Coming Attractions For March 2013

As my first month winds down, we can get resettled in our seats and brace ourselves for March. There are some very interesting things to ponder. The in10sity is almost too much, wouldn't you agree? Anyhow, here are some things to look forward to. We're just going to keep plugging away until the bullies stop. I don't care if it takes a hundred years. I'll stop when they stop. Then, and only then, will this madness be over.

Oh, one more thing, in John Greens latest post, he says I would know the meaning of "Marine Corp" if I had served. He thinks I never served in the military. LOL Hey John, once again, you suck at getting information. I served in two branches of the armed forces. TWO! LOL Looks like I win again. Hahahaha Better luck next time, champ.

This is just classic bully behavior. Proof that they are lazy about doing their homework and fact checking. They just say whatever comes to mind and it flies right out of their mouth. Hell, they don't even hope that what they say is true, they just pretend it is. And this kind of stupidity runs rampant in the bully community. It further illustrates how little they even know about me.

Okay, now the coming attractions for March 2013.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 1st, 2013 - "Amanda Welling"

Synopsis:

A look at a woman and her husband who claim they have nothing to do with me yet, the evidence will show otherwise. We'll also see how Amanda just flat-out lies! A husband and wife team gets "Exposed" GenX style.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 3rd, 2013 - "StLouisKiss Is Amiss"

Synopsis:

And by amiss I mean, muddled. To the extreme. While you'll scratch the hairs right off of your head with this one, we do finally put the puzzle together as to who GenX's identity is. We should thank StLouisKiss for that.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 6th, 2013 - "The Legend Of Carroll Bryant"


Synopsis:

I take a more in-depth look at irresponsible reporting of amateur bloggers, and address issues of concern within their reports. I also ask the question: Are some people just looking for attention? Fame? Off my name? Read and find out. Then you make the call. And we learn a little bit about Jude Henderson. You won't want to miss it. The truth from her own words!

------------------------------------------------------------------------


March 8th, 2013 - " Mystery Loaf "

Synopsis:

Big things come in small packages. Like on Valentine's Day ladies when you wait anxiously by the mailbox for your gift from your number one guy. He mentioned something special that he knows you been waiting for all these years of dating, and now it would seem he wants to take that next step. This makes you so excited. You know what you want, and it's about time the bastard figured it out. You certainly dropped enough hints. You told him once that your favorite song was "Ring of Fire" by Johnny Cash. You told him when you were a little girl, you loved playing "Ring Around The Rosey". And you definitely told him your favorite scary movie of all time is "The Ring!" (Are you listening boyfriend?) Then he appears, the mailman. He's walking towards you. He is carrying a package. You're about to pee your pants. He hands you the box. You take it in a swoop and race back inside the house and plop on the couch, ripping the package open. And then you see it. It's a key on a chain - and a message on a card that reads: "Hey sweetie, happy Valentine's Day. Here is a key to my apartment. Now you don't have to knock or wait for me to get home. Love you." - Charlie.

Yeah, it's kind of like that. Only better.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

March 10th, 2013 - "Sad Times At GenX High"

Synopsis:

You know about "Fast Times At Ridgemont High" - Well, this isn't Ridgemont, it's "GenX", so no Spicoli  Just a lot of Mr. Hand.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

March 15th, 2013 - "Patrick Brown and Blackmail"

Synopsis:

I take a look at the Goodreads ToS and ask the question, "Why doesn't Patrick Brown and or Otis Chandler enforce it?" We also get to meet two bullies first hand, Ade and Belle, as well as others who like to "put foot in mouth". Fake reviews by Martha D and Coaxial, a very bully thing to do.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 26th - "Jude Henderson: In Her Own Words"

Synopsis:

Screenshots of messages from Jude.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AC/DC - Thunderstruck!

He Loves Us (Hitler's Of The Internet)

Well, it didn't take CBL long to read my post about them creating a WHOLE blog in my honor. They took to their keyboards and came up with a post all of their own without stealing anymore of my lines. Good for them! And they went on to address the unusual bull.

They claim to feel special. Well good news, you people are special. (Little Yellow Bus Special) That aside, they claim that I am not a force to be reckoned with. I guess that's why they started that blog about me. (Because I'm not a force) Usually, when someone dedicates a WHOLE blog to one person, it is because that person is a force. But since they don't see it like that, perhaps a JUDE HENDERSON blog would be in order? You know, since making a blog dedicated to one person isn't "creepy" at all.

I slogged through their whine about me and I have a few comments of my own. Let's go through them, shall we?

1) They seem to think I pulled some names out of the hat to come up with my assumption of who is behind the "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog. They can't seem to see the logic as to why I assume it could be GenX, Amanda Welling, John Green and or Jude Henderson. So lets take a look at why I think logically that it could be any one of them or all of them.

First of all, GenX (Amanda Welling) came out of nowhere and started stalking me. I never had any interactions with her beyond her commenting a few times on my blog and on STGRB. When I showed everyone that it was in fact GenX who first approached me and made first contact (when she was claiming it was the other way around) I think I pissed her off royally for showing everyone the truth. (You can read about here GenXpose Part One.) So logically, she would be a good candidate to upstart this CBL blog.

Next, we have Amanda Welling, whom I believe is GenX in disguise. Why? Because her husband is Mepis and he has posted on the GenXpose blog. (As well as mine) And he has emailed me as "Mepis". (As will be shown on March 1st post called "Amanda Welling") But because of his email threats and his obvious anger about exposing his wife as having the sock "GenX" - he and her would be prime candidates of starting the CBL blog, if by chance GenX isn't Amanda, or even if she is. Now that is logical, also when considering that GenX brought in some new people to blog on her GenXpose blog, which would open the door for her to have more time writing on the CBL blog.

Then of course there is John Green and the post I did on him that made him look both, like the fool bully he is and a bit of a pervert. He would logically be a prime candidate to "strike back" with the CBL blog.

And then we have Jude Henderson, the girl that started it all by sharing emails with everyone way  back when and getting these bullies all fired up to attack me on Goodreads. She is obviously hating me because I refuse to allow people to forget the fact that she was behind it all. She sits in the shadows and continues to stalk me and my blogs, emailing me as one of her socks "Angela" for several months and so, yeah, she would be a logical choice to be behind the CBL blog.

So, as you can see, there is logic behind my "obvious" choices. That and the fact that whomever is really behind it, seems to afraid to "show" themselves. But why be afraid? Of little ole me? Really? So say what you want CBL, the fact that you are in HIDING proves that you think I am a force to be reckon with. That and the fact that you started a WHOLE blog just for me. Think about it, when STGRB became a force, they (the bullies) started the blog "Stop The STGRB Bullies". (And look what a joke that blog turned out to be.)

Then they say this ... "We can't blame Jude for using an alias." - Really? And why is it that she does use an alias? ... "Carroll Bryant is the perfect example why everyone should consider protecting their identity. Who would want someone like Carroll knowing their name, date of birth, place of residence, etc? We keep our identities secret to protect ourselves from him and others like him. There is nothing wrong with that." - Really again? You mean, like GenX (Amanda Welling) posting this on her blog about Athena?

It sure does look like it's GenX going that extra mile to "uncover" people's address, phone number and other personal information - and posting it online for the whole world to see - not me. You can scour all my blogs top to bottom and you won't find anything like that. If you still need to see for yourself, just follow this link STGRB Facts, Rumors and Speculation. It is there you will discover all of GenX's (Amanda Welling's) hard work of "stalking" STGRB, Athena and Melissa. It makes me ask the question, what normal person does that?

Then they "attack" a post on my other blog. One that is part of my "Teen Idol" series. They posted a cat on one of their posts to mock me, which makes no sense, then I said "You can't take a blog serious when they post a picture of a cat" so their response to that remark is this ... " If posting a picture of cat makes you unprofessional and immature. surely, posting a picture of Justin Bieber makes you the same, if not worse. How old are you, again? That's right. You've lied about that so many times, as well."

