Amanda Welling: Off Her Rocker

We have another Amanda Welling sighting to report. Another "Carroll Admits The Truth" post which, quite frankly, I never admitted. What is this "confession" of mine that Amanda reports on her Bullylikes blog? Well, take a look for yourself.

No, Amanda, I didn't "finally" admit that you and Gen Xavier are two different people. I still contend that you are Gen Xavier. I merely stated the facts as I knew them at that particular time. That I was stalked by a Gen Xavier AND stalked by you and your husband at the same time. Back then, those were the facts of the situation. Of course, we discovered other facts later, didn't we? (Like you and Gen being the same person.) The link to you two are about as coincidental, circumstantial and eerie as the link between Athena Parker and Melissa Douthit.

I do like what you added at the bottom though. "Apparently, I still stalked and harassed him for six months." - Well, this is not "apparently", it is TRUE! And the facts support it. Let's take a look at those facts again, shall we? (Just click on the FACTS to read the posts.)

Fact One - You and your husband commented on MY blog first back in July of 2012. You also wrote an article about me on YOUR blog back then. Remember? You and your husband Jon also sent me unwanted emails too. All of this SIX months before I started "The Glass". You and your husband also left comments on Gen's hate blog attacking me before I ever started this blog.

Fact Two - It was in this post where I showed you why I was led to believe that you and Gen were the same people.  

Fact Three - This shows you being a drama queen and you just can't get enough of me. When you first joined "Bullylikes", all you ever seemed to talk about was ME!

Fact Four - This post shows you to be a liar. It's the defense post of mine showing how you claimed I threatened your life, and of course, that was a bold face lie, now wasn't it?

Fact Five - This post shows a screenshot on your "now deleted" hippy blog where one of your "friends" / "readers" wishes me dead. Oh no, nothing wrong with that, is there? (sarcasm)

Fact Six - In this post, you continue to deny stalking me and harassing me (as you still maintain) despite all the FACTS showing otherwise. I wasn't the one who reached out to you, you were the one who reached out to me. You and your husband.

Fact Seven - More evidence that when I didn't even know you, you were head first in supporting Jude Henderson and her friends in attacks against me.

I could go on and on for days, Amanda, but why bother? All the proof anyone needs to see in regards to you stalking me for six months is right here on "The Glass". All one has to do is type in your name in my blog search and presto! All the facts one ever needs to learn about you and your husband and the torment you two caused me for not just the six months prior to this blog getting started, but also, beyond.

So you can keep claiming that you are the innocent victim here all you want while never providing proof that I started in on you first, it just won't fly in reality. Because in reality, you and your husband stalked me and harassed me for months on end for no "apparent" reason. This isn't speculation on my part, it's what the evidence shows.

But starting wars with people is nothing new to you, is it? Let me ask you this, Amanda, what has Anne Rice ever do to you? When has she ever mentioned YOUR name? The answer is of course is nothing and never, yet you have taken to your "Bullylikes" blog to rip her a new one, haven't you? But alas, it's not just her you rip on, it's also her "fans" you rip on to, calling them all "SHEEP"!

I suppose in your infinite wisdom, anyone who likes Ms. Rice and is a fan of her work, they are all nothing but sheep? How non-judgmental of you. I guess where Ms. Rice is concerned, you have a whole lot to say, don't you? I suppose this is of her own doing, I mean, the nerve of her standing up for a cause she believes in. A cause, mind you, that has absolutely nothing to do with you, by the way. But that doesn't prohibit you from weighing in against her, does it?

Well, well, well, look who is making it "personal" with Anne Rice. Why, it's "Little Miss Innocent" Amanda Welling, screaming at the top of her lungs begging for attention. Attention received.

But you're a kind soul, aren't you Amanda? So let's just see how kind you are, shall we?

You like to use the word "fuck" an awful lot, don't you Amanda? And for no apparent reason too. Hell, not only are you such a kind person, you're also very brave - refusing to allow Anne Rice from scaring you, intimidating you, or make you run away from her in fear. Funny how I have never seen or heard of Anne Rice attacking you on a personal basis. It seems to me that you have made this war up in your head also. Everyone is attacking poor Amanda Welling. Let's throw her a pity party. 

Strangely enough, I have never heard Ms. Rice complain about a negative review. All I hear her talking about is bullying that is going on through book reviews. You know, book reviews that are talking about authors in a personal manner when in fact they are supposed to be talking about books?

  And look at all of these links you provide about Anne Rice and her cause.

How many links has she stalked you with regarding you, Amanda? That's what I thought. What's wrong? Getting the feeling that she is shutting you out of your well deserved fame by not responding to you? *Pity party*

Here you are claiming that you are not going to make your fight with Anne Rice "personal".

But you did make it personal, didn't you Amanda? (Trying to anyway.) And to think, you're the only one who is making it personal because to date, Anne Rice has never mentioned your pathetic name, has she? It reminds me of another time in the past when you didn't want to make something personal with someone when you went after them despite the fact that for six months, that person never addressed your existence either, did they? Now, who could that someone be? Oh yeah, it was ME! 

