Goodreads wishing me death. 

This couldn't have been me commenting as an anon either because at that point and time, my ISP was banned from Goodreads so I couldn't even get in under a different name. I had to get another computer, which I did, in order to pull that trick off. But apparently, even on Goodreads, these bullies were wishing me dead. I sure wish I could find out where so I could screenshot them. But wishing me dead is a common theme from these bullies. I have provided a screenshot on this blog in one of my posts where "Mrs. Joseph" from Goodreads wished me dead. In fact, you can find that on one of my book reviews pages. This is also important as we go along here because in a moment, I will show you yet another one on Amanda's blog in her comments section. Then you may decide what kind of people Amanda is and hangs out with online. 

Oh, wait, here it is now. Check it out.

You can see for yourself that "purpleshadowhunter" says: "Someone needs to put him out of his misery."

Nice person there, right? I guess to Amanda and her friends, murder is perfectly acceptable. If anyone does put me out of my misery, I will let the police know who they can arrest. In fact, I contacted police to let them see it for themselves. They came to my home and not only did three officers witness it, but I also printed up the whole page of Amanda's blog article and all of the comments which includes that one. (Not to mention the screenshot I got) Anyhow, I also gave them Amanda's name (and her husband) and they are going to look into the matter. Evidently, Amanda is responsible for what gets posted on her blog, including death threats. Not only did she allow the comment to be posted, she refused to do the right thing and promptly take it down. However, as from what I was told, she and the person who posted that comment are liable in the event that somebody does decide to take "purpleshadowhunter's" advice and put me out of my misery. 

Amanda will probably now take down that comment but I hope she doesn't. It doesn't matter. It's been documented and recorded and could still be pulled up if required. What goes on the internet, stays on the internet. GenX even said that herself one time. 

Anyhow, Amanda did make this comment herself. At the end, she mentions: "I know I don't buy books who attack reviewers."

Newsflash Amanda, I never attacked reviewers. I don't consider "The List" as attacking anyone. If you think it is, then surely all the posts written about me, including yours, is attacking me as well. But that list was an accurate account of what happened to me. It was also posted in "my personal space". Namely, my blog. But that's okay, I love it when you lie. As Amanda or GenX, it doesn't matter.

This next shot is also interesting. It just goes to show how little people know about what is really going on. That or they prefer to ignore the truth. Or they are just simply filled with hate. I don't know. Anyhow, take a look.

Natalie Cleary says: "I saw a lot of what he did last year." - Really Natalie? And just what was that I did a lot of? Nobody has presented any evidence of anything I did. It sure would be nice to know what it is exactly I did. It would be even nicer if anyone out there in Bully Nation would show evidence of what I did. ..... And father time keeps ticking away in silence, waiting for all of this so called evidence to materialize.

Natalie also goes on to say: "To get personal then is just ridiculous." - You can say that again Natalie. The same way Amanda got personal with me by writing about me and commenting on my blogs. And the way all of her friends (and yours?) get personal with me with what you all write about me. And referring to me as being "5" years old, well, that would make you and Amanda and the rest of Bully Nation even younger, wouldn't it? You know, since you all were the ones who started this shit in the first place.

Natalie goes on to say: "So sorry you have to put up with that shit." - Really Natalie? If you think she has to put up with so much shit, you should see all the shit I have to put up with what with two hate blogs in my honor and everything. But wait! I forgot, that's okay because according to Amanda in that earlier screenshot, I asked to be bullied. Just like girls ask to be raped, huh? Isn't that what you think? Isn't that what you're saying Amanda? Natalie? ... Sure it is.

Then Amanda responds with this.

She says: "You're exactly right. He's a bully and abuser. I'd hate to think how he treats the women in his life. I honestly feel pity for him because he truly believes that nothing he is doing is wrong."

You're right Amanda, defending myself isn't wrong. But can you please show evidence of me bullying people? And who exactly have I abused? No one. At least I don't think girls ask to be raped nor do I believe that people ask to be bullied like you obviously believe. According to you, people ask for the bad things that happen to them. And as for me believing that I don't do anything wrong, apparently, neither do you. By leaving that comment up where one of YOUR friend wishes someone would "take me out of my misery" - you must not think that murder is wrong. Nor do you think that what you did to me was wrong. Like writing about me first. Making comments on GenXpose blog and calling me fat (when actually, I'm not) and joining in on all the fun earlier this year at my expense. Oh sure, that wasn't wrong was it? Of course not because I asked to be bullied, right Amanda? I mean, you said it yourself. I have the screenshot posted up above to prove it. 

She goes on to finish her comment by saying this: "If he thinks he's going to get an apology from me for things I haven't done, it aint happening."

Ahem - But Amanda, sweetheart, the screenshot earlier of your comment on my blog here clearly shows you confessing to the article you wrote with me in it. You did do something wrong. You just lied ..... again! 

But this isn't the first time you lied, is it? 

At the end of the previous screenshot, you say: "Please keep this private. I would like this to be settled between the two of us, like adults."

Is this why you came to me first publicly on my blog? To keep it private? To settle this strictly between the two of us? You see Amanda, you say one thing yet do the opposite. If you really wanted to resolve this privately, you would have never commented on my blog. You would have just emailed me right from the get go. But you didn't do that, did you Amanda? No. You didn't. Or, how about this next lie?

You said: "I removed the review months ago." - Isn't it funny Amanda that you confused a few months to no more than a few days? The fact is you posted that fake review up months ago and only took it down within a few days earlier at best. For all I know, you may have taken it down moments before you commented that you took it down months ago. It's just one lie after another with you, isn't it? 

And after all of that information you gave me about the "real" GenX, claiming she is a Canadian woman - because you know, you Skyped with her and everything, an anon mysteriously appears and says this:

I especially like the part where this person says: "Heck, she doesn't even have the same equipment if you get my drift".

So which is it, Amanda? Is this anon lying or are you lying? Is genX a woman? A man? You? ... Never mind, rhetorical.

Then Danielle B makes this interesting comment on Amanda's blog. 

She says: "I can't believe an author and ADULT is so childish to continue bashing people for months over and over."

Well "Danielle B", I can't believe it either. I mean, Amanda bashed me almost a year ago on her blog article and then she returned several months later (about six months later to be exact) and bashes me again on GenXpose blog! How childish of her! I agree totally! 

Then she goes on to say: "It so stupid that he makes things up to use as personal attacks." - Really Danielle B? I made everything up? I suppose I made all of these screenshots up too? You see, she is severely misled because in Amanda's post, she fails to acknowledge her attacks against me which brought her into this mess. It is clear that Amanda is playing the "GenX" game of lies and truth withholding when it comes to explaining what really happened with her and I and what has led us to the here and now. Amanda Welling clearly refuses to acknowledge her part in all of this, even if she isn't GenX, Amanda Welling still has failed to accept responsibility for what she herself admits to doing. She also continues to fail to apologize for it which makes me believe that she harbors no remorse or regret for her own actions and words. Which is why I didn't buy into her sincerity in taking stuff down and when she claims she isn't GenX. There's just too many lies coming from out of her mouth. I can hardly keep up with them all.

And to think, she continues to practice that behavior to this day. I find this repulsive. And I feel sorry for her. I really do. I pity her terribly. I also can't understand why she and "GenX" would have had a falling out when they think and act so much alike! ... So much so, it's uncanny. 

Then "Beth W" says this: "You can totally sue him for libel, and win." Take a look if you don't believe me. 

Really Beth? She could sue me? Great! I hope to hell that she tries! I could sue her too. And GenX. And all the rest of you for all of your libelous comments where you people call me a rapist, a pedophile, a stalker, a bully, and the list goes on and on. So yeah, Amanda, take Beth's advice and 'sue" me. LMAO. I would love to go to court with any of you bullies. ANY! I just wanted to make that clear. So yeah, if any of you want to sue me, please, I beg you, go for it. 

Beth also mentions that this almost cost her a job. Well, just remember Beth, Amanda may have cost me book sales. And probably so has the rest of the bullies. I guess that's okay though because you know, like Amanda said, I asked to be bullied.

Beth also says that conversations are not working with me. You're right Beth, they aren't and you want to know why? It's because Amanda is always lying to me. You can't hold a constructive conversation with people who constantly lie to you and about you like Amanda does with me. It's completely impossible! 

I especially like this comment from "Bellas Bookshelf". More directly, I like the part where she says: "Amanda, you don't deserve to be targeted by nuts".  Take a look.

Well Bellas Bookshelf, neither do I deserve to be targeted. And I especially didn't deserve to be targeted by Amanda Welling AND her husband Jon AND the rest of Bully Nation. 

I also don't deserve for "purpleshadowhunter" trying to motivate some crazy person to come and "put me out of my misery" either. And yet, somehow I get the feeling that you and Amanda and the rest of you evil people do think I deserve to be murdered.

But I think this last screenshot is my favorite. It's by Nicole Mainardi. Take a look.

 She says I'm not doing myself any favors for bashing bloggers, especially someone as established as Amanda is. First of all, Nicole, I never bashed Amanda, she bashed me. And she didn't do herself any favor by doing that, did she? When it comes to Amanda (GenX) I only post what is said about me and defend it. Just like I am doing now. I am showing how Amanda lies just as much as the other bullies. But if Amanda had an issue with me, she should have come to me in private and not through my blog comments. She should have been honest with me about everything. This post showed that she wasn't. She should have apologized for her own acknowledgements of what she did to me. Against me. But she didn't. 

I would love to give Amanda some good advice, but I'm afraid somebody else beat me to it. And I am going to close this post with the screenshots of some comments that I found very wise. It came from an anon, but I sure wish I knew who this person is so I could extend my respects specifically to them. This person left the comments here on my blog. I think the advice offered to Amanda from this anon is about as good as advice can get. 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass.

Things We Learned Today:

* Amanda lied when she said she wanted to resolve this privately

* "purpleshadowhunter" wants someone to "put Carroll out of his misery"

* Carroll contacted law enforcement about that comment by "purpleshadowhunter"

* Amanda's true colors are plain to see (and so are the colors of her friends)

* Amanda Welling distorts the truth

* Amanda admitted to her involvement against Carroll (But not in her blog post)

* Amanda Welling can dish it out, but she sure as shit can't take it

* Carroll didn't get Amanda involved with this mess, she volunteered of her own free will

* The common theme with these bullies is - they wish Carroll dead

* Wishing people dead isn't the way to show you're the good guy

  

UPDATE: 06/11/13

I just found out something shocking. (Well, it's shocking to me) That the lady who thinks I need to be "put out of my misery" is a self proclaimed Christian! No kidding. Check out these next few screenshots.

Here is her blog.

Really? A Christian wishes that somebody would just kill me? OMG! How horrific is this? I doubt she is really a religious person if she wishes for me to be murdered. I would never allow anyone to say anything like that about anybody on my blog. I wouldn't even be friends with someone who thinks that killing people and wishing them dead is acceptable behavior. If anyone ever left a comment on this blog saying something like, I would report them to the proper authorities. There is just no reason what-so-ever to say something as God awful as that! But to think that someone who claims to have the love of God and Jesus in their heart to say that? I doubt very seriously that God or Jesus approves of that kind of behavior. "purpleshadowhunter", you need to reevaluate your priorities girl. And you say you're going to college to be a Special Education Teacher? Really? Well FYI, I have already worked with kids and adults with special needs. Trust me, I don't think we as a society want someone who wishes that somebody would murder me to be teaching their child with special needs. While I myself am not "religious', I will ask my religious friends to pray for you, "purpleshadowhunter".

GenX Says (Part Three)

Welcome to part three of the "GenX Says" series. We ended part two with the suicide issue and remarks. The thing is, there are a couple more screenshots where they harp further about that issue. At first, I wasn't going to include them, that poor dead horse can't take this kind of beating. But then I decided to go ahead and skim through them as quickly as possible. (So please bare with me if you can). The truth is, there are a lot of dead horses to beat here with the bullies because they pay themselves over and over again like a broken record. (If you can still recall what a record is) So let's not waste any more blog space than need be, okay?

To quickly recap, GenX and her goon squad (Or sock puppets) made a post where they all pretty much commented on things I said in many of my defense posts and now, I am responding to those comments. All the screenshots you see in this series came from one post on GenXpose hate blog, believe it or not. (For the most part anyway) I have had to take some shots from Goodreads and such for a few of their accusations to prove them wrong.

Anyhow, we will pick up here on part three where we left off from on part two. 

This first shot is where I made a comment about Jude's suicide threats to the effect that I called her last threat a bluff when I informed her that I was going to block her from emailing me because obviously, she did not go through with it, as it stands, she is still alive. In the response by the most idiotic of the bunch (which is saying a lot) "EA" - She assumes I am calling myself a professional psychiatrist. See for yourself.

No, "EA", I am not a professional psychiatrist, but you and your bully friends seem to think you guys are. (Resort to the conclusion of part two) where you bullies give out more psychological advice than a real psychiatrist. 

Thanks for calling me amazing though! I appreciate that.

(Sarcasm versus sarcasm - on the next Jerry Springer Show)

Then in this next shot, I talk about tough love. "EA" continues with her blah blah banter in response. Check it out. 

How am I focusing on myself? How am I blaming the victim? First of all, it is her fault for making the threats in the first place. What normal person would threaten suicide as much as she did? She does need to get help for that. I was always under the assumption that she was getting help. But how was it my responsibility to make sure she got that help? It's hard enough to make someone get help when you're there in the flesh, much less, to try and do it when she lives in Mexico and I live in Ohio. (In America) Not to mention, she was an 18 year old minor (sarcasm) and I was stealing her identity. (More sarcasm)

To understand those sarcasms you need to read part two.

And yes, "EA", it WAS her fault that I was angry with her for making all those suicide threats. She freaking made them! It wouldn't anger you that someone would make suicide threats repeatedly to just always get their way in a relationship?  Well, if your answer is no, then you probably aren't a very good friend. Even though she only made them to get her way. She was never serious about it. That's what angered me more, that she would make threats like that and not mean it. 

She didn't make the threats out of "depression" - she made them out of anger to get her way. There is a difference. And no, I am not a professional psychiatrist, but having been suffering from bi-polar since my car accident, I learned a lot about suicide. I am willing to bet I know more about the subject than you and all your bully friends put together. And yes, I was the adult, but news flash here: She was an 18 year old adult also! We were both adults. 

And FYI "EA", I may be a worthless piece of crap, but I am still worth more than you. I have more worth in my big toe than you do in your entire body. Just saying. Dumb-ass.

In this next shot, I talk about "The Runaway Pen" again, focusing on T.L.'s "advice" giving. 

AreaFive replies: "Who the hell is Bryant to advise? He can't keep his stories straight."

First of all AreaFive, who the hell is T.L. Shreffler to give advice? And secondly, where do I give advice? I don't see it. And lastly, what story do I not keep straight? Show us! Show where I have conflicting answers to any one question. T.L. talked a lot of shit on her post - shit she knows absolutely nothing about. And why does she know nothing about me? Because like you and all of your bully friends, you don't freaking know me! (But you like pretending that you do.)

Below is the rest of the comments the bullies made to the previous screenshot above.

To address GenX - Yes, this is what started all of this. There are plenty of authors out there who can not afford to give away free reads. Some of them can only afford to give out one or two a month if they are lucky. If you were an author then you would know this. So when an irresponsible blogger hops along and approaches an author for a free read, and then backs out of the deal, it hurts the author financially. First, they get robbed out of a book and second - they get nothing in return. No review. No interview. Thus, no potential sales from what they could have received had that blogger kept their word. For many of these authors, they rely on sales as part of their income. If you're too stupid and immature to understand that then baby, you need to find a real job and or hobby. Especially if you're too much of an asshole bully that you can't resist bullying them with your bully friends when they say something about it.

It's not a Barbie Doll game fuck nuts - It's real life. With real money at stake. With real human beings.

The quicker you and your bully friends learn this, the quicker you might acquire a conscience, a heart and a soul. And if you're lucky, maybe some compassion to boot. 

Then "shit for brains" Cheri replies that the whole idea behind me being at GR was so I could get free reviews and teenage girls." - No Cheri, it wasn't. The reviews and or interviews would not have been free. I would have given my book for those things. Those books are not "free". In fact, I did give them my book for free because they backed out of their service after soliciting me. And as for the teenage girl remark, show me the proof! You are more than welcome to post any evidence you have that I was trying to meet teenage girls. I wasn't even trying to meet Jude. She chased me. I did not chase her. And she continued to chase me even after I revealed myself a week after her 18th birthday. So if you have a problem with Jude and I having a relationship when she turned 18 (a legal adult) then take it up with her. She did all the chasing. 

Then AreaFive gets into it by once again, beating three dead horses in one short sentence. The "fake" pen name. LMAO - The model pic (yawn) and my age. Really? Still obsessed with that pic? And why is it so important for you to know my real age? (I told you guys before this drives the bullies completely nuts) And once again, fake name? Does Elsa Judi Sanchez Hernandez ring a bell? Yeah, your friend Jude's real name. And again (Yawn) she's not even an author! 

Did I mention something earlier about a broken record that repeats itself?

Then of course, the amazingly stupid GenX replies how it all began with my butthurt. (As if their constant whining about my pen name (now my real name) the model pic and my age isn't their butthurt) She says that I, a grown man, didn't get my reviews for free books and that I call it stealing afterward. Well, butthurt Amanda, it is stealing if you ask me for something in exchange for something and I give it but you don't? Guess what? You stole from me. As for me recognizing that these were teenage girls, and I should have known this, well guess what? Heather (from post two) was 35 years old. What's her excuse? Better yet, what is your pathetic excuse for her? (Dumb-ass) And I did "go along with my life" afterward, until Jude stalked me on my shared blog. 

As for me being involved with a minor under fraudulent circumstances, I know we covered this repeatedly in part two, but she was 18 years old, which by law of the planet earth, is not a minor. Liar! And I didn't wage a war on the internet, she did. By manipulating my blog partner so she could keep stalking me. And I don't have Douthit helping me, I don't even know her. I am on my own here. STGRB covered my attack, yes. They did several article's about me and my plight with the bullies because that is her cause. And while we're on the subject of recruiting help to fight battles, Jude recruited you and the rest of the bullies when she posted those emails that I allegedly wrote. Not to mention, all the people you have posting about me on your hate blog where I am only one person. (Hypocrite) 

As for this hate I have for Jude, that is fabrication on your part, I don't hate Jude. I don't even hate you and your bully sock puppets. I hate what you do and the lies you tell about me without proof, but life is too short to hate. I don't hate anybody. Trust me, there are more significant people out there than you in the world I could hate if I wanted to, but unlike you, I don't let that demon in my heart anymore. You and your bully friends are just not worth me condemning my soul with hate for you. If by chance I am wrong about there being a God, at least I can stand before him when I die and proudly proclaim that I have no hate for anyone in my heart or soul. Unlike you and your bully friends. 

"Hello Jesus, we bullied Carroll and the other authors because ....." (Insert excuse here.) 

God is watching? (That's between you and him.) Good luck with that.

And my "allegations" against Goodreads? Seriously? You see, you wouldn't know proof if it crawled up your ass and sneezed. Then answer me this all wise one of the universe, if all it was were allegations, then why did Goodreads act so fast to "save face?" - I bet Patrick Brown cringes every time you speak out about that because he knows they weren't allegations. So does everyone who reads that article. The only people who call it allegations are you and your blog sock puppets. Even many bullies from the bully hate group "Badly Behaving Authors" on Goodreads admit that sexual role-playing between adults and minors was going on, they were just pissed off that I was the one who broke the story. 

GenX, you must be a contortionist - being able to insert your head into your own ass like you do. That's quite impressive considering your - um - body size? (As this next screenshot will show)

Yeah, I went there. Deal!

In this next screenshot, the bullies continue to comment in regards to the screenshot prior to Amanda's profile screenshot. Take a look.

Cheri says that good authors ask for feedback from their readers all the time. Yes they do, Cheri. So did I. And for the better part, I got that feedback. Some positive, some constructive and some not so positive. But what you and your bully friends do by rating and reviewing books you never even read isn't feedback. It's bullying. And when I did ask for it from the bloggers who stole from me, they didn't give it. First you whine about (and give excuses) for your bully friends who didn't want to review my book(s) when they asked me for it because "They maybe didn't have anything good to say" (Consult part two) and then you change your tune by saying that good authors ask for feedback like you bullies would actually be honest with that feedback. not to mention that STGRB has plenty of screenshots showing when authors ask for feedback from the bullies, you all take offense and start ripping them a new one. Can we say hypocrite again? Yeah, I think we can. 

What's up with that?

Then finally, Hall of Famer "EA" (Consult part two) says that for an amateur author I have a chip on my shoulder. I'm expecting to get good reviews just because I gave away a free book? - First off, an amateur is someone who doesn't get paid for their work. I collect royalty checks for my writing, thus, my amateur status has officially been revoked. (It would appear that math is not the only thing the bullies suck at.) I also do not have a chip on my shoulder, but while we're talking about chips on shoulders, you mean like the one you and your bully friends have about my pen name (now my real name) and the model pic, and my age? You mean that kind of chip? LOL

And no, I never expect good reviews - I only expect honesty. A concept that is totally lost on you and your bully friends. And the only reason I gave away free books to your bully bloggers is because they stole them from me by promising me a review in exchange for the book which they failed to deliver on when they solicited me. So that kills your "bribe" theory. I never once tried to negotiate a good review in exchange for a free read. Not once! But if you have evidence that contradicts my claim, please present it to me. To all of us. The whole world. 

You can't, can you? Didn't think so. You can't prove it if it never happened.

In this next shot, I am talking about more of Evie Seo and her bully post about me. We get more asinine replies from the whiners. Take a look.

AreaFive kicks things off by questioning my irresponsible reporting. Hey AreaFive, you mean like the posts I make where I show screenshots of what you say about me and set the record straight? (Like how I started this "GenX Says" series in part one where you liars mention how Jude was 15 when she and I met and I showed with actual screenshots that it wasn't true?) Do you mean like that kind of irresponsible posts? Well, let's skim through your irresponsible posts,, shall we? Like for example: My name, my age, the model pic, and accusations that I chase after minors. You only post evidence about the model pic but never present any evidence that I chase after minors. You don't even post evidence that I chased after Jude. How irresponsible is that? And my name is irrelevant. A non-issue yet you boo-hoo about it all the time when in fact, your friend Jude continues to lie to everyone in regards to her real name. My age is irrelevant as well. Nobody cares!

You also claim that I stalk Jude yet, you have no evidence to back that up. I have evidence in "Emails with Jude" so, still want to talk about irresponsible reporting? .... No? .... That's what I thought.

Then EA says that I use the word bully too much, and that I am all about the fame. Well first of all, EA, I use the word bully too much because I have to deal with them too much. (namely you and your bully friends over at GenXpose) As for being all about the fame, did I start two hate blogs in my honor? As if one wasn't enough for you bullies (GenXpose) you were the ones who went out and did that. Plus, it's not my fault you bullies keep talking about me in your hate groups and blogs and all over the internet. You do that of your own free will. If I am getting famous, it's because you bullies won't stop talking about me.

Thank you for that, by the way. 

If I am famous and getting more famous everyday, it's because of that. because you bullies have made me famous. 

Then GenX says: "If there's a bully here it's Carroll Bryant. Again, two hate blogs in my honor isn't bullying? Recruiting more people on your hate blog "GenXpose" to come after me isn't bullying? (While hiding behind anonymous names) Emailing me first isn't bullying? And oh, this screenshot of my book sales information (on one of those hate blogs) from Amazon isn't bullying? (Courtesy of a friend who sent this to me) 

This isn't stalking me? Really? And what does my sales have to do with anything? This isn't an attempt to try and publicly humiliate me? You bullies do realize that my books are available for all E-readers, right? They are on about a half dozen book sites, you know this right? 

GenX also goes onto say that my screenshot of Evie's followers doesn't mean anything. Yes it does mean something, GenX. It means nobody gives a rats ass about her and she is trying to get more of her bully friends to follow her. The problem is, you bullies are more scarce than you will admit. STGRB recently did a report about one of them who was caught red handed owning a half dozen sock sock puppets. I suppose we can assume that if all you bullies own six sock puppets each and there is only about 50 of you then obviously, it would make it seem like there is a bunch of you. I'm pretty sure we will be seeing more sock-puppetry exposure in the future where the bullies are concerned. 

And then GenX goes on to mention that that I have never attempted to contact her hate blog to refute any false claims or claims I made on my blog. Actually, GenX, I did make an honest attempt to address all of your claims and mine one time, remember? And how did you respond to that attempt? Allow me to remind you with this next screenshot. 

You see GenX, I did make an honest attempt to address everything, however, you treated it like a 12 year old child. You were the one who didn't want to take me up on that challenge. And you want to know something else? You still won't take me up on it because even to this day, of all the accusations you and your bully friends make against me, not once have you proven anything except that model pic, which I owned up to in December of 2012 - long before anyone knew who the hell you were, Amanda Welling.

(Now who's looking for fame? .... Amanda is! As GenX)

You don't want an honest and open debate that requires evidence because you don't have any evidence to support any of your claims. I even extended many opportunities on this "GenX Says" series for you and your goons to present your evidence. But let's me realistic here, there will never be any evidence to support your "pie in the sky" claims against me, will there? 

Didn't think so.

So, if you already treated my effort in the past to seriously address your claims against me like a 12 year old, why should I ever give you another opportunity? 

As for your final words on your response, where you say I demanded an apology from you, that was to mock your request to me to apologize to you and your bully goon squad. Let us never forget that you came to me first with comments on my blog, STGRB blog, and through email. Not to mention, your "Hippie" blog where you first wrote about me. (Someone you don't even know)

Then we have this shot of GenX commenting how her blog has all the proof. take a look.

She also claims I don't present any evidence. I think we cleared that up in part one of this "GenX Says" series, didn't we? She again says that if you want evidence that all you have to do is go to her blog. Proof of what Amanda? The model pic? Because that's all you present. And as I have said before, that has already been owned by me, addressed, explained and is old news. 

This next shot is of me still talking about one of the blogs that wrote about me. EA responds in classic fashion. 

She says that since I gave these bloggers free books and when I messed up their friend Jude, they decided it would probably be prudent if they didn't do me any favors. She then says she doesn't disagree with their reasoning.

Well EA, Jude and were still friends up until the time I blocked her in February of 2012. Jude wasn't "messed" up by me by that point. (The truth is, Jude was messed up long before I ever entered the picture) Still, if I make a promise to your friend and you two have a falling out, that would not affect my promise to your friend - even if we were friends because I carry relationships on a one on one basis. I do not get involved with my friends relationships with other people. It would be a situation where you two needed to work it out, but it would not have an affect on my promise to your ex-friend. Relationships between individuals are private and no business of anybody else.

I have had friends in the past who tried to get me to side with them in disputes with other mutual friends of ours. I would always say to them, "Dude, that's between you two. Don't get me involved because it's not any of my business and has nothing to do with me."

It's called "being your own person". You might want to try it out sometime.

This next screenshot is very interesting indeed. I talk about the unsuspecting attack on me on Goodreads but the first response by Cheri is an clear cut example of "misinformation" by the bullies and how they say things with no evidence to support their claims. Check it out.

Cheri mentions that I have like fifty blogs to defend myself with. Really Cheri? And you can prove this? (What am I saying, of course she can prove it which is why she hasn't proved it yet) The last time I checked, I only have four blogs. two of which are strictly for my writing. That is approximately 46 blogs shy of the fifty you claim I have. Anytime you want to prove the other 46 blogs, go for it. Good luck though in finding them because they don't exist. You'll be searching for a million lifetimes and beyond. (Infinity?) 

Then GenX says that I love to copy her. LMAO. You see, I said that once about her, and so what does she do? She copies me in saying it. Ha! That's irony right there.

AreaFive concludes it by asking if I have a crush on GenX. Yeah, AreaFive, GenX was first to email me, write about me, comment on my blog .... and I'm the one with the crush? 

I told you before I couldn't make this shit up if I tried.

Then we have this comment I made regarding me making myself available to GenX to address their accusations and to answer their questions. (Scroll up - we covered that already earlier in this post) But here they are responding to it again. 

EA replies (I dig her ass-hattery) "Hey dumb-ass, instead of leaving things like this to your audience to figure out what you're saying, JUST SAY IT. Clarity is not your strength, and if you're trying to be a professional writer, that's not a good thing."

EA, you're the dumb-ass, apparently. I left the screenshot to that comment to answer the question for me. Perhaps you are too stupid to have figured that out. Sometimes, I don't need to come out and say things, all I need to do is post what you idiot bullies say and do to answer questions for me. My audience are intelligent people, unlike your audience of supporters, and they know exactly what I was saying (proving), the same thing I said earlier in this post, that I made the attempt to honestly address your issues with me and GenX responded like a 12 year old with her "Bryant Plays Let's Make A Deal" post. 

It's not my fault that you are too stupid to understand this.

I think by allowing that screenshot to answer for me was both clarity and proof of what I attempted to do. And that proof shows how you and your bully friends lie out of your asses. LOL 

Cheri ends the commenting with: "Class is not his forte'." - Nor is it yours Cheri. You and your bully friends. I mean, still crying with your butthurt over a pic? My name? My age? Really? 

There is more peas in this pod than first thought. 

For this final screenshot of this post, I make the comment in regards to The Rex Files writing a story about me. I make the assertion that it was done so in an attempt for the author Rex Jameson to make a name for himself off of my name. (other than him being a bully, there is no other possible reason for him to write anything about me - somebody HE knows nothing about, huh?) Anyhow, check out the responses to it.

EA says that I really must be a narcissist because I think that this is all about people trying to capture some of my reflected glory. Well, EA, allow me to answer that with this next screenshot of Rex's fans on Goodreads, okay? (She won't get this, I know. JUST SAY IT.) 

What do you think EA? Think he isn't trying to grab some of my reflected glory? he only has six fans! Six! And he has been on GR for like what? A year or more? ..... Six! (JUST SAY IT.) 

I have been banned from GR for almost a year now, and was only a member for about 16 months prior to that. I wonder how many fans I have showing on GR. Hhhmm, let's take a look, shall we?

I rest my case. (Damn my narcissism.) JUST SAY IT.

GenX responds with: "Are you blinded by his beauty yet?" - Well Amanda, this could explain why you and your bully goons are so stupid. Blinded by my beauty or the truth. Pick one. (Or both if you like) 

I also mention in that screenshot that like all the stories before and after Rex Files article on me, that it is riddled with inaccuracies This is when EA raises the question: "Did you ever stop to think that the common denominator is you?" - Yes EA, I am the common denominator here, aren't I? But hey, you and your bully friends made me the common denominator. (Dumb-ass) 

She also adds that it is remarkable how everybody that looks at the situation has the same take and yet, sees it wrong." - Well, EA, you're half correct. You see, not everybody that looks at the situation has the same take, only you bullies have the same take. There is more support for STGRB and myself and other authors who have been bullied by you and your gang of thugs than there are for you and your gang of thugs. And to be honest, I owe that to you guys for making the hate blogs in my honor. That was the first real dead giveaway that you people are the bullies. I can't thank you enough for that. You bullies are only hurting yourself more than what I or STGRB could ever hurt you. It's just that, you bullies haven't opened your eyes up to that yet. (Or have you?) Perhaps this next screenshot will answer that question. (JUST SAY IT) Fine, I will just say it: Yes, you know this because why else would you hide your members names on your hate group "Badly Behaving Authors" on Goodreads after having been showing them in the beginning?" (Hiding for a reason?) Don't take my word for it, look for yourselves.

Yeah, I think you know that you're in the minority.

And as for GenX's response - I say this - It occurred to me. (Looking where you're pointing.)

I'm Carroll Bryant ..... and this is The Looking Glass.

Things We Learned Today:

* Amanda Welling never turns down a meal

* Carroll went there. Deal!

* The bullies have a lot of explaining to do when they stand before Jesus

* Carroll has more fans than Rex Jameson

* The GR bullies are ashamed to show who they are

* The bullies need a new dead horse to beat

* Jude was messed up long before Carroll ever met her

* Carroll has 56 blogs unaccounted for

 * JUST SAY IT