First of all, the post wasn't about a cat, but you used a cat picture, that makes no sense. As for me posting pictures of The Biebs" - It was for a post about "The Biebs" so .... who's picture should I have used? You mean to tell me that he isn't a "Teen Idol?" After all, that is part of an ongoing series of posts I am doing about Teen Idols. Really? You're going to compare a post about using a cat picture on a post you wrote about me, to a post I did about Justin Bieber and using his pictures on the post about him? Oh, and what does age have to do with anything? Because I am "old" I can't write posts about famous teenagers? This is your argument?

I can hear all of my readers laughing - even from this distance.

 

Wow! Talk about reaching for something and coming up empty.

 

Then they make it absolutely clear that ...  "John Green was talking with a PORN STAR about sexual play. We think a porn star would be comfortable talking about that sort of thing since, you know, she's a porn star."

 

Yeah, she's a porn star, that doesn't exactly help his image, does it? Thanks for the FYI.

 

Then they move on to this statement. "The words you use have meaning. For instance, in the interview question Carroll states, "But ever since I was about 14 years old, I always thought about going into the adult film business." Carroll did not say, "When I was 14 years old, I thought about going into the adult film business." See the difference? We hope so. It's not about lacking a sense of humor. We just do not find it funny. We also don't think that stealing a model's photo is funny and passing it off as your own is funny."

 

Really? You're going to nit-pick? Well of course you are, that's what bullies do. That's your job. Fine, I'll remember that for future reference. So when it comes time to use it against you, I don't want to hear your whine. And of course YOU don't find it funny. You people don't find anything funny. You're bullies. That's your job. To NOT have a sense of humor. It's kind of hard to have one when you're so full of hate. And again, still on that "model's pic"? Really? It would seem you would move past that as I have already explained it. But again, that's not your job, is it? Bullies let NOTHING go. They get stuck on the past. Isn't that like you people getting on me for still talking about Jude? Not letting go the past? Only for you, it's that "model pic". Well, here is a news flash - nobody cares! (Except for you bullies) But then again, that would fall under the "no sense of humor" category, wouldn't it? You people need to just let that go. I owned it. Which is more than any of you ever owned up to, that's for sure. See, you say I don't own up to nothing so you rag me for it, then I own it and you still rag me - Nobody can win with you bullies. Nothing is ever good enough for you.

 

Then they address this issue:  "We do believe that Carroll has socks and no, not the kind you put on your feet. Carroll still clambers around Goodreads and we believe he has at least one open account there even though he claims he has no interest in regaining his banned account. We know that he has had at least one account he wasn't supposed to have and we don't believe for a second that he actually deleted it."

 

Well, let's just assume for the moment you're right, that I do have an open account on Goodreads, that would be one, singular, where as you said "socks" (plural) You would still be wrong. (See, I said I would remember it and hold you to your "word" exactly as written like you did me and I am holding it against you.) But I digress, you only "believe" I have socks. You still have no proof. But does that stop you from saying anything? Hell no. Because a bullies job is to lie and libel at every turn. You bullies have the bully code down to a science. But yes, I deleted it. However, to show you I really don't give a rats tail, I will be creating a new one when I get back from vacation and go in search of more sexually explicit role playing between adults and minors, just to see if "Patrick Brown" really cleaned it up. And if I find it, I will post it again. More evidence. So chew on that.

 

Then they say this. "Carroll Bryant isn't allowed to post here for one reason. He has his own space where he can post. In fact, he has a handful of blogs where he can post whatever he wants to post. It's nothing hypocritical. All we are saying is that he doesn't need to do it here. Maybe if he doesn't like our rules, he should talk to STGRB? They have very similar rules. Pot calls the kettle black, wouldn't you say?"

 

Yes, I have a handful of blogs (four to be exact) and two of them is strictly my writing and my original blog I no longer talk about you bullies or address you. This is why I started this blog. But you make a blog about someone (me) and don't even allow that someone (me) to respond on it? To address your lies? And what does STGRB have to do with anything? I can't control what they do or how they run their website. I have no power there. I have no say-so what-so-ever. But you're still going to hold their policies against me? Well of course you are, because you're bullies. That's your job. But that's okay, I have this blog to address your lies and I am placing bets that that will be enough.

 

Then they go on with this statement: "Carroll not only lacks self-control, he also lacks reading comprehension. In our last post, we listed common traits of narcissists. We never said all apply to Carroll. He seems to think we did. It's okay. Nobody is perfect."

 

You pretty much insinuated. I mean, when you call somebody a narcissist, you've pretty much covered it all. I don't seem to think you did .... You just did.

 

Then they pretty much wrap it up with this: "Lastly, Carroll might want to remember why everyone started speaking up about him in the first place. Is it amnesia? Old age setting in? Denial? With 100% certainty, Carroll did something very wrong that led to bloggers and readers all over the globe pissed off. Just check out his history in our menu bar. And yes, Carroll, that is your history. We are sorry you won't own it, but it is yours."

 

Now let's just assume I actually did do something wrong. Who put you bullies in charge to be my "judges, jury and executioners?" I mean, people make mistakes all the time, or am I the only one? But more importantly, what did I do wrong? What was it that I did (that you can prove) that was so God awful that you bullies have to go and try and ruin my career as a writer? ..... What? .... Did I kill someone? .... No. ..... What? .... Just because I played a bad joke with that "model pic" and it got out of control? Is it because I won't reveal my real age? Is it because when I started out I used a pen name? (Then later changed it to my real name) .... What? .... because some girl claims that I stalked her when I have evidence that shows she stalked me? On my shared blog? Manipulating a girl younger than her to do it? So she could get back at me for blocking her from emailing me anymore? Come on, what did I do? Because all those links you have are to other people who DON"T KNOW ME or THE TRUTH about what really happened. They are just speculating and lying just like you are. But again, even if I did do something wrong, who made you Gods of internet world and other people's reputations and lives and careers to which you try to ruin? Are you saying that you people (the bullies) are perfect and so shall we all be? What?

 

You see, it doesn't matter if you're right or not, you still have no right at all to crucify people on your "holier than thou" cross. It's not your responsibility to go around and "Judge" others. God is watching you. And this is exactly what you are doing to me and other authors out there - You're "judging" them, then finding them guilty without just cause and then ... you and your bully gang goes out and do everything you can to "destroy" them. That is living with hate in your hearts and again, if there is a God, that God is watching. because according to the word of the bible and the Lord himself, "He is the one who do all the judging." - Not to mention - "Hate the sin, not the sinner."

 

But you see, this is the point, it doesn't matter if I did anything wrong - You still have no right to do what you people go around doing. You need to let it go. You need to stop hating so much. You really do. All of you bullies. Jude included.

 

Then they end their post with this: *This is the longest post you will ever see on our site. Well, hopefully. It's a semi-promise."

Seeing is believing. But with these bullies, not only can all they make are semi-promises, but you can't believe a single thing they say. Apparently, they are perfect. And they are the internet-worlds "Judges, Jury and Executioners". So beware of them. They are the Hitler's of the internet.

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is the Looking Glass.

 

 

 

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

 

 

* The people behind "Carroll Bryant Lies" and their supporters are the "Hitler's of the Internet"

 

* The bullies are perfect

 

* The bullies are "Judge, Jury and Executioners" of authors

 

* The bullies don't like me posting about teen idols and or Justin Bieber

 

* The bullies are stuck on the "model pic"

 

* The "model pic" is all they have on me

 

* Jude Henderson stalked me on my shared blog

 

* The bullies think I have socks on Goodreads and they seem to think one is plural

 

* The bullies have no proof I didn't delete my old "sock" account I used to do my GR RP investigation

 

* GenX (Amanda Welling) is the one "doc-dropping"

 

* There is no evidence to suggest that Carroll doc-drops

 

* John Green talks to porn stars

 

* Carroll is going to start a "Jude Henderson" blog when he returns from California (because that wouldn't be creepy at all.) Or maybe he already did?

Carroll Bryant Lies & Spin City

This is what I am talking about when I say that Amanda Welling, her husband Jon and the rest of the bullies like to "spin" things around. One of the recent spins of theirs is something I said in the comment section of a blog called "The Runaway Pen" where blog owner T.L. Shreffler said the following in her article about me. (Check the screenshot.)

My response was this.