Of course, when I finally responded to you, all of a sudden, you were being attacked by me. You were the poor little victim. I guess Anne Rice should be careful to ever address your insanity because if she ever does, which I know for a fact she won't, you will all of a sudden start claiming her to be stalking you too? It must be nice to live in your psychotic and delusional world of self entitlement. 

And here you are still being nice and everything, calling Anne Rice, someone whom you have never met in real life or has responded to you or said anything bad about you in her life, a "bitter woman" and then-some. 

And of course, in that previous screenshot, I see you mention her "adoring" fans again, all "kissing" her ass. That's mighty "nice" of you, Amanda. But again, you are still stuck on this "negative review" topic that nobody else is talking about. (Except for the bullies.) Because this isn't about negative reviews, it's about bullying. It's about personal attacks on authors. You know, Amanda, like the attack you have waged against Anne Rice for her standing up against cyber bullying. You know, the attack "you" didn't want to make personal but ....... 

And here you are talking about the right for bullies to use fake names in reviews, and authors using "pen" names as your argument. 

It's bullshit, isn't it, Amanda? Your personal stance against Anne Rice and the notion that reviewers should use their real names instead of a fake name is baseless. Let me explain why. (Not that you or bully nation will understand this.) But your claim is that if reviewers use their real names, they automatically give up their "privacy"? Really? Oh yeah, because if Pete Davis uses his real name, then someone could just type in "Pete Davis" and find his personal information? Let me try that and let's see what we get, shall we? 

Holy crap! There are 100 listings for a Pete Davis. Now, which one of them is the Pete Davis on Amazon who left me a bad book review? 

See what I mean?

So you see, Amanda, your whole argument is baseless. It would take a total nut job to actually dig anything deeper than that to find some specific info on a particular Pete Davis. You know, the same kind of nut job that would spend endless hours searching for an author's "real" identity like .... like .... like you, Gen Xavier and Athena Parker searching for the real personal information on author Carroll Bryant?

I think I'm making a pretty good point here. 

Nobody cares about a negative review on a book. This is not the issue. It's personal attacks against authors in book reviews that are under fire. Using a book review as a stage to attack someone on a personal basis is wrong. And if you don't practice this behavior, Amanda, then nobody is attacking you for doing it. So why are you so fired up? Or is it that you just support using book reviews as a platform to attack authors on a personal basis? 

Also, an author using a "pen" name is not the same as a non-author (or reviewer) using a "fake" name. They are totally two different things altogether. Apples and oranges. 

Amanda also continues to say this in one her posts about Anne Rice. 

I see how you alluded to "Anne Rice must want 45 million people to divulge their personal information." - First of all, using your real name online isn't "divulging" personal information. And secondly, just because Anne Rice believes that people who use their real name online in regards to book reviews would decrease the amount of bullying doesn't mean she is in favor of 45 million people divulging their personal information. This is just you "spinning" words and meanings. Not to mention, defamatory against Anne Rice. But you know, you're nice and everything. 

You are right about one thing Amanda, their are plenty of trolls online. All you need to do to find one is look in a mirror. In this next shot Amanda makes the comparison to Pen names and fake reviewer names. 

I would like to note that a five star review or a one star review of a book is neither bullying, or what this issue is all about. Not one author cares about legitimate ratings / reviews good or bad. Especially me. What the issue is all about is fake ratings / reviews and or ratings / reviews that are meant to attack authors on a personal level. It is also important to note that by being required to use your real identity for reviews on Amazon, it would cut out both, sock puppets from both sides, from being able to go in and either jack up the ratings or lower the ratings of a particular book. This would be a great thing!

This next Anne Rice fetish post by Amanda Welling I saved for last for a reason. It's where Ms. Rice talks about how honest reviews from family and friends should not be banned from Amazon. (Which they currently are.)

Apparently, Amanda Welling has a problem with legitimate reviews from friends and family of an author but doesn't have a problem with strangers posting fake ratings or reviews. How wrong is that? So then I should play the Amanda Welling game and put words into her mouth like she does everyone else. Okay, I'll play along: I guess this means that Amanda Welling supports cyber bullying, lying, and personal attacks against authors! 

Not that she wants to get personal about anything, but ...... 

Amanda Welling, please get back on your rocker.

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass. 

STGRB: John Farrow

Remember my post The Athena Parker Lies? Well, there's a story behind that post and it's about time you all know how it came about. One email at a time.

So one day, from out of the blue, I get this email from a guy named John Farrow. He sent me the screenshots that I used in that post mentioned above. Take a look.

He said that he used to be a member of Athena's Anti-troll Alliance group on Facebook. None the less, the screenshots he sent me pertained to the conversation Athena and Mike Dismuke had discussing me. I also posted those screenshots in the post. I also posted John's message to me, but I left out his name, and never did show his email address. I also left out where he misspelled my name. I only showed the message.

