In this first shot, there is a lot to cover.
She starts it out by saying a few days ago, she wrote about her experiences with me. Forgetting to note that it was she who brought that experience about by writing about me first and so on. She also goes on to say I "freaked" out over her post. No, Amanda, I didn't freak out. I saw some lies and misinformation on your post that I felt should be cleared up. If you or anyone else wishes to write about me, then at least do so with the truth and not lies. But rest assured, your post where you call me your stalker was you freaking out. The truth is, you are my stalker and the evidence supports it. I notice you do not supply any evidence to support your claims.
Amanda then posts a warning to her followers informing them that if they leave comments on her blog, I will take snapshots and post about it on mine. This is yes and no. Yes to the fact that if her followers insult me and lie about me and libel me, I will focus on it. However, if they didn't do this, I wouldn't give two shits. So no, just because someone leaves a comment doesn't mean I will snapshot it. Only when they come after me in their comments will I do this. You don't see my followers / supporters libeling you, do you? No, I don't think you will. There lies the difference between you and me and the comapny we keep. My followers also do not wish you or anyone else dead. You say you don't want your followers harassed for their opinion. Libeling me with lies is not an opinion. Just saying.
She also mentions that she was getting a lot of traffic and comments on her blog posts coming from my blog after she wrote her article about me and someone linked to it in a comment from my blog. Yes she asked me to remove that link, but no I did not. Again, I wanted her posts about me off her damn blog but she sure as shit wasn't about to accommodate me with that, now did she? And again, that is her "self entitlement" that bullies like her carry around. That they can post whatever the hell they want to about me but they'll be damned if anyone can leave a link to it on my blog in the comments section. Nothing but entitlement.
Amanda goes on to mention that there are several types of predators. That she didn't mean that I was a sexual predator. However, that was what everybody else was writing and saying and what other type of predator would she be referring to? Notice she never explains that. The bottom line is simple, any predator is basically a bad thing. I know it. She knows it. Everyone reading this knows it. So for you to defend yourself on calling me a predator Amanda is moot. You still said it. You still had no evidence to back it up. It is still libel. It is still wrong. And it is still you striking first for absolutely no effing reason at all! The more you ramble on, the more everyone sees the GenX in you.
You mention also Amanda that you think that I think that by you coming to my blog and requesting that I remove a link someone left in the comments section to your blog is what I call you stalking and harassing me. Well, what would you call it after someone writes something about you for no reason then gets pissed off because a link was left on the blog of the person you wrote about and libeled? It is stalking and harassing. You wrote about me on your blog then you came to mine crying for me to remove a link that was left to the post about me on your effing blog. How is that not stalking me? Harassing me? Especially when you consider that in that blog post of mine, (Internet Terrorists: Ignorance Run A-muck) and even after you wrote about me, I never effing mentioned you period! Not once!
So yeah, you are the real stalker and harasser.
And let us not forget in the previous post I wrote, "Amanda Welling: Amanda Condones Murder", I showed a screenshot of one of your comments where you threatened to bully me! And blamed me for being bullied. Those screenshots don't lie, do they?
Yes, when you go on to say that I consider it continued harassment when you left a FAKE review of my book on my reviews, what would you call it? You didn't read the book. Your review had nothing to do with the book but retaliation and further harassment against me. There's no other way to look at it because it was uncalled for. You said in your review that I like to harass reviewers yet I have never harassed anyone period! And you have no proof to support this claim or else you would have posted it. So basically, you lied which is, in any book, harassing me. Had you actually read the book, and didn't go after me in your review with your libelous comments, then maybe we'd be singing a different tune here, now wouldn't we?
You say you see your review as being honest about my behavior so again I will request that you present evidence that I attacked a reviewer. If you can't do that, then you are not honest, are you? And I'm not talking about one of your bully friends who also libeled me in their review or clearly didn't read the book, but an honest and unbiased reviewer. I never ever did any such thing and you have no proof to show to back up your so called honesty.
Now let's take a look at the rest of her follow up post about me.
She says that she doesn't think it's okay to be bullied. If this is true Amanda, then why did you threaten to bully me a year ago? Why did you even initially write about me? Why did you comment on GenXpose hate blog against me? All of this took place before I ever uttered the name Amanda Welling. How much of your bullying was you expecting me to take?
As for you being disgusted and have no words about my rape reference, of course you're speechless, it was a good comparison to your "Carroll asked to be bullied" comment.
Then you say that I think I know you. Well, one could say that about you where it concerns me. You think you know me so you write about me and call me a stalker and a predator without any proof. Are you saying that if I started writing about you first, that you wouldn't have any reason to respond? Well, look at what you're doing now. You're responding to my defense posts. Imagine if I had done what you did and wrote about you first and commented on your blog and on other blogs calling you a stalker and predator without any proof. I don't think you would sit quiet either. In fact, I know you wouldn't yet you condemn me for doing it.
And yes, I did call the police. They saw the same thing I did where your friend says "Someone should put him out of his misery."
You try and defend this by saying it is an ambiguous statement? And can be taken a few different ways? Then you say I need to take medication for my bipolar? And you claim that if I did that then none of this misery would be going on? Me taking medication isn't going to make you change.
First of all, who the hell are you to assume you know me? And FYI - not all bipolar conditions need to be treated with meds. There are various conditions and levels of bipolar. Look who I am talking to, Miss "Know It All".
But yes, it was an ambiguous statement and yes it could be taken a few different ways. However, the police took it the same way I did. Maybe you can advise them to take their medication too. And your adolescent and feeble attempt to make me appear as some lonely and miserable old man is exactly the type of bully statement a bully would make. First you condemn me for thinking that I know you then you turn around and assume you know me. Like I said earlier, the more you ramble on .....
Then you invite the police to come to you? To look at your so called evidence against me? I would love to see it. I bet they are all defense statements, right? Talk about obsessive behavior. But I will say this to you, be careful for what you ask for, you just might get it. Always remember Amanda, you struck first, and second, and third before I struck back. This is all the evidence law enforcement will need to see. That you started it and persisted. That is the evidence I have presented in my previous post about you.
Then you say something very key when you say: "My mistake was to ever let Carroll Bryant know that I existsed."
Indeed! And you let me know that too, didn't you? ... Yes, you sure did. But my question to you Amanda is .... why? Why was it so important for you to let me know who you were by writing about me, commenting on my blog and attacking me on GenXpose hate blog in the comments? Why Amanda, why? ... Trust me when I say, I would have rather you not done that and not stood up for me to notice you. There was no reason for it so again, why did you do all that to begin with?
You say your regret is not taking your own advice with dealing with internet predators. I wish you would have given me that advice then I would have known how to deal with you. You came after me, and that is what a real predator does. They go after others. I didn't go after you, you came after me. I only defended myself against your attack. So yes, let's hope you and the police meet. All the evidence of who went after who first is documented right here on the internet. And your very own words in comments you left behind.
You end your pathetic butt-hurt post with: "Don't make the same mistake I did by engaging with your stalker."
Amanda, you engaged with me before I ever knew who you were. That has been proven! There is no doubt about it girl, you are the one who needs to take some medication. You are the one who is lonely and miserable inside. You are the one lying. You are the one who needs help.
And you are the one who needs to be arrested and stopped. You are the real internet stalker here. That has already been shown. Funny how you can't show it with evidence, the other way around. Can you? .... Sounds like a natural born liar to me.
I'm Carroll Bryant .... (bipolar and all - with the truth - and evidence to back it up) and this is The Looking Glass.
Things We Learned Today:
* The same thing we already learned - that Amanda Welling is a liar