If you read T.L.'s article, you get the impression that she is implying that I solicited these bloggers for a review by sending my books first and then expecting something in return, which simply isn't the case. They solicited me first, telling me that they would like to give me a review and or an interview (or both) in exchange for a free read (or copy) of my book(s). To which, I accepted their offer and accommodated them by then sending my book(s) to them on their promise to read, review, and or give me an interview after they read the book(s).

Now, if you go by Jon and Amanda Welling (the people behind "Carroll Bryant Lies") they are trying to spin my comment around to make it appear as though I said I never sent the books at all when in fact, I did send the books to them, I just didn't send it to them first. They approached me.

And by the way, I never told Jude to go kill herself because her and her friends broke their promises to me to review my book(s) or interview me. There is still no evidence that this email even exists or wasn't doctored. I will be covering this "alleged" email in a future post in March. Why don't you post this email so we can see it? Or is it imaginary?

Here is a screenshot of Jon and Amanda trying to educate me on the procedures of how book reviews work. Note that they use "publishers" as an example. I am an independent as are most of the authors on Goodreads. And these bloggers didn't just approach me requesting to read my book(s) - They in turn "gave me their word" they would do a review and or interview. And again, I didn't post "The List" because these bloggers didn't do as they promised, I posted the list because Jude stalked me on my blog and used my friend to get to me.

Then they say that they think I am being childish by posting "The List". Here is what they say on their blog: "We also think it is incredibly immature to post a list of bloggers who supposedly declined to review  your books or interview you because of one person, Jude. That's some middle-school drama-llama stupidity."

Well, "Carroll Bryant Lies" - I think it is childish of Jude to stalk me on my own blog after using my best friend to do it.

But here is a thought: Who cares what you think Jon and Amanda Welling? Who the "F" are you to be my "Judge, Jury and Executioners?" Your blog(s) were never mentioned. So why do you even care? Just because you hate me? So you started a hate blog against me and don't even allow my supporters to comment on it?

Even in my comment on "The Runaway Pen" I state:  "I was APPROACHED by these people for a "free read" where they PROMISED in return, they would interview me on their blog and or review my book. I accepted their deal (promise) to which, some did not do as they promised me. Had they never approached me, I would have never sent them a "free read" because I never do that. I never approach anyone asking them to do anything for me."

But yes, I did indeed send these bloggers a free copy of my book(s) but only after they solicited me first and requested them in exchange for the review/interview.

And like I said, if you read T.L.'s article, you will see where she implies that I solicited the bloggers first "willy nilly" with expectations that they would just review and interview me. That scenario is not the case yet, "Carroll Bryant Lies" spins it around in their hate for me to make it seem like I said that I never sent them the books at all.

I think anyone with a 5th grade education can read the article, read my comment and know what I was saying. And this is yet another reason why you simply can't trust "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog for the truth. It is a hate blog against me and we all know this. They make it obvious. They will spin anything and everything around and take things out of context, just like the Jude Henderson emails that she posted and showed to all of her bully friends.

I have some upcoming posts that will be talking about this topic, "spinning" from the bullies with good examples to show you how they do it. As for Jon and Amanda Welling of "Carroll Bryant Lies", you're supposed to cover my lies, not tell them yourselves. If you really want to be taken serious, you have to produce ACTUAL proof of me lying, not spinning something that I said.

Of course, this might be why they don't allow comments on their blog that support me. They don't want the truth to come out even though, by their lying and spinning - the truth comes out anyway. They keep making themselves look more stupid with every post. They are obviously a hate blog. They know it. I know it. All of you reading this know it. And this is further evidence of how they spin everything around and flat out lie.

But I don't think any of you need me to tell you that, do you?

 

 

Then they try and weasel out a reason as to why they don't allow comments on their blog that are in support of me. 

 

 

I'm Carroll Bryant ... and this is The Looking Glass.

 

 

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

 

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog do all of the lying and spinning

 

* Carroll Bryant didn't tell Jude to kill herself because she broke her promise to him to review his books and interview him

 

* Nobody (outside of the bullies) has even seen this email 

 

 

Missing In Action

This is interesting. John Green took down a couple of posts about me on his blog and offers up a strange explanation.

More dissention in the ranks? Kind of like what happened with GenX and Ann Somerville? One can only speculate I imagine. Cutting ties with Amanda Welling would be a good idea right about now.


Okay, this post was too short so now, let's have some fun. I was recently directed to the Jon and Amanda Welling blog, "Carroll Bryant Lies". To the comment section of the page "His History" and there I found this exchange. (Check out the screenshots)

First of all, sorry "anon" that my posts are too long and boring and go off track sometimes. I'll try and do better. But you are right, I shift gears a lot.

Apparently, somebody wants to see all the evidence of everything I have been accused of doing. Can't say I blame them, I wouldn't mind seeing it myself. Be that as it may, this "anon" got the proverbial treatment of "Blah, blah, blah, STGRB, blah, blah, blah, Carroll Bryant, blah, blah, blah, *Tear* and blah.

What I was drawn to was this statement when Jon (or) Amanda responded:

"In short, Carroll posted a list of bloggers who didn't fulfill their reviewing duties on one of his books. It was later admitted, by Carroll, that he never sent books to these bloggers, but he was mad that they didn't keep their promise. That never made sense to many people. He didn't lose money on anything and book bloggers are not required to review books that are sent to them to begin with. A few of the bloggers he named claimed they didn't have anything to do with him. It escalated from there and turned into a huge mess."

I later admitted that I never sent books to these bloggers? Really? Can we see a screenshot of where I say that? I sure would like to see it because I can't seem to recall saying that. I did send those books to those bloggers after they approached me asking for a free read in exchange for a review and or interview. (It varied from blogger to blogger) And while I was mad they didn't keep their word, I let six plus months go by before posting "The List". And why did I post the list? To get back at Jude Henderson for manipulating my friend and co-blogger in allowing my friend to make Jude an administrator on our shared blog under the guise of "helping with her blog design" just so she (Jude) could leave links to her blogs on the pages of my shared blog. And why would Jude do this? Because she wanted to "rub it in my face" and show me that she can still "get" to me anytime she wanted.

And why would she want to do that? Because I had blocked her from being able to email me a few months prior. This was Jude's way of "getting back" at me. You see, Jude didn't want people to know she and I were still "friends" - she wanted to be "secret" friends. (Don't ask me why, I still don't know. She's crazy that way)

Anyhow, I posted "The List" as a retaliation for what Jude did. I don't mind that she tried to "lash out" at me, I just didn't like her using, manipulating and deceiving my friend in the process. When you use my friends as a way to get even with me, I'm going to come down hard on you. That's what I did.

It may not justify the situation, but I did it for payback - right or wrong - and I own it. I would do it again if I had the chance. But those bloggers who broke their word, they were Jude's friends and when Jude broke her word, they followed her.

Now that we got that straightened out, I still want to see the screenshot where I said I recanted my story and said I never sent those books. So please, show us the proof "Carroll Bryant Lies". (Or should I say Jonathon Welling? Amanda? GenX? Whomever you are. LOL (That last one was sarcasm. Sorry about that.

But seriously, you said it, you made the claim - now produce your evidence.

 

Trust me when I say, you will never see it. Why? Because I never said it. Hey, I thought your blog was to report on my lies, not make your own lies up?

 

Oh, here is something funny. Check this out. They posted a screenshot of their "Traffic" and it has me written all over it.

 

 

 

I hate to break the bad news Welling family, but I have only been to your site about four times the past three days. I think what you have there are "my readers" clicking on your link I left in one of my posts. Hey, you can thank me later for sending you the page views, just glad I could help out. I said I would do that if you wanted.

And look at you, almost 1000 views already. My, aren't we the grown up bloggers?

 

And while we're on the subject of "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog, I was sent this email from a site visitor who took time out of their day to read Jon and Amanda's little blog and then took the liberty to leave a comment which, amazingly enough, was never published. So this person took the extra time out of their day to send me a copy of it via email. I thought since "Carroll Bryant Lies" didn't publish the comment from one of their readers, I would post it here. And here is that comment.

 

Now, let me see if I get this straight "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog; You don't want me commenting because, as you stated, I have a gazillion blogs to say my peace, so why didn't you publish this readers comments? Oh, wait, let me guess, because it defends me? (And you don't call yourself a hate blog?) So, for everyone reading this, the comment policy over at "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog is as follows: "Agree with us. Do not defend Carroll Bryant. Conflicting opinions to what we believe will result in your comment NOT being published!"

 

I'm still waiting to see that screenshot. That proof. Turning blue in the face over here. Can't ... hold ... my ... breath ... much .....

 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is the Looking Glass.

 

 

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

 

* John Green took down a couple of posts about Carroll Bryant under suspicious circumstances

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" said I re-tracked a statement but can't show the proof

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" - actually they do lie

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" is getting a lot of visitors from my "Looking Glass" blog

* "Carroll Bryant Lies" won't publish your comment if the comment is in support of Carroll Bryant

* Carroll posted "The List" just to get back at Jude

* Jude stalked Carroll on his shared blog

* Jude used Carroll's friend to try and get even with Carroll

* Carroll can't hold his breath .... much .... longer .....

Amanda Welling Goes Mental

Well, ever since STGRB and myself uncovered the truth about Amanda Welling really being GenX, boy has she hit the freaking roof. She went on a rant like none other I have ever seen. She starts it off by saying that I can't handle the truth? Really? And what truth would that be, Amanda? The truth about your identity? Oh please, stop being a baby.

She speaks about this STGRB doc-dropping thing again yet provides us with no proof of it. Meanwhile, I have a doc-dropping post coming up in March that Amanda did and I supply the proof.

Then she claims that STGRB and myself are out to "silence" her. No Amanda, we're just out to prove you to be the liar that you are with PROOF! Not just mere words. The same kind of proof I used to show there was (is?) sexual role playing going on, on Goodreads, which you and the rest of your bully clan continue to refuse the evidence for what it is. Sure, it would be nice if you just shut up and went back into obscurity from which you came, but speaking for myself, I don't mind you. Every time you post something on your GenXpose blog, you make yourself look stupid. LIke now, when you say stupid things like this:

"Bryant gives birth to hate blogs like flies lay larvae. In less than two hours, he created, destroyed and recreated several revenge blogs. Only after his backside was suitably kicked by our quick-capturing group and he was publicly shamed for his malicious efforts did Douthit, posing as her alias Athena Parker's alias Johnny Be Good, attempt to shoddily rescue him from soreness by tacking on a little section "proving my identity" in her latest book site attack. The problem is that's not me. Oh, they know it's not me but they're doing it anyway. Why? Because it's an excuse to hurt someone else who happens to be a Goodreads member."

You're correct, they are "revenge" blogs. Revenge being a payback to someone for doing something to me "first". But you never even came close to my backside sweetheart, and I was never "publically-shamed". Not like you're about to me be anyway. Thank you very much for clarifying that revenge thing, Amanda. As well as - thank you for this upcoming confession also, after I left a comment on STGRB talking about Amanda's other blog "Hippies, Beauty, and Books Oh My", Amanda (as genX) responded like this:

"Much to your dismay, we have removed nothing from this blog. Nor will we do so. This blog is evidence and testimony. It gets backed up several times a day and can be moved in its entirety to another host at a moment's notice."

So, you haven't removed "nothing" from that blog, Amanda? Nor will "we" do so? So, what you're saying is, it is your blog (and your husband, Jon) And now you're "Hippie" blog is evidence and testimony? ... Evidence and testimony for what? That proves Amanda and GenX are the same people? I mean, you just said it is your blog and you're writing as "GenX" - remember? But wait, I'm confused (NOT) because earlier in your post you say this:

"Only after his backside was suitably kicked by our quick-capturing group and he was publicly shamed for his malicious efforts did Douthit, posing as her alias Athena Parker's alias Johnny Be Good, attempt to shoddily rescue him from soreness by tacking on a little section "proving my identity" in her latest book site attack. The problem is that's not me. Oh, they know it's not me but they're doing it anyway. Why? Because it's an excuse to hurt someone else who happens to be a Goodreads member."

Hey Amanda, make up your mind. I don't have to say you're GenX, you said it for me. Here are the screenshots to prove it.

So, I ask you GenX (Amanda Welling) Who is the liar now? And yes, my evidence does exist and yes, I refute you. Unfortunately for you, I didn't shut up. I decided to put up instead. Much to your dismay. And there will be more in the future so keep digging that hole honey-buns.

As for paypal fraud in which you claim against (me?) STGRB and Athena - put up or shut up!

 

As for me being Athena, Johnny B. Goode or anybody else on STGRB - put up or shut up!

 

My suggestion to you GenX Welling (LOL) is to quit while you have a little bit of dig ..... you know what? That ship has sailed. Yeah, buh-bye!

Looks like Amanda bought a lifetime supply of shovels. Holy hole to China Batman! How deep does she plan to dig that hole?

Oh, and your last paragraph on your post Amanda: "You remember Jon, don't you? He's the other superfly been kickin' your asses. Try to remember that you are talking about his wife. Irritating him won't get you anywhere you want to be and, believe me, I like him far better than I'll ever like the two of you and I'll be happy to lend assistance. Now push your luck just a little bit more and see where it gets you. I'm not the kid that boxed by Queensbury rules. I'm the kid that takes you down hard on the playground for breaking a crying kid's glasses because you're bullies and deserve it." - But GenX, you are his wife. You just came clean in the evidence I provided up above. By the way,  you misspelled the word "Kissin". You spelled it "kickin".

As for showing you my IP evidence, I'll save that for court. You know, when you and Jon file those charges against me. What are the charges again? For daringly to defend myself against you and your bully attacks of lies? I forget. Was it for revenge? For uncovering the truth about your real identity?

Oh well, I guess it's not important sweetheart. I'm sure you two fruit baskets will come up with something. Hey, you two don't have any children do you? I only ask because I don't want to show up at your Kangaroo Court by way of a court order written in crayon, and see that your son or daughter is the judge. Although, that would be adorable. Kids playing grownup is always adorable. Take you for instance, it's adora ..... okay, maybe you're not such a good example. Anyhow, yeah, good luck with that whole .... you know .... taking me to court thingy-majig and what-not.

As for this final screenshot - honey, you did report my blog and tried to take it down. You failed. Talk about your narcissism.

Amanda, you pat yourself on the back way too much. You hold your own parade. (Always when it's raining though) And trust me, you give yourself way too much credit. It is so easy to distract you bullies and knock you off guard, take for example my three new blogs. You got so worked up over them that you wrote your new post out of emotion and ended up forgetting mid way who you are. I got your brain so twisted that you honestly think I am one of the STGRB staff. Do you know how hilariously funny this is to me? Can't you even see that I am playing you and your wack-job of a husband (who I know started the blog "Carroll Bryant Lies") like puppets? LOL I have you two so strung out and jumping all over the place like Mexican beans in a cigar box.

And now that I know it is your husband who started that blog about me, I am going to start learning how to ignore him too. And as for this statement you made: "Of course he found it on our blog, SLK posted it there and Bryant literally sits on our blog like a broody hen." Do you realize that it only took you about 15 minutes to post something about my three new blogs? Looks like somebody sits on my blog as well. But you also stalk other blogs too and that proof is on the horizon in future posts. In fact, a lot of your obsessing over me and Athena and STGRB is going to be revealed in the process. You are so going to like the month of March Amanda. I wish I could see you through your cam just for the priceless look on her precious chubby face. And oh, why do I say chubby when I should have said fat? Because I saw a full body pic of you and trust me jelly-roll, you are one big woman. (And that is pay back for this remark of calling me "fat boy")

But I say - if clocking in at 230 Lbs. at six feet and three inches tall is considered fat, then I am fat I reckon. But how tall are you again? And how much you carrying? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. I guess when all else fails, name call like an 8 year old.

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass.

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

* A LOT!

 

 

UPDATE: I am going to be deleting those three new blogs. I only started them to figure out who started "Carroll Bryant Lies". Now that I know Amanda's husband started it, I don't need them anymore. I also got more than I bargained for with GenX's confession of "owning" that "Hippie" blog that Amanda owns - Thus - GenX is Amanda Welling.

If you watch the distraction in the left hand - you won't see what the right one is doing.

 

Hey, that could another thing we learned today

GenXpose: Hypocrisy In Action!

So recently, I documented a new blog called "Carroll Bryant Lies" which apparently, as according to the bullies who created it, isn't a "Blogger" ToS violation. Despite the fact that they are libeling me by using my name and informing everyone in the title that I "lie". However, when I created three new blogs of my own using a few of the bullies names, followed by the truth, they start crying "Violation! Violation!" As shown here in these screenshots.

It would further illustrate how these bullies feel entitled to be able to create any blog they want about me and yet, nobody can do the same in return about them. Can you see their hypocrisy?

I have, of my own free will, suspended those blogs (and changed their names to better resemble the blog with my name, but the shock factor did the trick) until I return from my vacation in early April. Nobody will be allowed to see any of the posts until I change the settings. (If I change the settings) But bullies, you are now on alert. If you can do it, then so can I. And I will - reopen those blogs if you insist on playing your childish games and continue to stalk, harass and bully me with the "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog.

Are we understanding each other? I hope so.

 

Trust me, if my blogs violate any ToS by Google, then so does yours and all of us will end up losing all of our blogs in the end. Trust me on this. Or, we will all be allowed to have these blogs and we continue the insanity. Or, you take me to court where I will gladly go with you. It's your choice. You have until April to decide.

 

This madness is going to end one way or another.

 

 

 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass.

 

 

 

Things We Learned Today:

 

 

* The bullies can dish it out, but they can't take it

 

 

 

UPDATE:

 

The Blog "Carroll Bryant Lies" calls my new blogs I created "fuckery" - where as their blog about me is NOT fuckery? Hypocrisy well played Amanda and company. Coming on the heels of exposing the truth about GenX really being Amanda Welling. Do you have anymore lies you wish to share Amanda? I mean, GenX?

Angela Horn

One of the most common whines about the bullies is “We stay in our spaces. We don’t go to other people’s spaces. They come to our spaces and bully us.”

Translation: Blah, blah, blah, STGRB, blah, blah, blah, Carroll Bryant, blah, blah, blah, *Tear* and of course, blah!

(I know I already used that analogy before, shut up.) LOL

Well, allow me to introduce to you a most amazing woman. She is as kind, sweet and intelligent of a woman you’ll ever meet, and just as beautiful an lovely as an early morning Spring. Her name is Sharon Desruisseaux. And yes, she is an author.

Sharon was an un-expecting victim of the bullies. Someone put her books on a “shit-list” book shelve and soon, others followed. It’s a monkey see, monkey do chain reaction that occurs more times than you think. In any normal fashion, Sharon merely inquired to a few of them personally as to why they did that. Not knowing that in the warped minds of these bullies, this is a huge “No-No”! For one doesn’t have the right to question the actions of a monkey. Just slip them a banana and move along to the next cage.

Anyhow, the point is, all Sharon did was ask why? Why a person she doesn’t know, doesn’t know her, perhaps has never even spoken to, would go and place a book she has written in a shelf that designed to “degrade”.  A simple little explanation would have sufficed, everybody moves on. But no, did the bullies do this? Not at all.

One of the people in which Sharon contacted to ask why her book was placed on a “shit-list” book shelf, confused about as she was, was no other than fellow author, and now, infamous bully, Angela Horn.

Keep in mind that at this point, Sharon wasn’t going public with this question, she was addressing these people on a “one-on-one” basis. However, did Angela Horn keep it on a “one-on-one” basis? Absolutely not. Oh no, bullies can’t function one on one, they need to draw attention to themselves and call their army of delinquents in and attack Sharon on her Goodreads blog. Check this out if you think I am lying. Here is a shot of Angela’s blog post on Goodreads.

Talk about un-professionalism. Talk about a “Badly Behaving Author”. Talk about … okay, you get the picture.

Now, at this point, I wanted to show you some screenshots of other authors, and STGRB supporters, who went to Angela Horn’s Goodreads blog and attacked her for publicly being an ass. The only problem with this is …. There was none! Nope, not a one. Zilch. Nada. Zero-amundo and … you get the picture. 

Here is the link. Don’t take my word for it, see for yourself. Angela Horn

Nobody can say that there were any comments from other authors or STGRB supporters and that “Angela deleted them” because let’s face it, if there were any such comments being left, they would have either A) Left them up to prove their point …. Or B) some of her supporters would have captured it with “captions” in responses …. Or C) Left a retaliation comment, that of which you will not find in this case.

Bottom line: Nobody went to Anela horn’s GR blog to attack her. Not Sharon. Not her friends. Not her fans. Not STGRB. Not STGRB supporters. Not Carroll Bryant. (Hey, wait a minute, that’s me) Nope, no one attacked Angela on her GR blog. 

So, as to the claim that authors and their supporters or STGRB and their supporters “never stay in their spaces” doesn’t seem to apply here, does it? Because it sure looks like nobody “invaded” her space at all. 

Are we keeping up? Things are just beginning to cook. 

Now, after this “public” attack by the very un-professional and angry Angela Horn, (sounds like a catchy new nickname, doesn’t it? Feel free to use it. Just make sure that if you do, you give me full credit of course, Mr. Spicoli.) the dear Miss Sharon Desruisseaux promptly took to her author blog on Goodreads and wrote this very telling account of her experience. Please notice that when you look at the screenshot, you will NOT see Sharon mention any names. If you still doubt my word, here is a link to Sharon’s blog post, feel free to call me out on this one. Sharon's GR Blog

Now, if you’re questioning my opening line on this article about what the Goodreads bullies claim about staying in spaces, here is a screenshot of The  Holy Terror making a comment in regards to the “alleged”  bully practice.

I want to focus on the ending to this comment in which “The Holy Terror” says, and I quote: “How exactly does one bully someone else when THEY’RE the ones who come onto OUR personal space and stir up shit?” :End of quote.

They make this too easy.

Now I would like to share with you some screenshots of the bullies from the hate group “Badly Behaving Authors” that can be found on Goodreads and Amazon Kindle Forum Boards. These comments are taken from Sharon’s Goodreads blog. Her own “personal” space. (Keeping in mind that nobody went after Angela on her GR blog)

Those that I circled are the bullies. Just a taste. I see Coaxial got two cents worth in. (About all he is good for, two cents) You’ll be seeing more about Coaxial. Trust me. One of the biggest bullies on Goodreads. If there were ever a sheep in this world, this individual is the biggest of them all. Coaxial wouldn’t know where to go if it weren’t for the footsteps of his friends for which he could follow. Not to take anything away from “In2Books”. She’s a piece of work all unto herself. I like to think of her as a cow-patty sandwich slapped between two pieces of cow-patties. (Okay, you’re right, I’m isolating here, and lying. The truth is, I think of all of them like that.)

But I digress - Do we see anything unusual here? I thought that authors, their supporters and those who support STGRB were the ones who “invade” their “spaces”? But of course, as the evidence shows, this is not the entirely the case, now is it?

The best part about these findings is that you don’t have to take my word for anything. In fact, I insist that you don’t. Just go take a look-see for yourself.

Warning: It doesn’t stop here. Oh no, not by any stretch. There’s still another little thing I wish to bring up since it came up on Sharon’s blogs comments. These bullies not only “Invade” other people’s spaces (while claiming they don’t and that it’s everyone else who invades theirs) but furthermore, even after they go to other people’s spaces and stir up shit, cussing and a fussing - when you curse back (because you know you’re only human and can take so much of these bullies and their horse shit) they turn around and accuse YOU of violating the Goodreads ToS and (yes, there is more) they threaten you with being BANNED! And of course the biggest cry-baby of the bunch threatening this is none other than …. Drum roll please …. “In2Books”! (If’ins that is your real name)

Check these screenshots out if you are still doubting me.

In the second screenshot, we have “Amy or Ames” saying: “I consider Gary’s comments to be offensive and threatening, and following those he offends is harassment which contravenes GR’s terms. If he continues this behavior, he will be banned as others have before him.”

Hey, “Amy or Ames” or whatever the freak you want to be called, here’s an idea, how about you stop harassing other people in their spaces? Yeah, that’s right, you heard me. Sharon’s blog is not your space. There, I said it. (It had to be said) Maybe none of this would have started had all of them just done what they claim they do and stay out of other people’s space. Nobody from STGRB or any other person “invaded” Angela Horn’s space, now did they? But these people not only invade other people’s space, they bully, they attack, they incite trouble and if you respond, they go crying to Patrick Brown.

Hypocrisy, hypocrisy, hypocrisy, and lies, lies, lies.

Do you want to know what this reminds me of? I was visiting a friend of mine not too long ago and his two boys, 6 and 8, were playing with their toys and as young brothers often do, they were arguing over space in the living room. My friend, their father, separated them and gave each of them their own space. The older boy slowly, and methodically, started spreading his toy cars further and further out, reducing the space of his little brother. It didn’t take long for the younger boy to pick up on this. “Hey, you’re not allowed to do that. That’s my space!”

The younger boy pushes the older one. “Get out of my space!”

The younger one pushes back. “Shut up! Stop pushing me!”

The father gets up and takes the older boys toys away and sits him down on the edge of the couch and tells him. “You don’t get any space now. Don‘t be pushing your brother.”

The younger boy cried out. “But he pushed me first!”

“Yeah,” said his father, “but only after you invaded his space. He had a reason to push you."

I sat there and nodded my head. Sensible father.

In the story I just told, the older boy is “The Goodreads bullies from the hate group, Authors Behaving Badly”. Namely, (Coaxial, In2Books and Amy)

The younger boy represents Sharon and her friends. Their space was invaded.

But do you want to know what the worst part of this is? “In2books” and her bully friends may very well get someone banned. Why you may ask? Because most of these Goodreads bullies are “Goodreads Librarians” and they have community manager Patrick Brown in their pocket.

Now, what do you think about that?

Meanwhile, the person who might suffer the most from all of this is Sharon. These bullies go to great lengths, not to just express their “opinions” but rather, they go that extra mile to try and ruin people’s image, character, and reputation. (And their career) This is - after all - their motive operandi. It’s not about expressing themselves as reviewers, it’s about power. It’s about bullying. And it’s about time for the ugly truth to show itself.

Gillian said it best in that last screenshot: “You see! Here they come!”

And of course, this all reminds me also of our newest bully and notorious stalker, GenX of GenXpose. She can’t stay in her space either. She also can’t help stalking people. Most notably, STGRB, myself and now, it would seem, my friends blog. But this is something a lot of us who do know the truth has come to expect. Think I’m lying? Well. Check this out.

We already know she started emailing me first. I covered that in my second article, “GenXpose Part One”. But did you know she also stalked/stalks Athena at STGRB? Yes, it’s true. Not only has GenX emailed me needlessly, but she also corresponded with Athena in similar fashion. (Or at least tried to) But Athena wouldn’t hear of it. Take a gander at this comment Athena left on STGRB telling us all of GenX’s exploits.

Think she’s lying? Well then, explain why GenX would send a follower request to STGRB’s Twitter account?

Kind of creepy, isn’t it? I mean, first she gets denied the right to comment on the STGRB website for her silliness bully behavior, then she pesters Athena about it through email. And if that wasn’t enough, even after Athena ended it and asked her to move on, GenX sent another email under a different email address. It’s like, this GenX girl always has to get the last word or something. These bullies can’t take the word “NO!” or the words, “STAY AWAY!” or even, “LEAVE ME ALONE!”

But this is what we’re up against.

Here she is flipping out on Athena on her blog.

That just gives me the willies every time I read it. As for the stalking part? I was alerted to this. Check out the screenshots. They are from her blog “GenXpose” where she posted screenshots of my friends blog. (Who has nothing at all to do with anything and, has never mentioned word one about GenX and her blog or anything.) And GenX is at least ten years older than my friend. WTF? Isn’t it about time you start acting your age, GenX?

By the way GenX, things don’t go missing after you report them. You’re more full of yourself than a Christmas turkey. I didn’t want her to take down my interviews, it was her idea. She just didn’t like your links and that of the hate group “Authors Behaving Badly” from Goodreads, popping up on her blog and stinking up the place. I can’t say I blame her, who wants to deal with your sewage? However, I reposted my latest interview (the one with the pictures) on my blog. An hour later, I was alerted to your post. Nobody is afraid of you. You’re nobodies hero except for that of your own. (And people say that I am narcissistic?) You and your bully friends need to stop living in the past and get over it.

She stalks at will. Or so the evidence would suggest. Check this out.

(FYI - I don’t have a web cam) Her and her minions just can’t seem to stop talking about me thus, I can’t help but to share it with you all. How about one more just for shits and giggles?

I like how she says: “I have repeatedly told others to be careful what they do and say because they own it. Many have chosen time again ignore that wise advice. So be it.”

Well GenX, it would appear as though we can add you to the list of who ignored you. Here is a screenshot taken of my blog traffic for my Carroll Bryant blog.

How many times does her blog appear on it? Five? You do realize there is only ten lines right? So half of my traffic comes from …. Gulp ….. You?

You’re a stalker GenX - OWN IT! (In my opinion of course)

And you’re just like your good friend Jude. No wonder you two are buddies. You have a lot in common. I bet you two exchange notes on the best ways to stalk me. How sweet. Do you two have Carroll Bryant slumber parties too? You do?! Awesome! That’s just fantastic.

But the good news here is, I don’t care. What I do care about are people like Sharon Desruisseaux, but I’m not going to worry too much, she’s a tough lady and she has a lot of supporters who stepped up to the plate. This next screenshot is an example of that.

To all of those who came to Sharon’s defense, you are angels. Thank you. Go in peace.

As for Angela? Well, here she is showing up on one of my book reviews. Seems she is part of the bully crowd after all. The same bullies who condemned me for my article revealing how children are role-playing in sexually explicit role-plays on Goodreads. *Goodreads: Or Good-pedophilia?*  The same bullies who are a part of this group on Goodreads and Amazon forum Boards called “Badly Behaving Authors”. (Led by head moderator, H.L. Leonard, a Goodreads Librarian.)

So sit tight my Funyons, I have plenty more where this story came from.

I’m Carroll Bryant - and this is The Looking Glass.

Things we learned today. 

* Bullies do not stay in their spaces as they claim

* Bullies will cry to Patrick Brown and get you banned

* It’s not about “negative reviews” as the bullies claim

* The hate group on Goodreads is “Badly Behaving Authors” 

* GenX could very well be a stalker

* GenX stalks STGRB, my blogs and my friends blog

* Angels do exist

* I said Funyons 

Carroll Bryant Lies

Hey everyone! Great news to share. Somebody has honored me with a blog dedicated all to me! Isn't that amazing?! Apparently, I am a force to be reckoned with. How cool is that? On the surface, it appears that GenX, Amanda Welling, John Green and who knows how many more are behind it, but now, instead of going after STGRB, they are STILL coming after me. But seriously, a whole BLOG dedicated to me and my lies? LOL Okay, but you do realize that to be taken seriously, you HAVE to provide actually proof of my lies. You know this, right?

Let's take a look at this blog, shall we?

 

Carroll Bryant Lies appears to be focusing on "my lies". All three of them. LOL Yeah, I know, right? But anyhow, let's take a look at one of these lies that this new blog site wants to focus on. It is the dreaded "Model Pic".

 

First of all, didn't I explain that here? Goodreads Bullies: My Final Defense Post

 

I'm fairly certain I did. You know, a joke that went too far. Apparently, the Goodreads bullies aren't swallowing it. (Maybe because their foot is still in their mouth - hard to swallow a foot whole) Not to mention, I can't help what others put on their blog, can I? Of their own accord? Well, evidently, the Goodreads bullies seems to think so. Hey, GenX and Amanda or whomever you are, I know you want to impress me by giving me credit for special powers, but honestly, I can't make people do my bidding. I wish I could. I have a task in mind that I would make you do, but that aside.

 

They seem to focus on my defense against John Green's attack article on me. (If you'll note, all of my posts are "DEFENSE" posts of "OTHER" people's posts that "ATTACK" me. This leads me to believe that these bullies are sending the message, "If we attack you first, and you try to mount a defense, we will attack you further by creating a blog JUST FOR YOU!")

 

 Anyhow, because I posted that tweet John made about ... um ... "things he likes to eat" ... the bullies now want to talk about me wanting to be a "porn star".

 

Okay, I said that in an interview. Apparently, first of all, the bullies have no sense of humor. They take everything in a literal sense. It is obvious that "they" do not get the joke. Still, they are trying to compare that to something John Green actually said to a female on twitter in an actual correspondence.

 

Do you see how far these pathetic losers will reach?

 

This new blog they created just for me isn't doing anything different than what is already going on. Just spin city all the way. And still no evidence to present. And what they do present, I already talk about so, what's the point? You know?

 

Okay CBL, you busted me! I mentioned in an interview that when I was 14 years old, I thought about becoming a porn star. OMG! You are such great investigative reporters! How did you come across that scoop? LOL Like I said, though it was an attempt of being humorous, even if it were real, what of it? A lot of young men think about doing it. Not to mention, I was "FOUTEEN YEARS OLD" when I said I thought about it. You want to defend your friend for having sex with an adult at age 14 by saying she was a child who didn't know any better? Okay, fine, that could be somewhat of a point, yet then you want to turn around and say that me (at 14) isn't a "child" who doesn't know better? ... Really? You want to show your two-faced hypocrisy that easy?

 

Let's take a look at their "About Page", shall we?

 

They start out by saying ... "We are a group of readers, writers, and book lovers who are tired of self-published author, Carroll Bryant, being able to post whatever he damn well pleases on his many blogs and with his socks."

 

Really? First of all, I have socks? And you can prove this? Because this is the first time I ever been accused of having socks. Wait! I do have socks! I admit it. I have like, 50 pairs of them. Wait! You don't mean those socks, do you? LOL I know what you mean. And again, evidence talks, bullshit walks (like bullies) - And now, about this "posting whatever I want" business - Do you mean like the posts on GenXpose? Or John Green's blog? Or all of the blogs you listed under the "History" page of Carroll Bryant?

 

So what you're saying is, it's okay for ALL of you to post what you want to, with or (the most standard practice) without evidence to support your lies? And opinions? But if I actually post evidence and give MY opinion, you people get tired of it? You see, what you really mean to say is, "We're tired of Carroll Bryant standing up to us and our lies and our posting about him and saying whatever the hell we want to say so we're creating this blog to show everyone that Carroll Bryant is a force to be reckoned with and we have no other counter measures to write about on our own blogs anymore so we created the "anti-Carroll Bryant" blog similar to the anti -STGRB blog in hopes to get him to stop defending himself against us."

 

You see, when you become a force to be dealt with, your enemies start grasping at straws and upping the pot. In this case, they created a whole entire blog dedicated to me and my three lies. LOL

 

They go on to say ... "Since he believes in naming and shaming people who disagree with him and he seems to have no problems with his own hypocrisy, we have no problem pointing out the logical flaws in his arguments."

 

I named people and shamed them who disagree with me? When? Calling me a pedophile isn't disagreeing with me. Calling me a racist isn't disagreeing with me. Writing posts that say I chase after underage girls isn't "disagreeing" with me. First of all, you people need to learn the meaning of disagreement. And the difference between that and "libel".  As for the hypocrisy part, what hypocrisy part? I have no problem at all with my hypocrisy part, only yours. LOL I never posted about your hypocrisy until you posted about me. I didn't make all of you people write articles about me. You did that of your own accord. Take your medicine when you're called out for the liars that you are. It isn't my fault that you lie about me, and decide to post it on your blogs. But seriously, you think this blog about me is going to prove your point? Trust me, it isn't. You still have to support your claims with evidence. You don't do that because lies don't come with screenshots and links. It either is true or it isn't. If it's true, you can prove it. If it isn't, you can't. End of story. So yes, please point out all my "logical flaws" - LMAO. (This should be good)

 

Now, let's just take a look at one of their biggest hypocritical statements on this new blog of theirs, shall we. This is what I mean when I say, "They make it too easy". LOL They say, ... " We believe in our Freedom of Speech, as well as Carroll's own rights. We have the right to share our opinions, as does he."

 

Then, they come right back with this ... "Carroll Bryant will NOT be allowed to post here."

 

I don't have to say anything further about that, do I? Of course not, we'll let the evidence speak for itself. (EVIDENCE!) LOL

 

You see, people of the "Carroll Bryant Lies" blog, that is what we call in the "sane" world as evidence. And it can be seen in the screen shot above.

My second lie is that of my age. Really? You're going to hate me because I dance around that? The only reason I dance around it is because it drives the bullies "crazy". LOL Don't ask me why because I don't know. I just know that it does. Drives them crazy, that is.

And my third lie is my writers name. LOL Yeah, they call that a lie. Like Jude Henderson isn't lying about her real name and she isn't even a writer? As Gump would say, "That's all I have to say about that."

Now let's take a look at "The History" of Carroll Bryant, shall we? Here is a screenshot of it.

 

 

 

First of all, this isn't "my" history, it's the history of all the posts made against me by the bullies and their supporters. It's other people's opinions and or flat-out lies" made against me. It's not my history, it's all of yours. All of you bullies. This is what I mean when I say these people haven't a clue. In none of these articles they list does anyone show any kind of evidence that supports any of their claims except for the fact that most of these articles talk about me posting "The List."

Really? Can't you people come up with anything "original"? You're going to keep beating that dead horse until you're blue in the face? (Or have we passed that already?) What a joke. Nice try guys, but this blog is about as lame as all your other blogs. And that's sad. I would have hoped this blog about me would be so much more. I deserve it! LOL Because - like you say - I'm a  narcissist. Wouldn't this blog just be "feeding" my narcissism? (Just asking)

I also noticed they added in the following post, "Self Control Is Lacking", that I have .. "Problems in sustaining satisfying relationships." - This is inaccurate. I have no problem at all having "satisfying" relationships. They are all somewhat "satisfying" to me. I think they meant to say "Long term" relationships. Which would be more closer to the truth. But the fact remains, I don't want a long term relationship so there-fore, that wouldn't be a problem. Of course, if they are talking about their friend Jude Henderson, you would have to talk to her about that. She is the one who seems to be "looking" for a long term relationship and yet, having a problem with them. At last count, her supposedly "ex" Daniel, cheated on her. Of course, I carry my own doubts about this Dan ever having been a real BF of hers. Jude is psychotic, more or less, so .....

 Their welcome post starts everything off in the proper direction. Instead of posting "lies" that I have said, they post a cat. LMAO A cat!!! Yeah, we'll take you seriously now. You posted a picture of a cat. That is so 13 years old of you. Here are a couple of shots of that post.

 

 

Here are a few interesting things they say that I would like to bring up. First we have this, ... "In a nutshell, this is our way of venting and pushing back at the drama that has surrounded a portion of the book loving community for quite some time. Many of us have been feeling like the Grumpy Cat and it is time for us to change that."

Really? This is your way of venting and pushing back? Pushing back against what? Defending myself against your original posts filled with lies about me in the first place? Then you push back when I actually go out and "defend" myself with "The Looking Glass?" - Really? Well here is a free education for you bullies. To push back, you first must be pushed. I never pushed you. You pushed me. Pushing first means "posting" about me first. I am the one who pushed back with this blog. Long after all of you already had your say - which was unwarranted and unfounded - now I have my say but you bullies, in your warped thinking, believe that by me defending myself against your original lies is me "starting" everything? And so now you're going to "push" back?

If I wouldn't know better, I would think I am actually making them look foolish with their lies about me. Trust me, I take this new blog in my honor as a "BADGE" to wear proudly. I really do. If you people at CBL need anything from me, let me know. I'll be glad to help. LOL

 Now let's take a look at this article called Carroll Bryant Goes After John Green - First of all, I went after him? No, more like he went after me first, then I defended myself and now he and his friends are coming after me again with this blog. Hey John, I can't help it if the truth makes you look stupid. That's not my fault. If you would have just left me alone to begin with then none of this would be happening right now. (Same for GenX and Amanda Welling) I mean, after all, you guys wrote about me first. That is pushing, by the way.

 

But check this out, in this article they say ... "Funny Carroll, you seem to love talking about these "bullies" as well. You see, we really hate the double standard with this guy. If you post about him, that isn't okay, but he seems to think he can say whatever he likes about other people with no consequence."

 

No, I don't think anyone can say anything about anybody and there be no consequence. There must be a consequence. And no, I don't like talking about you bullies. I have to talk about you because you people are "talking" about me first. Your blog posts went up first. Your accusations and lies went up first. I am merely defending myself from them. If you wouldn't have ever posted those things first then I wouldn't have ever created "The Looking Glass". Can't you see this? And how is it a double standard for me to talk about you AFTER you guys talk about me? I don't get it. And FYI, I don't say "whatever" I like, I post mostly your own words through "screenshots" and use your own words against you. if you don't want me to do that (like I am doing now with your new blog about me) then shut up. Whatever I do say about you people (the bullies) is in defense of what you say to begin with. How is it that you bullies do not see this? No wonder they forbid me to comment on their blog with my name. LOL They can't handle logic. Or truth.

 

Here is their common issue with "Carroll". LOL (Me)

 

"He has the bad habit of putting everyone in the same basket. For him, anyone who makes a negative, contradictory statement about him or one of his books, is a bully. And don't you know? All bullies are the exact same. We have seen this from Carroll time and time again. If one person posts or says something about him, he holds every person who ever opened their mouth about him accountable too."

 

No, I don't care if someone makes a negative comment about me or my books. But calling me a pedophile, a rapist (Like Zoe called me) or a racist is not a "negative" comment about me, it is libel. Learn the difference. And this is what I am defending myself against. As for my books, I don't care if anyone likes them or not. But writing a fake review is bullying in my book and I stand by that. Rating a book you never read is bullying in my book and I stand by that. Or writing a "book review" and talking about the author instead is bullying in my book and I stand behind that. And yes, you bullies are the same. You bully. That's why you're the same. And yes, I do hold everyone accountable for what they say, especially if what they say is a lie. I mean, first of all, why even say anything about me if you don't know me? If you say something about someone, then expect that someone to confront you about it. If you can't deal with that, then here is a suggestion .... Stop talking about me!

 

And that coming straight from a narcissist. LOL

 

I know what you're asking right now, "But Carz, is there more?" - The answer is yes, unfortunately, there is more. They then go onto say this ... "Take the young girl, Jude, who had the bloody misfortune of being Carroll's first victim in this whole mess. A year later, he is still talking about her even though she hasn't said a word to him and he continues to drag her name through the mud on his new blog. Hell, he even has her slated on his calendar."

 

Okay, first off, "young girl Jude?" You make seem like a child. (Maybe mentally she is, but I digress) She is a 19 year old "adult". (Can you see their spinning ways?) Then they use the word "bloody" as if to indicate I physically harmed her. (Spin city) Then they say "first" victim. (From what I can tell, she is the ONLY victim they seem to talk about. They way they put it, there are other "victims" out there. But who are they?) Can you see this spin? The answer is of course, there are no "victims" and not even Jude is a victim, much less, a bloody one. LOL (Unless it's that time of month in which case, I retrack everything) LOL

 

Yes, I am still talking about her, but it hasn't been a year later yet. (Spin city) It's only been about eight months. Eight months since she stalked me on my shared blog by befriending my best friend and manipulating her to be an admin on it. (All of this without my knowledge. Jude wanted it to be a secret)   But yes, I am still talking about her because she is the one who started this whole thing against me by posting alleged emails that I supposedly sent to her. (I have proof of that and it is coming up so ....) And hasn't said a word to me? How about this for "Having not said a word to me in a year"

 

Here is a screenshot of an email that I got from a girl calling herself "Angela" but in truth, after isolating her ISP - turns out that her ISP is exactly the same as ... Ahem .... Jude's.

 

Now, Angela and I never spoken before until around August. She was on my friend list when I was on Goodreads and she became friends with me about a month before Jude stalked my blog. Keep in mind that I had blocked Jude from emailing me first. But once all of this broke out, and after I got banned from Goodreads, this Angela girl started emailing me like we were best friends. I played along, even when I knew it was Jude. I wanted to see where she would take it. But right about mid January of this year was the last time I heard from "Angela", after I decided to "call her out". Ever since then, our daily emails went to ZERO!

Nice try Jude.

 

And to further showcase the irresponsibility of the people behind this blog, in their post "Self Control Is Lacking" they mention this about my exposing the sexual role-plays on Goodreads. "Carroll Bryant wasn't the first author who talked about these groups on Goodreads that participated in those kinds of activities and we can't say for sure that Goodreads updated their policy because of him. The timing is suspicious, we will give him that much."

 

The timing is suspicious? Really? Even after Patrick Brown emailed me and asked to see all of my evidence - which you can read here Goodreads: The Aftermath Of Shame - and even with the screenshot of Patrick's email to me, you still want to believe it could have just been the "timing"? And that Goodreads was already going to do something? LOL Really?

 

Do you all see the "stupid bully hate" I am up against here?

 

And then say this ... "Carroll seems to think that he should gain some kind of recognition for bringing these issues into the light, so to speak. Honestly, we didn't see much (if any) concrete evidence that actual children were participating in these sexual role-play groups, ..."

 

Really? You have screenshots of me saying that I am a hero and I should be given all the credit for breaking this story? Well, in case you don't. let me give one for you, "I should be given credit for breaking the story because ..... I broke the effing story!" LOL Then they say that Patrick offered me an "Olive" branch. First of all, no he didn't. Asking me for help to do his job is not an "olive" branch. And speaking of "Olive" branches, I offered this in November/December on my other blog to the bullies - none of you accepted that. Now you're stealing my "olive branches" from me? Really?

An olive branch from Patrick would be if he offered to allow me back on Goodreads (which I would decline) and that he offered to rid GR of you bullies. (Which I would accept) That would be an "olive branch".

 

 

Okay, I am ending this here. I think I made my point about this new blog named after me. And as a narcissist, this makes me feel pretty awesome. LOL As for those "Angela" emails, I have all of these emails stored. We may be taking a look at those in future posts. There are some strange similarities I wish to focus on which involve GenX, Amanda and Jude. (Two people pretending to be three. Four if you count the "Angela" persona) But that is in the future. Anyhow, you should go and check out this new blog called "Carroll Bryant Lies". It's really just John's, GenX's and Amanda's way of "striking back against me for standing up for myself to begin with from their initial attacks" LOL And pointing out all of their lies to begin with.

 

Did you get that?

 

What's wrong Amanda, that lawyer thing not working out for you?

 

 

 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is the Looking Glass.

 

 

 

Things we learned today: 

 

* Carroll is a narcissist

 

* Somebody really has it bad for me to honor me with a blog

 

* Jude and GenX may have a new persona called "Angela"

 

* The bullies think GR's new role-play policy and my breaking the story on it is "suspicious". LOL

 

* Carroll lied about his looks by posting a fake picture of himself as a joke that went too far (Get a rope)

 

* Carroll lies about his age (Get another rope)

 

* Carroll uses a "fake" name to write under (Any rope left?)

 

* A 19 year old Jude constitutes her being a "young girl"

 

* The bullies couldn't stand it that I stood up for myself with this blog against their attacks so they started a new blog dedicated to me to counter my defense.

 

* Can't take a blog serious when they post pictures of cats

 

* The people who started "Carroll Bryant Lies" could be 13 years old (Mentally)

* The bullies don't know what an "olive branch" is

* The bullies can't get enough of Carroll Bryant

 

 

* Seriously though, John Green, GenX, Jude, Amanda Welling, all of you need some serious mental help. You really do. This is no joke, mental illness is a serious issue and I plead with you from the bottom of my heart to seek for and receive that help.

 

Oh, and thanks for the blog. I am honored.