Now, why did I show the message? For three primary reasons, first of which, to prove I got the message, otherwise, I felt Athena would try and say that I never got a message and would have ended up accusing me of having a sock in her Facebook group. She's been known to accuse me of things I never done in the past - which I will also prove here in this post shortly, to serve as an example - so why wouldn't it be only fitting to assume she would travel that road once more?

Secondly, John had already admitted that he "left" the group. Plenty of people have left Athena's Facebook group(s) because of her questionable tactics against me, and Rick Carufel, one most notable tactic to mention was her sending a private email I sent her to other parties behind my back, as reported, and shown, by Rick Carufel in his post Is STGRB Breaking The Law?. This will come into play as Athena claims that she doesn't condone behavior such as that yet she practices the very same type of behavior. And apparently, so does her other personality, Melissa Douthit. This next screenshot shows the real personality of one Athena Parker as she refers to Rick Carufel as a "coke monkey". (Yeah, nothing personal about that attack, is there? Not to mention, completely uncalled for.) So would there be any reason for Athena to not accuse me of having sock puppets had I not posted that message from John in my post? Is there any reason for me not to think she would stoop to bully tactics against me? The answer to both of those questions is a resounding NO.

And third, I was smelling a set up. But before I go off the handle and and actually say that it was a set up, I'll let you decide by the emails as they play themselves out.

Now, as soon as I got the initial email from John, I replied with this. 

This was me "asking" for permission to post his message. However, after I had a moment to think about it, I realized, I could post his message without showing his identity because anyone who used to be a member of that group could have sent it to me, right? And we already know by Rick's report that plenty of people have left her Facebook group in recent weeks.  

So, I decided that since I wasn't posting his identity, or his email address, and only posting the message itself, I felt there was no "trust" violation occurring. Nobody would know who sent it to me. There is absolutely no way for anyone to know it was him specifically, and this would prohibit Athena from trying to claim I had a sock puppet in her group. Anyhow, this is John responding to my request. 

At this point, I am trying to figure out how "they" would know who he is. Didn't he already mention that he left the group? And that he took the screenshots of this conversation before he left the group? So not only was I wondering how "they" would know who he is, but why would he pretty much care? I mean, he left the group! And since there was no mention of his name in the post I did, all "they" could do is speculate on who took the screenshots. After all, no "date" was ever shown of when that conversation between Athena and Mike took place. Was it a recent conversation? Was it a conversation they had weeks or months ago? So pretty much, anyone who left that group could be a suspect. But again, I ask the question, if John left the group, then why did he care if "they" would know it was him? And why would he fear "them" knowing? Was he afraid of retribution from Athena Parker? And if so, wouldn't that just prove that people fear Athena and her bully tactics? 

Then John sent me this.

Oh yes, John, I did ask, I just didn't wait for your response because I concluded I didn't really need your permission to post screenshots of Athena Parker and M.T. Dismuke talking about me. But John wasn't finished. He had more to say. 

She was right about me? Okay, whatever you say John. Then I finally respond.

As you can see in my response, I now admit to my suspicion of this being some kind of a set up. Then I go on to explain to him:

Do you see how I choose my words now? I now mention that I don't need his permission to post the screenshots of two people (Athena and Mike) talking about me. (Which I don't.) Now read his response very carefully. I was expecting him to say something like, "I don't care about the screenshots, I just care about the message I sent you." - However, that's not what he said at all. Take a look. 

Yes, he says: "I sent you those screenshots because I thought you had a right to know what your friends are saying about you, not so you can publish them for the whole world to see."

Let me see if I get this straight John, it's okay for the people of her group to see this conversation but it's not okay for me to show the world what other people are saying about me? Really? Well, it doesn't work that way in the real world, John. I have every right to post to the world what others are saying behind my back. I'm pretty sure the world would agree with me on that one. And seeing how I never published your name in the post, or your email address, nor was your name even mentioned in the conversation between Mike and Athena, and since you already (allegedly) left the group, I'm still not seeing how anyone could ever come to the conclusion that it was you who sent that message to me. Unless of course, this was a set up perpetrated by Athena Parker to try and get the "goods" on me to prove I don't get people's permission to post stories about them. There's just one flaw in this scheme, I didn't post a story about someone else, I posted a story about myself. I posted a story about two people talking about me. Nobody else was ever mentioned by name except those who did the talking and me. Oh, and Rick Carufel, because they mentioned him too, but you see, even after all of this, you John were still never mentioned. So I ask yet again, how is it that "they" would know it was you? And why would you even care if "they" suspected you when you have already left the group?  (Allegedly)

Me paranoid? I think not. 

Then John sent me this. 

THERE IT IS!

"Now Athena has all the proof she needs to back up what she's been saying about you." John tells me. Except for what I already mentioned earlier, because what Athena has been saying about me is that I post stories about OTHER people without their permission, but again, the post that I posted wasn't about OTHER people John, was it? No, it was about ME! 

I guess it was a set up all along, for Athena to prove her case about me because she had nothing else to show everyone that I practice the art of posting stories about OTHER people without their permission. I mean, ever since she started making that false claim, she has only focused on ONE post, and that was the Mr. Lucy Flood post. However, no one else has ever come forward to complain that I posted stories about them without their permission, nor can she specifically point to any certain post I ever wrote in the past to use as her example to support her claim. However, now she has this example of me posting a story about MYSELF to prove her claim that I post stories about "other" people without "their" permission. Well here is a news flash for you John, I gave myself permission to post a story about ME! (Or in this case, two people talking about me.)

Then John sends me this. He is now letting me know that he is sending MY emails to ATHENA so she can prove (once and for all) that I'm a liar and betrays people's "trust". 

Yes John, I betrayed my own trust by posting a story about ME. Except as I mentioned earlier, I did give myself permission to post a story about ME. No trust has been violated, except your trust. After all, you sent my emails to Athena just as you two conspired to do. The suggestive evidence is too overwhelming. 

And still, up until this post, your name or email address was never revealed. Nobody knew who sent me that message except those who were involved in the "set up". 

And now on STGRB, we see John has kept his word in forwarding my emails to Athena. In her defamation of accusing me of posting stories about other people without their permission, she links to this email of mine. (Only one email, not the entire conversation.)

The email itself doesn't prove anything. It's just John rambling on, and me requesting that he not ever email me again. It doesn't show me posting a story about someone without their permission. And again, the story I posted wasn't about you, John, it was about me. And of course, Athena also links to my post about her and Mike talking about me. 

She also links to this screenshot below to prove my name isn't Carroll Bryant. (She highlights the part she wants everyone to read.) But if you continue reading, you see directly after what she highlights, I say, "It started out as my pen name. There is nothing unusual about that. However, my name now IS Carroll Bryant." (The key word here is NOW. Because my name is whatever I want it to be. But I like how Athena is just as focused on my name as Gen Xavier is.)

I'll tell you what else she links to in her little sidebar box declaration that STGRB is not associated with Carroll Bryant. A link that is supposed to show everyone how I threatened members on Goodreads and STGRB (as Athena Parker claims.) The link goes to a page that says, "Oops! Page Not Found". 

Yes, her "evidence" to prove that I threaten people is a blank page. Just like all of her evidence regarding her claims against me are all blank pages. Just like her head is a blank page.

Oops! Indeed!

So you see John, I didn't betray your trust by writing a story about you without your permission because I didn't write a story about you. (Until now.) The story you are bitching about is a story about Athena Parker and Mike Dismuke talking about ME. 

I also never revealed your name in that post. Nor did I reveal your email address. So I ask you for one more time, how would anyone have known that it was you who sent me that email? And why would you be so concerned about being a suspect if you already left the group? 

Allow me to answer for you, John.

The reason everyone would know is because you and Athena (and perhaps Mike) put this whole thing together. And the truth is, you never left the group, did you John? 

But here's a little something for you, now you can send her a link to this post as her new evidence that I don't get people's permission to post stories about them because I never asked for your permission to do this post. Then again, I don't need permission from bullies to do stories about them. 

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass.

UPDATE:

This is not a cheap shot at Mike Dismuke, but in one of the screenshots in this post, John asks me why I didn't discuss the screenshots that he (John) sent me (of Mike and Athena talking about me) with Mike in private. Well, here is why John: Because Mike didn't come to me in private to discuss any problems he had with me. Instead, he posted his concerns in a Facebook group for all to see and talked openly with Athena about those concerns. Why would I show him any respect if he isn't going to show me the same courtesy? Had Mike just came to me instead of having a conversation with Athena where others can read it, then I would have kept it private and between Mike and I and then he wouldn't have been compelled to talk openly about it with Athena where others can read it, and this whole thing right here (this post and the other post in question) would never have happened, now would it? Because there wouldn't have been any screenshots for you to "capture" and send to me, thus which opened this whole can of worms in the first place.

Then again, this whole thing didn't happen by accident, did it? 

UPDATE TWO:

I believe that Mike Dismuke holds the power to once and for all, set the record straight as it pertains to STGRB / Athena Parker. Mike knows the truth about whether or not this was a set-up. But I doubt Mike would ever admit the truth. Once upon a time, I thought Mike to be of high honor. After these screenshots were sent to me by John, that thought evaporated. It's just so outside of his character to willfully engage in public scuttle-butt like that. But I also know that Mike is passionate about stopping the bullies. I also know that he feels strongly in that STGRB and Athena were instrumental in the progress that has been made to combat the bullies. However, STGRB no longer is concerned about the bullies. They have been more focused on attacking me, Rick and other authors. Or make lame ass posts like their recent "Shelby" 4 part series posts. Or go after anyone who doesn't support them. What Mike doesn't realize is that Athena Parker and STGRB are now hurting the fight against the bullies. And while I wish he would do the right thing and come onto this blog and confess the truth, that this was a set up organized by Athena Parker, I have a strong feeling that he won't. He won't because he knows it would be the end of STGRB and Athena Parker. And to Mike, if this were to happen, he may feel that the bullies would once again break free all over Goodreads and pick up right where they left off. 

Mike, this is my plea to you. Man to man. Come on here and admit the truth. This whole thing can end right now. And you know it. Do the right thing. STGRB will only do more harm for a cause you once were so passionate about. Just do what you know in your heart is right. Stop playing politics with people's lives. 

Hey Ya'll, Chill Out: It's All Good

So I have had several people emailing me, freaking out over the fact that I have seemingly been pulled back into the Gen Wars. But I just wanted to say that there is nothing to worry about. I have not flipped my wig or anything. The truth is, most of what I have been writing in response to Gen crying over my pen name versus my real name and all of that, I have been doing it with smiles and laughter. It's hard to keep a straight face when I am responding to her idiocy. Well, except for the part where my friend lost her daughter, that was and remains very distasteful of Gen to even bring up. But here's the thing, I know this. I know she's flipped her freaking proverbial wig. I mean, writing an entire post built around my name? The Gen Krunk has gone ape shit batty.

Just don't think that I am unaware of the magnitude of the silliness that is Gen Xavier. And while yes, at first and for the better part of 2013 I took her somewhat seriously, at this point I understand she is a joke. We all know this by now and her latest moan and groan over my name is perhaps the lowest Gen may have ever sunk in her efforts to try and be heard or to try and be someone of significance or relevance. These past days of recent, I've just been toying with her. So to those who have emailed me with concern, I love ya's. But honestly, I am fine.

There is not going to be any lawsuit filed or anything. Do you even know how much that would cost? Just to get the ball rolling would run about 10K dollars. And that's just start up! Seriously, you think I or Gen are going to kick out that much cash to sue the other? Ha ha. Although, it would only cost me 2,500 dollars for a cyber investigator to find out Gen's true identity. I told the guy if he could throw in Athena Parker and her real identity I would have sent him a check yesterday. I think he is thinking it over. But 2,500 bucks is still a lot of money to find out Gen's true identity. She's not even worth a nickel, right?

So you see my friends, I have not gone off the map here where my senses are concerned. I'm just humoring myself with Gen, that's all. But I do appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. And the truth is I am a little bored with Gen and her comical exploits of, "Carroll is a pen name" or "his age and family don't show up in web searches" and silly crap like that. Not that I'm not concerned a little about the fact that she seems to be trying to find out who my relatives are, yeah, that's worrisome. There's no telling what she might try to do to one of my family members if she ever does get that information. The woman is unstable. But as far as me taking her seriously right now over my pen name and old stuff that no longer matters anymore and all of her self entitled demands, trust me, I've just been goofing with the goof. It's kind of like when I playfully annoy one of the kids in my family or something. You know, when they might say, "Uncle Bubby, your hair is getting too long you're looking like a girl." And I say, "Oh yeah? Well, you're fat, your farts stink, and you got a pimple on your nose." You know, something like that. I'm just funning around with them like I am right now with Gen.

So worry no more. I am in control of my faculties. And the truth of the matter is, I've just been poking a little fun at Gen's expense over her "Pen Name" butthurt whines. LOL I mean seriously, making a stink over my name? ..... Get out of here! It's the most comical thing I ever heard. 

Genxpose: Still A Zebra (Updated)

Still keeping true to form, GenX continues stalking me and spitting out the same old blah, blah, blah. Check it out.

So I guess in return I have to keep counter-stalking her. Not that I am really, but my inbox gets a visit from a reader or two (or three) sending me a link of yet another moan and groan from the queen of the bullies herself.

She keeps on claiming she has all of these screenshots that prove something or another on her blog but just like her previous whine about me, she had 9 or so screenshots that I showed on my previous post about her that didn't show a single thing that I did wrong to anyone. And she still does not have a single screenshot of me bullying people, harassing people, stalking people, talking inappropriately with anyone - let alone with minors - threatening anyone, nothing. All she presents are screenshots of me talking about my name, or whatever. All she talks about is "that model pic" *yawn* or "his pen name. *yawn* Or, "he probably doesn't have a mother" *yawn*

Get the picture?

What you fail to own Gen is the fact that this whole thing between you and I started back when you emailed me for no apparent reason. Then you emailed Athena. Then Athena blocked you from STGRB. Then she blocked you from emailing her because you wouldn't stop emailing her per her request. Then you got pissed and emailed her again with a different email. Athena blocked you again. Then you started your hate blog, attacked STGRB and Athena, and in your comments section, you and your bully friends started talking about me. Which brings us to this next screenshot. Take a look.

GenX seems to think that I incite others or cause them concern (even for her own safety?) Are you kidding me? And how many death threats from her friends have I posted on this blog (or death wishes?) 

I have posted plenty!

Then she finishes with asking me why I don't answer some of the direct questions that are put to me? Then wraps it up with, "Or perhaps that is too much to ask as the answers would not support your agenda?" 

The only agenda I have Gen is to address your senseless attacks against me and to try and hopefully put an end to your bullying and your bully friends bullying of myself and others. That's it!

As for those direct questions you want me to answer, didn't I try that once before? I do believe I did because after you opened your hate blog and began posting attacks against STGRB, like I mentioned earlier, you and your bully friends began attacking me in the comments section. I came to your blog to address those direct questions and give you answers but in return, I got attacked even more. I was called a pedophile, a liar, you name it. You and your friends would not allow me to answer any of your questions and then afterwards, you mocked me with a post for trying to answer those questions. 

I'll answer any and all questions anyone has to ask me. The thing is, Gen, you and your army of idiots never listen to the answers. Instead, you post defamatory posts about me approving profit for hate just because I didn't have a problem with STGRB's paypal donation box. Now, for the most part, I can easily deal with the most stupid, but your kind of stupid just can't be dealt with sometimes. That's because your stupidity stems from your the hate you have in your blood and soul for me and probably for life itself. 

Just remember Gen, you contacted me first, and I have already proven that. You talked about me first on your blog, and accused me of things you have yet to back up. You have made such stupid claims like, "He met Jude when she was 15." and so forth. And the only reason I started this blog was to address all the bullshit lies you and your idiot bully friends spoke because you all just wouldn't shut your stupid pie holes about me. You wouldn't stop lying about me, and wouldn't leave me the hell alone. (Even I after I announced on my other blog in November / December of 2012 that I was no longer going to respond to the bullies.) The fact is, you people wouldn't let me walk away from it. 

And your bullying also extended to trying to sabotage my other activities that had absolutely nothing to do with you, like for example, trying to find out who I was planning to interview on my other blog in so that you could email those people to recommend that they don't give those interviews to me and giving them reasons that were nothing but lies. 

Your brand of hate and evil has no shame.

I can't answer your questions Gen. I can't answer them because you never listen to the answers. You are too self centered to own up to your actions and lies. (Just like Athena Parker) You're a bully. You run a hate blog. I can't answer your questions because all you do is mock those answers and mock me when I try. Because I tried to answer your questions once before. And you mocked them and you mocked me. But yeah, I will answer any serious and direct question anybody has, provided those questions are asked by a serious individual who honestly seeks the answers. You, Gen, are not a serious individual who honestly seeks the answers. You're a serious bully who playfully wants to mock and hurt others. That's it. That's all you are. That's all you have shown yourself to be. Why on earth would I think you have changed? You've done nothing at all to indicate to me that you have changed. And I seriously doubt you ever will. A zebra is a zebra no matter how much they profusely declare themselves a horse. I know this because; even in your recent post to me, to bullishly put into the minds of your few readers that I have an agenda; to indicate that I am selfishly trying to accomplish something just for my own gain and purposes tells me you are still the same old you. 

I am not Athena. My concerns are for others, not just for myself. I stood up to you and the rest of your bully pals in the hopes that I could keep you all occupied with me in so that you might not target and attack other authors. That and to defend myself from all of your many lies. 

You started all of this, Gen. YOU! I didn't know of your existence, nor cared about it, until you reached out to me. And see, you still won't own it. You haven't changed a bit. You're still a zebra. And until you admit the truth - and own up to your initial actions - there is no question I can answer for you that you will bother to listen to. (Or spin for your few readers.) 

When you cease to being a self righteous know it all bitch, I will start taking you and your questions seriously again. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. (There will be no shame on me.) So just burn in hell with those questions until you acknowledge that when it comes to Carroll Bryant, you don't know Jack Shit.  

I'm Carroll Bryant .... and this is The Looking Glass.

Update: 04/19

The anonymous troll known as Gen Xavier is still crying over my name. GenX - like every bully - feels she is entitled to seeing proof of my name, saying that I need to show legal documentation. 

 Newsflash: I haven't seen her show a legal document proving her real identity either. Or are we to believe that an envelope from Domino's Pizza is a legal document? You know, because they deliver. 

The only time I visit your blog Gen is when I see a link on my blog traffic from your hate blog.

She claims I tried to extort her and then she links to this as her proof.

 I have never used "hushmail" in my life. There's no evidence on that screenshot showing that I sent it. This is what I mean when I say that she never shows evidence. Whenever you want to file charges against me for this email Gen, knock yourself out. I know law enforcement can still trace that email back and I have as much money as you want to bet that it won't link back to me or to anyone that I know. I have a funny feeling that you created the hushmail account, and sent that email to yourself with all those LOL's to try and make it look like it was sent from me. Just because you "think" I did it doesn't mean that I did. Then again, you're so self entitled, self centered with an ego the size of Texas that you naturally assume you're right about everything. (Still waiting for the badges to show up.)

Facts: I know you dislike them, Gen, which is why you never use them.

Here is what you left out Gen. (Funny how you tend to do that.)

Facts: Why use them when half truth's work just fine, right Gen?

You mean the screenshots of facts you post like the hushmail email? You know the one, the one I just posted in this update? The one that DOESN'T show my email address? Or my name? Is that the evidence of "facts" you're describing that YOU provide? And by the way, you got it all wrong, Gen, I want everyone to look at your "facts" because all of your "facts" are just like the hushmail email you posted. You know the one, the one I just posted in this update. The one that fails to show my email address and name. The one you "think" I sent because we're all to believe that what "you" think is proof? And as for your amazing "math" skills, let's take a quick peek at them, okay?

So, Jude was "15" when I met her? Are you sure you didn't mean "17"? Because when she joined Goodreads she was "17" back in October 2010. (Her birthday is in August.) In April of 2011, I joined GR. Jude was still "17". When I first met her in mid June of 2011, she was still "17" - a couple months shy of her "18th" birthday. I guess in your mentally ill world, 2 months shy of her "18th" birthday is considered - and I quote your own words - "well under the age of consent" - unquote.

How is that "telling the truth" again? How is that "not spinning" again? And oh, by the way, if you need more evidence of this, then take a look for yourself at her Goodreads profile. 

You see Gen, if you were any good at "math", then you would be able to use that skill to figure out that if you take August 29th, 1993, and count the years to August 29th, 2010 (when she joined Goodreads as per her profile states) then you would come to the answer that she was 17 when she joined GR in October of 2010. (Two months after her 17th birthday.) Then if you add another year to it in 2011, you would get 18. Then when you factor in my joining GR 8 months after she did, you would see she was still 17. When you factor in that I didn't meet her until mid June, the "math" shows she was still 17. 

But since you like to "porno" everything up, and before you go foaming off at the mouth that our friendship was somehow sexual, then I assume you will have screenshots (or emails / messages) between her and I showing this to be a fact, correct? Or once again, are we just to take your word for it that you "think" there was something perverted going on - and like with your hushmail email - if you "think" it, then it must be true? 

I'm an author. I wrote a YA book. (Or two) I am going to have readers / fans who are going to be under 18 years old. When they reach out to me (like Jude did) I'm going to be nice and polite towards them, and be friendly. It's how you sell books. Plus it's just common decency. And before you go off the rails (again!) about the "model" pic, Jude knew about it within four weeks of us meeting. (That's a month, in case you can't do the math.) And about five weeks before her 18th birthday. 

Now, either it's true and you seriously don't have very good "math" skills, or you're saying that she was "15" when she and I met just to be spreading hate lies about me on purpose. (Which would then prove that I am right that you are a bully, spread lies about me intentionally, and are hateful.) So which is it, Gen? Do you just suck at math, or are you a hateful lying bully and purposely made that statement with no regards to the actual truth? It has to be one or the other, correct? 

You all can read about it right here. 

I think I just did, Gen. Got it?

So, you don't even remember what you say now? Allow me to remind you then. 

 If you read what I blocked in at the bottom you see it says: "I'm sure that's just a coincidence, even though some people who develop alternate personas often "borrow" the identities of elderly and/or dead people to do it." - Your words Gen, your words. You are insinuating that I "borrowed" this mans identity. How is that not "spinning" words again? 

Facts: Not easily identifiable by Gen Xavier. 

I did not devote an entire post talking about my name. I devoted an entire post talking about YOU and ATHENA being so fixated about my name. (Big difference) Allow me to show you the PROOF below, starting with you first. 

And now Athena's fixation. 

So you see, Gen, my name is not a big deal to me, but from the evidence presented above showing YOU writing a post referencing my "name" and Athena making it a point to "mention" my "name", it would appear that you two are indeed the ones who are consumed with my name. Not to mention, all of your self entitlement in believing that I owe you (or anyone for that matter) any proof to what my name is. I don't owe you shit. You're not entitled to shit. So, get over yourself. And even in the screenshot that you boxed in to "try" and make your point, I say; "Then THEY (meaning you and Athena) conclude their bullying of me by saying that Carroll Bryant is a pen name." - So again, I refer you to the FACTS, that i am not talking about my name, but rather, talking about YOU and ATHENA "talking" about my name.

Facts: I know you dislike them, Gen, because they always seem to get in the way of you "spinning" words.

Yes you did ridicule that young girl who lost her life. You did so by merely making a mention of it, then lying to your readers about how long I knew her. There is no excuse in the world to even bring that up, and you should know this. You attempted to put a perverted SPIN to my relationship with that girl and her mother. And that, Gen, is sickening and despicable. But you're too mentally sick and twisted to comprehend that. 

That girl and her mother were not people I just met once for five minutes. For you to even say that shows how evil you really are. There was absolutely no reason for you to go there. And it shows just how little you know me. I knew that woman and her kids for three years. What part of THREE YEARS do you not understand? How dare you to presume you know anything about my life or personal relationships? And then spew off from the mouth about it? And on top of that, to insinuate something perverted? You do this a lot, Gen. You talk about pedophilia quite a bit. The only people I could ever imagine talking about pedophilia as much as you do are people who engage in that kind of thing. People like me expose people like that, just like I did with the sexual role play groups on Goodreads. Then again, you never believed the evidence that I presented in that post. Too bad I didn't stumble into the group you were a member of. I assume you participate in that kind of thing by the way you are so adamant to dismiss the evidence. (Another behavioral trait of someone who is guilty - or so I have read.) 

And you show no class or compassion by mentioning it. And I don't give a rats ass what you do for a living or how you spend your time when I say that. A fact is a fact. And while we're on the subject of proof, where is your proof that I only met that woman and her daughters one time in a gas station as you claim? Where Gen? If you knew me and my life so well, then surely when you say that you can present evidence to back it up, right?

That's what I thought.

And you did insinuate that maybe my mother doesn't exist. That would mean that I don't have a mother. You said, and I quote yet again: "Or maybe his mother doesn't really exist?" - End of quote. (Just read the bottom of the next screenshot.)

You see, you did insinuate that. Case closed.

And as for why my age and relatives didn't show up in your web search / stalking of me, how the hell am I suppose to know? Now I'm responsible for what others put out there for the world to see? And quite frankly Gen, the fact that "Carroll Bryant" even showed up at all in your stalking of me, I mean, your web search of me, must indicate that I am using that name on official documents to some capacity, otherwise, "Carroll Bryant" wouldn't even show up at all in a stalking, I mean, web search. How is it that someone like you can't figure that out? I would think that if it is an alias, then nothing at all would show up. The fact that it does show up is more proof than not that it's not an alias, and that I am using that name. 

There you go again, Gen, "thinking" again. Just because you "think" you know me isn't proof that you know me. If you know so much about me then why is it that you can't even tell us all my "real" name? Or the last name of my best friend here where I live? Or what kind of car(s) I drive? Better yet, (and this is easy) when I will be going back to the studio to work on my songs? Or even what the new song is called? (I announced it on my Facebook) If you know me so much, then what are the first names of my sister(s) and brother(s)? Or even my mother for that mother? (Assuming I have a mother) I bet you don't even know my favorite sports teams, do you? Hell, Gen, you know me so much, how come it is that you don't even know my age? 

Or is it that you do know all of this stuff but just choose not to reveal it? Of course, for you to know any of that stuff would indicate the lengths you have gone to "uncover" who I really am, and that in itself would be fact of how much you stalk me. And are obsessed with me. Tell me Gen, why are these things about me so important to you? Why is so important for you to let everyone know how much you know me or of me when I have released so little online about me? For you to know anything more than what I have revealed publicly, would show how obsessed you are with me, wouldn't it? Because I don't know you except for what I know through your hate blog. And I don't want to know you anymore than that, and even more truthful, I don't want you to know anything personal about me because you're a sociopath who is a danger to me. You and your bully friends. 

So come on Gen, you say you know so much about me when I have told you absolutely nothing, and revealed so little online, how is then that you know me so well? Please, confess. If your claim isn't proof enough that you have been stalking me, then I don't know what is. With all of this having been said, how is it that you think you know me so well? Either you are lying about knowing me, or you are confessing to having stalked me for so long that you know everything about me. Which is it? 

You say I do not supply any real evidence to support my claim that my legal name is Carroll Bryant. But on the flip side, you haven't provided any evidence that it isn't. And why is it that you think I owe you or anyone proof of my real legal name? And why is it so important to you? And why won't you supply any real evidence of your identity. Tell you what, since you brought it up and since it's so important to you, why don't you reveal who you really are, and prove it, then I will do the same. How's that for a deal? That would end this argument. Or do you need a few weeks to create a new fake identity? *Wink, wink* Gotcha! 

How do my own words and actions prove that I am lying about you stalking me? First, I just explained that you are by your own admission that "you know me" so well. Secondly, the post you reference, "Facts, rumors and speculation" that you wrote and posted on January 10th, 2013 was about three weeks before I started "The Glass". (And you're talking about me announcing on MY blog (my personal internet space) the situation at that time regarding why STGRB went off line. And they went off line because of you and Angela Horn complaining to their host and getting them shut down. (How is that not you stalking STGRB or Athena again?) And then you post a screenshot from MY blog (my personal online space) of my announcement. How is that not stalking me again?

Of course, in the end, STGRB didn't go away, did it, Gen? Your feeble attempts and those of your co-conspirators, failed miserably, didn't you? So what lie again was I saying in that post? What lie do you actually think I was saying? The fact is, that post actually shows you doc dropping Athena Parker. That's all it shows. I know you will say it's a matter of public record, but the fact that YOU went to so much trouble to "dig" it up shows your resolve to stalk people. 

As for me providing evidence that you stalk me, I have already done that in the "GenX Says" series by showing the emails you sent me. By the fact that you sent unwanted emails to Athena, even after she blocked your first email - you sent her more emails from a different email account. Normally, when somebody blocks you, it means they don't want you emailing them. