Psychopaths, Sociopaths, and Narcissists

If anything in this short video reminds you of the Goodreads bullies, then you are not alone. 

John Green Shows His Ass

It would stand to reason that John "Look At Me, Look At Me" Green still wants everyone to ... um .... look at him? ... That or he just likes to show his ass. Be that as it may, he left another post on GenXpose blog, ranting and raving, whining and crying, moaning and groaning about all the authors he and his gang of bully thugs have attacked that are standing up for themselves. Bullies really hate it when they are stood up to. Their self entitlement supersedes all commonsense and rationale.

Anyhow, while I am not even going to address his cry-baby whine, I am going to address his accusations towards me. (Yes, it would seem he simply can't open his dumb bully mouth without somehow, someway, directing his own personal butt-hurt towards me.) Despite the fact that he talks about me, writes about me, references me in almost everything he says, believe it or not, he is a heterosexual. (I think) I guess he could be bisexual, but that would be purely speculation on my part. However, his constant need to bring me up at every turn is questionable to say the least. (The very least)

In this screenshot, you will see the beginning of one of his "look at me" rants. Notice at the bottom of the screenshot where he says - "One guy is such a sociopath he openly bragged about clocking the IP address of everyone who visited his site, so he could stalk them if need be."

We all know that "guy" is me, don't we John Green?

Here is the screenshot.

The first thing I would like to draw your attention to is the fact that he has no evidence to support I "stalked" anyone. Yet, for some strange reason, this goober doesn't hesitate a second to accuse me of stalking. 

Now, let me go on record to to say that I did not clock "every" IP, just the ones that were stalking me, and knowingly belonged to the bullies. What's the matter Johnny Boy, get busted did you for stalking me and my blog? I have every right to know who is leaving me death threats and yes, this is the primary reason I would track any IP associated with me online. You and your bully friends like to threaten the lives of people without any remorse what-so-ever. In case you haven't heard the news, making death threats is illegal. Which leads me to my next question, did YOU leave one of those death threats for me on my blog? ... I guess we'll find out soon enough, won't we? Maybe that's why he is so pissed off that I wanted to track IP's. 

Well, I'll have you know John Green that I didn't stalk anyone. Any information I collected was turned over to the proper authorities. That would be the reason for me collecting information. Not so I can "stalk" people. 

I don't know why I waste telling the truth to you, you're just not intellectual enough to understand it. But I am not losing hope for you though, oh no, not by a long shot. I still foolishly believe that one day you will stop your bullying, stalking and harassing ways and actually become the pride of the Marines instead of the biggest embarrassment and disgrace. 

I'm sorry, I can't hold a straight face any longer.

Seriously though, just like with the names of GenX, Amanda Welling, and others, I have never heard of John Green or never thought enough to remember them prior to the year 2013. (That be this year) Just like so many bullies, he appeared out of nowhere and took it upon himself to attack me (someone he doesn't even know) for his own bully reasons. What those reasons are has yet to be determined. Then again, bullies don't usually have any logical reason for their actions. They just operate like some brain-dead zombie, trying to feed off of other peoples brains to supplement their own brain. Word up John "The Look At Me, Look At Me, Brain-Dead Zombie" Green, it don't work that way. Eating my brains isn't going to make you any smarter. But I appreciate the thought that by doing so, it would improve your intellect. 

Would somebody please pass the gravy boat?

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass.

Things We Learned today:

* John Green is starving for attention

* John Green likes gravy?

* Carroll has a hard time holding a straight face where John Green is concerned

* Zombies like to eat brains

* Carroll said "gravy boat"

* Death threats is illegal

He Loves Us (Hitler's Of The Internet)

Well, it didn't take CBL long to read my post about them creating a WHOLE blog in my honor. They took to their keyboards and came up with a post all of their own without stealing anymore of my lines. Good for them! And they went on to address the unusual bull.

They claim to feel special. Well good news, you people are special. (Little Yellow Bus Special) That aside, they claim that I am not a force to be reckoned with. I guess that's why they started that blog about me. (Because I'm not a force) Usually, when someone dedicates a WHOLE blog to one person, it is because that person is a force. But since they don't see it like that, perhaps a JUDE HENDERSON blog would be in order? You know, since making a blog dedicated to one person isn't "creepy" at all.

I slogged through their whine about me and I have a few comments of my own. Let's go through them, shall we?

1) They seem to think I pulled some names out of the hat to come up with my assumption of who is behind the "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog. They can't seem to see the logic as to why I assume it could be GenX, Amanda Welling, John Green and or Jude Henderson. So lets take a look at why I think logically that it could be any one of them or all of them.

First of all, GenX (Amanda Welling) came out of nowhere and started stalking me. I never had any interactions with her beyond her commenting a few times on my blog and on STGRB. When I showed everyone that it was in fact GenX who first approached me and made first contact (when she was claiming it was the other way around) I think I pissed her off royally for showing everyone the truth. (You can read about here GenXpose Part One.) So logically, she would be a good candidate to upstart this CBL blog.

Next, we have Amanda Welling, whom I believe is GenX in disguise. Why? Because her husband is Mepis and he has posted on the GenXpose blog. (As well as mine) And he has emailed me as "Mepis". (As will be shown on March 1st post called "Amanda Welling") But because of his email threats and his obvious anger about exposing his wife as having the sock "GenX" - he and her would be prime candidates of starting the CBL blog, if by chance GenX isn't Amanda, or even if she is. Now that is logical, also when considering that GenX brought in some new people to blog on her GenXpose blog, which would open the door for her to have more time writing on the CBL blog.

Then of course there is John Green and the post I did on him that made him look both, like the fool bully he is and a bit of a pervert. He would logically be a prime candidate to "strike back" with the CBL blog.

And then we have Jude Henderson, the girl that started it all by sharing emails with everyone way  back when and getting these bullies all fired up to attack me on Goodreads. She is obviously hating me because I refuse to allow people to forget the fact that she was behind it all. She sits in the shadows and continues to stalk me and my blogs, emailing me as one of her socks "Angela" for several months and so, yeah, she would be a logical choice to be behind the CBL blog.

So, as you can see, there is logic behind my "obvious" choices. That and the fact that whomever is really behind it, seems to afraid to "show" themselves. But why be afraid? Of little ole me? Really? So say what you want CBL, the fact that you are in HIDING proves that you think I am a force to be reckon with. That and the fact that you started a WHOLE blog just for me. Think about it, when STGRB became a force, they (the bullies) started the blog "Stop The STGRB Bullies". (And look what a joke that blog turned out to be.)

Then they say this ... "We can't blame Jude for using an alias." - Really? And why is it that she does use an alias? ... "Carroll Bryant is the perfect example why everyone should consider protecting their identity. Who would want someone like Carroll knowing their name, date of birth, place of residence, etc? We keep our identities secret to protect ourselves from him and others like him. There is nothing wrong with that." - Really again? You mean, like GenX (Amanda Welling) posting this on her blog about Athena?

It sure does look like it's GenX going that extra mile to "uncover" people's address, phone number and other personal information - and posting it online for the whole world to see - not me. You can scour all my blogs top to bottom and you won't find anything like that. If you still need to see for yourself, just follow this link STGRB Facts, Rumors and Speculation. It is there you will discover all of GenX's (Amanda Welling's) hard work of "stalking" STGRB, Athena and Melissa. It makes me ask the question, what normal person does that?

Then they "attack" a post on my other blog. One that is part of my "Teen Idol" series. They posted a cat on one of their posts to mock me, which makes no sense, then I said "You can't take a blog serious when they post a picture of a cat" so their response to that remark is this ... " If posting a picture of cat makes you unprofessional and immature. surely, posting a picture of Justin Bieber makes you the same, if not worse. How old are you, again? That's right. You've lied about that so many times, as well."

First of all, the post wasn't about a cat, but you used a cat picture, that makes no sense. As for me posting pictures of The Biebs" - It was for a post about "The Biebs" so .... who's picture should I have used? You mean to tell me that he isn't a "Teen Idol?" After all, that is part of an ongoing series of posts I am doing about Teen Idols. Really? You're going to compare a post about using a cat picture on a post you wrote about me, to a post I did about Justin Bieber and using his pictures on the post about him? Oh, and what does age have to do with anything? Because I am "old" I can't write posts about famous teenagers? This is your argument?

I can hear all of my readers laughing - even from this distance.

 

Wow! Talk about reaching for something and coming up empty.

 

Then they make it absolutely clear that ...  "John Green was talking with a PORN STAR about sexual play. We think a porn star would be comfortable talking about that sort of thing since, you know, she's a porn star."

 

Yeah, she's a porn star, that doesn't exactly help his image, does it? Thanks for the FYI.

 

Then they move on to this statement. "The words you use have meaning. For instance, in the interview question Carroll states, "But ever since I was about 14 years old, I always thought about going into the adult film business." Carroll did not say, "When I was 14 years old, I thought about going into the adult film business." See the difference? We hope so. It's not about lacking a sense of humor. We just do not find it funny. We also don't think that stealing a model's photo is funny and passing it off as your own is funny."

 

Really? You're going to nit-pick? Well of course you are, that's what bullies do. That's your job. Fine, I'll remember that for future reference. So when it comes time to use it against you, I don't want to hear your whine. And of course YOU don't find it funny. You people don't find anything funny. You're bullies. That's your job. To NOT have a sense of humor. It's kind of hard to have one when you're so full of hate. And again, still on that "model's pic"? Really? It would seem you would move past that as I have already explained it. But again, that's not your job, is it? Bullies let NOTHING go. They get stuck on the past. Isn't that like you people getting on me for still talking about Jude? Not letting go the past? Only for you, it's that "model pic". Well, here is a news flash - nobody cares! (Except for you bullies) But then again, that would fall under the "no sense of humor" category, wouldn't it? You people need to just let that go. I owned it. Which is more than any of you ever owned up to, that's for sure. See, you say I don't own up to nothing so you rag me for it, then I own it and you still rag me - Nobody can win with you bullies. Nothing is ever good enough for you.

 

Then they address this issue:  "We do believe that Carroll has socks and no, not the kind you put on your feet. Carroll still clambers around Goodreads and we believe he has at least one open account there even though he claims he has no interest in regaining his banned account. We know that he has had at least one account he wasn't supposed to have and we don't believe for a second that he actually deleted it."

 

Well, let's just assume for the moment you're right, that I do have an open account on Goodreads, that would be one, singular, where as you said "socks" (plural) You would still be wrong. (See, I said I would remember it and hold you to your "word" exactly as written like you did me and I am holding it against you.) But I digress, you only "believe" I have socks. You still have no proof. But does that stop you from saying anything? Hell no. Because a bullies job is to lie and libel at every turn. You bullies have the bully code down to a science. But yes, I deleted it. However, to show you I really don't give a rats tail, I will be creating a new one when I get back from vacation and go in search of more sexually explicit role playing between adults and minors, just to see if "Patrick Brown" really cleaned it up. And if I find it, I will post it again. More evidence. So chew on that.

 

Then they say this. "Carroll Bryant isn't allowed to post here for one reason. He has his own space where he can post. In fact, he has a handful of blogs where he can post whatever he wants to post. It's nothing hypocritical. All we are saying is that he doesn't need to do it here. Maybe if he doesn't like our rules, he should talk to STGRB? They have very similar rules. Pot calls the kettle black, wouldn't you say?"

 

Yes, I have a handful of blogs (four to be exact) and two of them is strictly my writing and my original blog I no longer talk about you bullies or address you. This is why I started this blog. But you make a blog about someone (me) and don't even allow that someone (me) to respond on it? To address your lies? And what does STGRB have to do with anything? I can't control what they do or how they run their website. I have no power there. I have no say-so what-so-ever. But you're still going to hold their policies against me? Well of course you are, because you're bullies. That's your job. But that's okay, I have this blog to address your lies and I am placing bets that that will be enough.

 

Then they go on with this statement: "Carroll not only lacks self-control, he also lacks reading comprehension. In our last post, we listed common traits of narcissists. We never said all apply to Carroll. He seems to think we did. It's okay. Nobody is perfect."

 

You pretty much insinuated. I mean, when you call somebody a narcissist, you've pretty much covered it all. I don't seem to think you did .... You just did.

 

Then they pretty much wrap it up with this: "Lastly, Carroll might want to remember why everyone started speaking up about him in the first place. Is it amnesia? Old age setting in? Denial? With 100% certainty, Carroll did something very wrong that led to bloggers and readers all over the globe pissed off. Just check out his history in our menu bar. And yes, Carroll, that is your history. We are sorry you won't own it, but it is yours."

 

Now let's just assume I actually did do something wrong. Who put you bullies in charge to be my "judges, jury and executioners?" I mean, people make mistakes all the time, or am I the only one? But more importantly, what did I do wrong? What was it that I did (that you can prove) that was so God awful that you bullies have to go and try and ruin my career as a writer? ..... What? .... Did I kill someone? .... No. ..... What? .... Just because I played a bad joke with that "model pic" and it got out of control? Is it because I won't reveal my real age? Is it because when I started out I used a pen name? (Then later changed it to my real name) .... What? .... because some girl claims that I stalked her when I have evidence that shows she stalked me? On my shared blog? Manipulating a girl younger than her to do it? So she could get back at me for blocking her from emailing me anymore? Come on, what did I do? Because all those links you have are to other people who DON"T KNOW ME or THE TRUTH about what really happened. They are just speculating and lying just like you are. But again, even if I did do something wrong, who made you Gods of internet world and other people's reputations and lives and careers to which you try to ruin? Are you saying that you people (the bullies) are perfect and so shall we all be? What?

 

You see, it doesn't matter if you're right or not, you still have no right at all to crucify people on your "holier than thou" cross. It's not your responsibility to go around and "Judge" others. God is watching you. And this is exactly what you are doing to me and other authors out there - You're "judging" them, then finding them guilty without just cause and then ... you and your bully gang goes out and do everything you can to "destroy" them. That is living with hate in your hearts and again, if there is a God, that God is watching. because according to the word of the bible and the Lord himself, "He is the one who do all the judging." - Not to mention - "Hate the sin, not the sinner."

 

But you see, this is the point, it doesn't matter if I did anything wrong - You still have no right to do what you people go around doing. You need to let it go. You need to stop hating so much. You really do. All of you bullies. Jude included.

 

Then they end their post with this: *This is the longest post you will ever see on our site. Well, hopefully. It's a semi-promise."

Seeing is believing. But with these bullies, not only can all they make are semi-promises, but you can't believe a single thing they say. Apparently, they are perfect. And they are the internet-worlds "Judges, Jury and Executioners". So beware of them. They are the Hitler's of the internet.

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is the Looking Glass.

 

 

 

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

 

 

* The people behind "Carroll Bryant Lies" and their supporters are the "Hitler's of the Internet"

 

* The bullies are perfect

 

* The bullies are "Judge, Jury and Executioners" of authors

 

* The bullies don't like me posting about teen idols and or Justin Bieber

 

* The bullies are stuck on the "model pic"

 

* The "model pic" is all they have on me

 

* Jude Henderson stalked me on my shared blog

 

* The bullies think I have socks on Goodreads and they seem to think one is plural

 

* The bullies have no proof I didn't delete my old "sock" account I used to do my GR RP investigation

 

* GenX (Amanda Welling) is the one "doc-dropping"

 

* There is no evidence to suggest that Carroll doc-drops

 

* John Green talks to porn stars

 

* Carroll is going to start a "Jude Henderson" blog when he returns from California (because that wouldn't be creepy at all.) Or maybe he already did?

Missing In Action

This is interesting. John Green took down a couple of posts about me on his blog and offers up a strange explanation.

More dissention in the ranks? Kind of like what happened with GenX and Ann Somerville? One can only speculate I imagine. Cutting ties with Amanda Welling would be a good idea right about now.


Okay, this post was too short so now, let's have some fun. I was recently directed to the Jon and Amanda Welling blog, "Carroll Bryant Lies". To the comment section of the page "His History" and there I found this exchange. (Check out the screenshots)

First of all, sorry "anon" that my posts are too long and boring and go off track sometimes. I'll try and do better. But you are right, I shift gears a lot.

Apparently, somebody wants to see all the evidence of everything I have been accused of doing. Can't say I blame them, I wouldn't mind seeing it myself. Be that as it may, this "anon" got the proverbial treatment of "Blah, blah, blah, STGRB, blah, blah, blah, Carroll Bryant, blah, blah, blah, *Tear* and blah.

What I was drawn to was this statement when Jon (or) Amanda responded:

"In short, Carroll posted a list of bloggers who didn't fulfill their reviewing duties on one of his books. It was later admitted, by Carroll, that he never sent books to these bloggers, but he was mad that they didn't keep their promise. That never made sense to many people. He didn't lose money on anything and book bloggers are not required to review books that are sent to them to begin with. A few of the bloggers he named claimed they didn't have anything to do with him. It escalated from there and turned into a huge mess."

I later admitted that I never sent books to these bloggers? Really? Can we see a screenshot of where I say that? I sure would like to see it because I can't seem to recall saying that. I did send those books to those bloggers after they approached me asking for a free read in exchange for a review and or interview. (It varied from blogger to blogger) And while I was mad they didn't keep their word, I let six plus months go by before posting "The List". And why did I post the list? To get back at Jude Henderson for manipulating my friend and co-blogger in allowing my friend to make Jude an administrator on our shared blog under the guise of "helping with her blog design" just so she (Jude) could leave links to her blogs on the pages of my shared blog. And why would Jude do this? Because she wanted to "rub it in my face" and show me that she can still "get" to me anytime she wanted.

And why would she want to do that? Because I had blocked her from being able to email me a few months prior. This was Jude's way of "getting back" at me. You see, Jude didn't want people to know she and I were still "friends" - she wanted to be "secret" friends. (Don't ask me why, I still don't know. She's crazy that way)

Anyhow, I posted "The List" as a retaliation for what Jude did. I don't mind that she tried to "lash out" at me, I just didn't like her using, manipulating and deceiving my friend in the process. When you use my friends as a way to get even with me, I'm going to come down hard on you. That's what I did.

It may not justify the situation, but I did it for payback - right or wrong - and I own it. I would do it again if I had the chance. But those bloggers who broke their word, they were Jude's friends and when Jude broke her word, they followed her.

Now that we got that straightened out, I still want to see the screenshot where I said I recanted my story and said I never sent those books. So please, show us the proof "Carroll Bryant Lies". (Or should I say Jonathon Welling? Amanda? GenX? Whomever you are. LOL (That last one was sarcasm. Sorry about that.

But seriously, you said it, you made the claim - now produce your evidence.

 

Trust me when I say, you will never see it. Why? Because I never said it. Hey, I thought your blog was to report on my lies, not make your own lies up?

 

Oh, here is something funny. Check this out. They posted a screenshot of their "Traffic" and it has me written all over it.

 

 

 

I hate to break the bad news Welling family, but I have only been to your site about four times the past three days. I think what you have there are "my readers" clicking on your link I left in one of my posts. Hey, you can thank me later for sending you the page views, just glad I could help out. I said I would do that if you wanted.

And look at you, almost 1000 views already. My, aren't we the grown up bloggers?

 

And while we're on the subject of "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog, I was sent this email from a site visitor who took time out of their day to read Jon and Amanda's little blog and then took the liberty to leave a comment which, amazingly enough, was never published. So this person took the extra time out of their day to send me a copy of it via email. I thought since "Carroll Bryant Lies" didn't publish the comment from one of their readers, I would post it here. And here is that comment.

 

Now, let me see if I get this straight "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog; You don't want me commenting because, as you stated, I have a gazillion blogs to say my peace, so why didn't you publish this readers comments? Oh, wait, let me guess, because it defends me? (And you don't call yourself a hate blog?) So, for everyone reading this, the comment policy over at "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog is as follows: "Agree with us. Do not defend Carroll Bryant. Conflicting opinions to what we believe will result in your comment NOT being published!"

 

I'm still waiting to see that screenshot. That proof. Turning blue in the face over here. Can't ... hold ... my ... breath ... much .....

 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is the Looking Glass.

 

 

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

 

* John Green took down a couple of posts about Carroll Bryant under suspicious circumstances

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" said I re-tracked a statement but can't show the proof

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" - actually they do lie

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" is getting a lot of visitors from my "Looking Glass" blog

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" won't publish your comment if the comment is in support of Carroll Bryant

* Carroll posted "The List" just to get back at Jude

* Jude stalked Carroll on his shared blog

* Jude used Carroll's friend to try and get even with Carroll

* Carroll can't hold his breath .... much .... longer .....

GenXpose: Hypocrisy In Action!

So recently, I documented a new blog called "Carroll Bryant Lies" which apparently, as according to the bullies who created it, isn't a "Blogger" ToS violation. Despite the fact that they are libeling me by using my name and informing everyone in the title that I "lie". However, when I created three new blogs of my own using a few of the bullies names, followed by the truth, they start crying "Violation! Violation!" As shown here in these screenshots.

It would further illustrate how these bullies feel entitled to be able to create any blog they want about me and yet, nobody can do the same in return about them. Can you see their hypocrisy?

I have, of my own free will, suspended those blogs (and changed their names to better resemble the blog with my name, but the shock factor did the trick) until I return from my vacation in early April. Nobody will be allowed to see any of the posts until I change the settings. (If I change the settings) But bullies, you are now on alert. If you can do it, then so can I. And I will - reopen those blogs if you insist on playing your childish games and continue to stalk, harass and bully me with the "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog.

Are we understanding each other? I hope so.

 

Trust me, if my blogs violate any ToS by Google, then so does yours and all of us will end up losing all of our blogs in the end. Trust me on this. Or, we will all be allowed to have these blogs and we continue the insanity. Or, you take me to court where I will gladly go with you. It's your choice. You have until April to decide.

 

This madness is going to end one way or another.

 

 

 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass.

 

 

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

 

* The bullies can dish it out, but they can't take it

 

 

 

UPDATE:

 

The Blog "Carroll Bryant Lies" calls my new blogs I created "fuckery" - where as their blog about me is NOT fuckery? Hypocrisy well played Amanda and company. Coming on the heels of exposing the truth about GenX really being Amanda Welling. Do you have anymore lies you wish to share Amanda? I mean, GenX?

Carroll Bryant Lies

Hey everyone! Great news to share. Somebody has honored me with a blog dedicated all to me! Isn't that amazing?! Apparently, I am a force to be reckoned with. How cool is that? On the surface, it appears that GenX, Amanda Welling, John Green and who knows how many more are behind it, but now, instead of going after STGRB, they are STILL coming after me. But seriously, a whole BLOG dedicated to me and my lies? LOL Okay, but you do realize that to be taken seriously, you HAVE to provide actually proof of my lies. You know this, right?

Let's take a look at this blog, shall we?

 

Carroll Bryant Lies appears to be focusing on "my lies". All three of them. LOL Yeah, I know, right? But anyhow, let's take a look at one of these lies that this new blog site wants to focus on. It is the dreaded "Model Pic".

 

First of all, didn't I explain that here? Goodreads Bullies: My Final Defense Post

 

I'm fairly certain I did. You know, a joke that went too far. Apparently, the Goodreads bullies aren't swallowing it. (Maybe because their foot is still in their mouth - hard to swallow a foot whole) Not to mention, I can't help what others put on their blog, can I? Of their own accord? Well, evidently, the Goodreads bullies seems to think so. Hey, GenX and Amanda or whomever you are, I know you want to impress me by giving me credit for special powers, but honestly, I can't make people do my bidding. I wish I could. I have a task in mind that I would make you do, but that aside.

 

They seem to focus on my defense against John Green's attack article on me. (If you'll note, all of my posts are "DEFENSE" posts of "OTHER" people's posts that "ATTACK" me. This leads me to believe that these bullies are sending the message, "If we attack you first, and you try to mount a defense, we will attack you further by creating a blog JUST FOR YOU!")

 

 Anyhow, because I posted that tweet John made about ... um ... "things he likes to eat" ... the bullies now want to talk about me wanting to be a "porn star".

 

Okay, I said that in an interview. Apparently, first of all, the bullies have no sense of humor. They take everything in a literal sense. It is obvious that "they" do not get the joke. Still, they are trying to compare that to something John Green actually said to a female on twitter in an actual correspondence.

 

Do you see how far these pathetic losers will reach?

 

This new blog they created just for me isn't doing anything different than what is already going on. Just spin city all the way. And still no evidence to present. And what they do present, I already talk about so, what's the point? You know?

 

Okay CBL, you busted me! I mentioned in an interview that when I was 14 years old, I thought about becoming a porn star. OMG! You are such great investigative reporters! How did you come across that scoop? LOL Like I said, though it was an attempt of being humorous, even if it were real, what of it? A lot of young men think about doing it. Not to mention, I was "FOUTEEN YEARS OLD" when I said I thought about it. You want to defend your friend for having sex with an adult at age 14 by saying she was a child who didn't know any better? Okay, fine, that could be somewhat of a point, yet then you want to turn around and say that me (at 14) isn't a "child" who doesn't know better? ... Really? You want to show your two-faced hypocrisy that easy?

 

Let's take a look at their "About Page", shall we?

 

They start out by saying ... "We are a group of readers, writers, and book lovers who are tired of self-published author, Carroll Bryant, being able to post whatever he damn well pleases on his many blogs and with his socks."

 

Really? First of all, I have socks? And you can prove this? Because this is the first time I ever been accused of having socks. Wait! I do have socks! I admit it. I have like, 50 pairs of them. Wait! You don't mean those socks, do you? LOL I know what you mean. And again, evidence talks, bullshit walks (like bullies) - And now, about this "posting whatever I want" business - Do you mean like the posts on GenXpose? Or John Green's blog? Or all of the blogs you listed under the "History" page of Carroll Bryant?

 

So what you're saying is, it's okay for ALL of you to post what you want to, with or (the most standard practice) without evidence to support your lies? And opinions? But if I actually post evidence and give MY opinion, you people get tired of it? You see, what you really mean to say is, "We're tired of Carroll Bryant standing up to us and our lies and our posting about him and saying whatever the hell we want to say so we're creating this blog to show everyone that Carroll Bryant is a force to be reckoned with and we have no other counter measures to write about on our own blogs anymore so we created the "anti-Carroll Bryant" blog similar to the anti -STGRB blog in hopes to get him to stop defending himself against us."

 

You see, when you become a force to be dealt with, your enemies start grasping at straws and upping the pot. In this case, they created a whole entire blog dedicated to me and my three lies. LOL

 

They go on to say ... "Since he believes in naming and shaming people who disagree with him and he seems to have no problems with his own hypocrisy, we have no problem pointing out the logical flaws in his arguments."

 

I named people and shamed them who disagree with me? When? Calling me a pedophile isn't disagreeing with me. Calling me a racist isn't disagreeing with me. Writing posts that say I chase after underage girls isn't "disagreeing" with me. First of all, you people need to learn the meaning of disagreement. And the difference between that and "libel".  As for the hypocrisy part, what hypocrisy part? I have no problem at all with my hypocrisy part, only yours. LOL I never posted about your hypocrisy until you posted about me. I didn't make all of you people write articles about me. You did that of your own accord. Take your medicine when you're called out for the liars that you are. It isn't my fault that you lie about me, and decide to post it on your blogs. But seriously, you think this blog about me is going to prove your point? Trust me, it isn't. You still have to support your claims with evidence. You don't do that because lies don't come with screenshots and links. It either is true or it isn't. If it's true, you can prove it. If it isn't, you can't. End of story. So yes, please point out all my "logical flaws" - LMAO. (This should be good)

 

Now, let's just take a look at one of their biggest hypocritical statements on this new blog of theirs, shall we. This is what I mean when I say, "They make it too easy". LOL They say, ... " We believe in our Freedom of Speech, as well as Carroll's own rights. We have the right to share our opinions, as does he."

 

Then, they come right back with this ... "Carroll Bryant will NOT be allowed to post here."

 

I don't have to say anything further about that, do I? Of course not, we'll let the evidence speak for itself. (EVIDENCE!) LOL

 

You see, people of the "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog, that is what we call in the "sane" world as evidence. And it can be seen in the screen shot above.

My second lie is that of my age. Really? You're going to hate me because I dance around that? The only reason I dance around it is because it drives the bullies "crazy". LOL Don't ask me why because I don't know. I just know that it does. Drives them crazy, that is.

And my third lie is my writers name. LOL Yeah, they call that a lie. Like Jude Henderson isn't lying about her real name and she isn't even a writer? As Gump would say, "That's all I have to say about that."

Now let's take a look at "The History" of Carroll Bryant, shall we? Here is a screenshot of it.

 

 

 

First of all, this isn't "my" history, it's the history of all the posts made against me by the bullies and their supporters. It's other people's opinions and or flat-out lies" made against me. It's not my history, it's all of yours. All of you bullies. This is what I mean when I say these people haven't a clue. In none of these articles they list does anyone show any kind of evidence that supports any of their claims except for the fact that most of these articles talk about me posting "The List."

Really? Can't you people come up with anything "original"? You're going to keep beating that dead horse until you're blue in the face? (Or have we passed that already?) What a joke. Nice try guys, but this blog is about as lame as all your other blogs. And that's sad. I would have hoped this blog about me would be so much more. I deserve it! LOL Because - like you say - I'm a  narcissist. Wouldn't this blog just be "feeding" my narcissism? (Just asking)

I also noticed they added in the following post, "Self Control Is Lacking", that I have .. "Problems in sustaining satisfying relationships." - This is inaccurate. I have no problem at all having "satisfying" relationships. They are all somewhat "satisfying" to me. I think they meant to say "Long term" relationships. Which would be more closer to the truth. But the fact remains, I don't want a long term relationship so there-fore, that wouldn't be a problem. Of course, if they are talking about their friend Jude Henderson, you would have to talk to her about that. She is the one who seems to be "looking" for a long term relationship and yet, having a problem with them. At last count, her supposedly "ex" Daniel, cheated on her. Of course, I carry my own doubts about this Dan ever having been a real BF of hers. Jude is psychotic, more or less, so .....

 Their welcome post starts everything off in the proper direction. Instead of posting "lies" that I have said, they post a cat. LMAO A cat!!! Yeah, we'll take you seriously now. You posted a picture of a cat. That is so 13 years old of you. Here are a couple of shots of that post.

 

 

Here are a few interesting things they say that I would like to bring up. First we have this, ... "In a nutshell, this is our way of venting and pushing back at the drama that has surrounded a portion of the book loving community for quite some time. Many of us have been feeling like the Grumpy Cat and it is time for us to change that."

Really? This is your way of venting and pushing back? Pushing back against what? Defending myself against your original posts filled with lies about me in the first place? Then you push back when I actually go out and "defend" myself with "The Looking Glass?" - Really? Well here is a free education for you bullies. To push back, you first must be pushed. I never pushed you. You pushed me. Pushing first means "posting" about me first. I am the one who pushed back with this blog. Long after all of you already had your say - which was unwarranted and unfounded - now I have my say but you bullies, in your warped thinking, believe that by me defending myself against your original lies is me "starting" everything? And so now you're going to "push" back?

If I wouldn't know better, I would think I am actually making them look foolish with their lies about me. Trust me, I take this new blog in my honor as a "BADGE" to wear proudly. I really do. If you people at CBL need anything from me, let me know. I'll be glad to help. LOL

 Now let's take a look at this article called Carroll Bryant Goes After John Green - First of all, I went after him? No, more like he went after me first, then I defended myself and now he and his friends are coming after me again with this blog. Hey John, I can't help it if the truth makes you look stupid. That's not my fault. If you would have just left me alone to begin with then none of this would be happening right now. (Same for GenX and Amanda Welling) I mean, after all, you guys wrote about me first. That is pushing, by the way.

 

But check this out, in this article they say ... "Funny Carroll, you seem to love talking about these "bullies" as well. You see, we really hate the double standard with this guy. If you post about him, that isn't okay, but he seems to think he can say whatever he likes about other people with no consequence."

 

No, I don't think anyone can say anything about anybody and there be no consequence. There must be a consequence. And no, I don't like talking about you bullies. I have to talk about you because you people are "talking" about me first. Your blog posts went up first. Your accusations and lies went up first. I am merely defending myself from them. If you wouldn't have ever posted those things first then I wouldn't have ever created "The Looking Glass". Can't you see this? And how is it a double standard for me to talk about you AFTER you guys talk about me? I don't get it. And FYI, I don't say "whatever" I like, I post mostly your own words through "screenshots" and use your own words against you. if you don't want me to do that (like I am doing now with your new blog about me) then shut up. Whatever I do say about you people (the bullies) is in defense of what you say to begin with. How is it that you bullies do not see this? No wonder they forbid me to comment on their blog with my name. LOL They can't handle logic. Or truth.

 

Here is their common issue with "Carroll". LOL (Me)

 

"He has the bad habit of putting everyone in the same basket. For him, anyone who makes a negative, contradictory statement about him or one of his books, is a bully. And don't you know? All bullies are the exact same. We have seen this from Carroll time and time again. If one person posts or says something about him, he holds every person who ever opened their mouth about him accountable too."

 

No, I don't care if someone makes a negative comment about me or my books. But calling me a pedophile, a rapist (Like Zoe called me) or a racist is not a "negative" comment about me, it is libel. Learn the difference. And this is what I am defending myself against. As for my books, I don't care if anyone likes them or not. But writing a fake review is bullying in my book and I stand by that. Rating a book you never read is bullying in my book and I stand by that. Or writing a "book review" and talking about the author instead is bullying in my book and I stand behind that. And yes, you bullies are the same. You bully. That's why you're the same. And yes, I do hold everyone accountable for what they say, especially if what they say is a lie. I mean, first of all, why even say anything about me if you don't know me? If you say something about someone, then expect that someone to confront you about it. If you can't deal with that, then here is a suggestion .... Stop talking about me!

 

And that coming straight from a narcissist. LOL

 

I know what you're asking right now, "But Carz, is there more?" - The answer is yes, unfortunately, there is more. They then go onto say this ... "Take the young girl, Jude, who had the bloody misfortune of being Carroll's first victim in this whole mess. A year later, he is still talking about her even though she hasn't said a word to him and he continues to drag her name through the mud on his new blog. Hell, he even has her slated on his calendar."

 

Okay, first off, "young girl Jude?" You make seem like a child. (Maybe mentally she is, but I digress) She is a 19 year old "adult". (Can you see their spinning ways?) Then they use the word "bloody" as if to indicate I physically harmed her. (Spin city) Then they say "first" victim. (From what I can tell, she is the ONLY victim they seem to talk about. They way they put it, there are other "victims" out there. But who are they?) Can you see this spin? The answer is of course, there are no "victims" and not even Jude is a victim, much less, a bloody one. LOL (Unless it's that time of month in which case, I retrack everything) LOL

 

Yes, I am still talking about her, but it hasn't been a year later yet. (Spin city) It's only been about eight months. Eight months since she stalked me on my shared blog by befriending my best friend and manipulating her to be an admin on it. (All of this without my knowledge. Jude wanted it to be a secret)   But yes, I am still talking about her because she is the one who started this whole thing against me by posting alleged emails that I supposedly sent to her. (I have proof of that and it is coming up so ....) And hasn't said a word to me? How about this for "Having not said a word to me in a year"

 

Here is a screenshot of an email that I got from a girl calling herself "Angela" but in truth, after isolating her ISP - turns out that her ISP is exactly the same as ... Ahem .... Jude's.

 

Now, Angela and I never spoken before until around August. She was on my friend list when I was on Goodreads and she became friends with me about a month before Jude stalked my blog. Keep in mind that I had blocked Jude from emailing me first. But once all of this broke out, and after I got banned from Goodreads, this Angela girl started emailing me like we were best friends. I played along, even when I knew it was Jude. I wanted to see where she would take it. But right about mid January of this year was the last time I heard from "Angela", after I decided to "call her out". Ever since then, our daily emails went to ZERO!

Nice try Jude.

 

And to further showcase the irresponsibility of the people behind this blog, in their post "Self Control Is Lacking" they mention this about my exposing the sexual role-plays on Goodreads. "Carroll Bryant wasn't the first author who talked about these groups on Goodreads that participated in those kinds of activities and we can't say for sure that Goodreads updated their policy because of him. The timing is suspicious, we will give him that much."

 

The timing is suspicious? Really? Even after Patrick Brown emailed me and asked to see all of my evidence - which you can read here Goodreads: The Aftermath Of Shame - and even with the screenshot of Patrick's email to me, you still want to believe it could have just been the "timing"? And that Goodreads was already going to do something? LOL Really?

 

Do you all see the "stupid bully hate" I am up against here?

 

And then say this ... "Carroll seems to think that he should gain some kind of recognition for bringing these issues into the light, so to speak. Honestly, we didn't see much (if any) concrete evidence that actual children were participating in these sexual role-play groups, ..."

 

Really? You have screenshots of me saying that I am a hero and I should be given all the credit for breaking this story? Well, in case you don't. let me give one for you, "I should be given credit for breaking the story because ..... I broke the effing story!" LOL Then they say that Patrick offered me an "Olive" branch. First of all, no he didn't. Asking me for help to do his job is not an "olive" branch. And speaking of "Olive" branches, I offered this in November/December on my other blog to the bullies - none of you accepted that. Now you're stealing my "olive branches" from me? Really?

An olive branch from Patrick would be if he offered to allow me back on Goodreads (which I would decline) and that he offered to rid GR of you bullies. (Which I would accept) That would be an "olive branch".

 

 

Okay, I am ending this here. I think I made my point about this new blog named after me. And as a narcissist, this makes me feel pretty awesome. LOL As for those "Angela" emails, I have all of these emails stored. We may be taking a look at those in future posts. There are some strange similarities I wish to focus on which involve GenX, Amanda and Jude. (Two people pretending to be three. Four if you count the "Angela" persona) But that is in the future. Anyhow, you should go and check out this new blog called "Carroll Bryant Lies". It's really just John's, GenX's and Amanda's way of "striking back against me for standing up for myself to begin with from their initial attacks" LOL And pointing out all of their lies to begin with.

 

Did you get that?

 

What's wrong Amanda, that lawyer thing not working out for you?

 

 

 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is the Looking Glass.

 

 

 

Things we learned today: 

 

* Carroll is a narcissist

 

* Somebody really has it bad for me to honor me with a blog

 

* Jude and GenX may have a new persona called "Angela"

 

* The bullies think GR's new role-play policy and my breaking the story on it is "suspicious". LOL

 

* Carroll lied about his looks by posting a fake picture of himself as a joke that went too far (Get a rope)

 

* Carroll lies about his age (Get another rope)

 

* Carroll uses a "fake" name to write under (Any rope left?)

 

* A 19 year old Jude constitutes her being a "young girl"

 

* The bullies couldn't stand it that I stood up for myself with this blog against their attacks so they started a new blog dedicated to me to counter my defense.

 

* Can't take a blog serious when they post pictures of cats

 

* The people who started "Carroll Bryant Lies" could be 13 years old (Mentally)

* The bullies don't know what an "olive branch" is

* The bullies can't get enough of Carroll Bryant

 

 

* Seriously though, John Green, GenX, Jude, Amanda Welling, all of you need some serious mental help. You really do. This is no joke, mental illness is a serious issue and I plead with you from the bottom of my heart to seek for and receive that help.

 

Oh, and thanks for the blog. I am honored.  

 

 

  

 

 

John Green

So, I’m hanging on the net and stumble across this. It’s an irresponsible article by John Green. Understand, I don’t know John Green. I can’t recall having ever talked to him before. That’s not to say that we didn’t, but I can’t seem to recall it. (Just covering my ass here. As I reported in “Genxpose Part One”, these people seem to think that if they leave a comment for you on your blog or something, it means that “you know each other.”) Anyway, he has decided to get into the fray without any provocation from me. (Funny how these bullies love writing about me.)

It appears to be some kind of an attempt at good journalism, I don’t know. I’m not a professional journalist so I can’t very well say. The article itself is just another round of “Blah, blah, blah, STGRB, blah, blah, blah, Carroll Bryant, blah, blah, blah, *Tears*, and ends with a blah.”

Actually, it talks about the fact that GenXpose has (had) an open post policy and that I came out of “nowhere” and abused it. (Carroll, you big meanie!)

Here is an excerpt where he mentions me.

“Their latest bout of utter insanity occurred when out of nowhere, disgraced author and STGRB coattail rider Carroll Bryant began attacking the people behind the Genxpose blog, simply because they’d linked to a statement he’d made on his site regarding STGRB being temporarily offline. His tirade culminated in a threat to doc-drop, or doxx (reveal their personal & private details online) one of the site hosts. Oddly enough, STGRB, which claims to denounce and despise such behavior, not only never checked him on it but tacitly supported it. They accepted his insane- and utterly unfounded- assumption on Gen X’s identity at face value (though have since backtracked by deleting some of the references to it) and continue to allow him a platform to spout further nonsense from.”

Now let’s just hold our damn horses here, cowboy. Didn’t the screenshots in my article “GenXpose Part One” show that is was GenX who first emailed me? I didn’t appear out of nowhere. She did! Clearly, John Green hasn’t a clue. Most of these bullies don’t. And disgraced? I’m not disgraced in the slightest. At least, I don’t feel disgraced. And “STGRB coattail rider”? Oh, you mean like you riding the coattails of GenX now? Okay, I can live with that. Well, aren’t we just two peas in a pod Johnny? Look at us coattail riders jerking each other off here. Fancy that.

Then he goes on to rant:

 “As the screenshots clearly show, it was done simply as a point of reference, yet he interpreted it as a personal attack and began ranting and raving in the comments section of the post. Genxpose has a very liberal posting policy: to promote discourse they don’t mod or screen comments, so like Las Vegas what happens there stays there- but for all to see. Bryant pathologically ignored this fact while shuttling between STGRB and Genxpose, claiming that he’d been blocked from the site even while he was still posting on it (note the dates in each screenshot).”

You’re dang tootin’ I took offensive to it, GenX is a bully. When a bully mentions my name, I’m not taking it lightly. I took it as a personal attack because it was a personal attack, just like your personal attack on me, John Green. When you mention me in the sound of a whisper in a negative way, it’s on! None of you have any business period to write about me. Every time you do, I am always linked to one of your asinine conspiracy theories. That’s where it always leads. Then your gang of thugs come in to comment, and start tossing around the expletives, rumors and lies like they were candy covered kisses from grand-ma-ma.

Now, let’s advance to the next lie. The one where he says I claimed that my comments were blocked when I was still posting on it. Well John, they were. At least one of them was. It occurred right after Cherie said this.

Then yes, I did scoot over real quick and posted it on STGRB. What of it? You got  a problem with that tough guy? Too bad. Tell grand-ma-ma, she has some candy covered kisses for you bub. (Mmm, yummy)

But the ban on my comments didn’t last long. Here is my thoughts on what I think went down, given what lack of information I have. Cherie blocked me. Said something to GenX about it. She quickly un-did the ban and in true GenX fashion, (as evidence presented in “GenX Part One” revealed about her honesty tactics) she went into damage control mode. (Translation: She told a fibbers)

But that’s okay, it’s no big deal. I just wanted to shed some light on John’s credibility (or lack thereof) as a blogger. (Or is that a journalist?) Nope, it has to be blogger because he got a lot of misinformation from GenX, took her word as gold and went and made a fool of himself. Well, how do like dem apples? (We like to have a little fun here, John. Take your sister’s panties off and stay for a while)

“OMG! He didn’t just say that, did he?”

“Oh no, he didn’t.”

And why did GenX close her comments down? Well, according to the next screen shot, it was because it was being abused.

Really GenX? Abuse? Can I take a look at just a few examples of this so called abuse?

Okay, that was a bit harsh there. I’ll agree to that. But in all honesty, no more or less offensive than what you and your friends say about me.

Am I making my point? Murderer or pedophile, does it really matter? They are both hideous. The interesting part is, you have no evidence what-so-ever to display that I chase after underage girls. But that doesn’t stop you and your gang of thugs does it? Oh, wait, that’s right, you’re bullies. You live under the bully rule of entitlement. (See my page “Traits Of A Cyber Bully”) It’s okay for you and your friends to say horrible (and yet, unfounded) garbage, but not for anyone else? I’m feeling you now, dog. (That’s an expression, not a racist remark.) You have to be careful with these people. They are great at the spin city game. (As well as misinformation)

I know what you’re saying. “Hey Carz, can we see some more abusive comments on GenX’s blog?”

“Well certainly, little camper. Check this one out.

OMG! How harsh was that?

Or was it comments like this GenX, that led you to close your comments? Where an Anon responds to GenX claiming that “comments are so abusive” towards me, yet the ones aimed at Carroll is okay? (Pick and choose, that’s all it is.)

I don’t know if it was remarks such as that which led her close her blog comments. I think it comes down to “agree with me, otherwise, it‘s abusive,” I don’t know, I’m asking. Anyhow, it would so appear that abuse equals “Anybody who doesn’t agree with me.” (See “Traits Of A Cyber Bully” on my pages section)

I bet you don’t have a problem with this one though, do you GenX?

Of course not, they were talking about me. Isn’t that right, GenX? (Rhetorical, stay in your seat)

Nor do I think you have a problem with these comments.

My favorite is the one I circled with blue. You know, where nobody even knows if you’re a guy or a girl. Or if your name is even Amanda (Welling) or not. Oh yes, GenX, you have us all so confused. You’re such a grown up spy. Master of disguise.

Or maybe more like a cowardly bully who hides behind a computer screen and a fake name because she doesn’t want the world to know who she is. Because then everyone would know the truth behind your lies. And of course, one of those lies is that I am a stalker. Well, let’s take a look at “my stalkers”, shall we?

And the stalking continues as they make comments about one of my blog journal’s

Man, it’s a good thing I pack heat. I might have to use it to protect myself from one of these un-popped kernels someday, or maybe one of their boyfriends. What with all of this attention they are showing me, you just know one of them is bound to get jealous.

You know who makes the best stalker don’t you? An investigative reporter. (GenX) And a investigative reporter “in training” and “court attorney wanna-be“? (Kev) 

A special note to the comment circled in blue. Taking shots at my middle name. Really? Can we say “obsessed much”?

Then there is this comment. Pay attention to this remark - “He claims to be stalked, but as far as I see it, he is the one going to all of the blogs trying to resurrect a little fame for himself ….”  

Really? Here is a little FYI - I go to these blogs to DEFEND MYSELF from you people. Not to stalk you. If you would stop posting about me in the first place I wouldn’t even be there. (And GenX posted about me first. We have already proven that in “GenX Part One“) Unlike you people which I have also shown that you stalk me and the posts I make that don’t even concern you to begin with. Who’s the stalker now? I go to blogs to defend myself, you go to mine for what reason? 

**Cue crickets**

For what reason? 

**Shut up crickets**

That’s what I thought.  

Give it a rest Nancy Drew (a.k.a.- GenX). We know who you are. More importantly, we know what you are. A fraud. A liar. And John Green’s dominatrix. 

“OMG! Did he just call John Green her bitch?”

“Oh no he didn’t!”

“Snap!”

Where’s grand-ma-ma when you need her most?

Update! I have managed to capture this screenshot of Marine John Green. It would appear that his foot isn’t the only thing he likes to put in his mouth. Bon appetite’ John. Looking for a date, are you? Don’t fill up too much, you might want to make room for some Jell-O. Wait! What am I thinking? There’s always room for - Jell-O! 

I give him this much, he sure does know how to sweet talk the ladies, doesn’t he? And on that note, I will leave you fine folks with these screenshots of Marine John Green bullying author Sharon Desruisseaux on her own personal space. (Known as her Goodreads blog) 

I’m Carroll Bryant - And this is The Looking Glass.

  Things we learned today

* John Green is an irresponsible blogger/journalist and GenX’s bitch (allegedly) 

* GenX is a dominatrix (allegedly)

* I pack heat (Not allegedly)

* Faulkner is spinning in his grave (allegedly) 

* I go to blogs to defend myself / They come to mine to stalk me (not allegedly)

* Kev wants to be an investigative reporter (allegedly) and quite possibly an attorney.

* Crickets are cool (allegedly)

* GenX closed the comments on her blog (Not allegedly)  

* I referenced Nancy Drew (True Story)

* Grand-ma-ma has candy covered kisses (And They Are Yummy) But not as yummy as Jell-O? 

* John is looking for a date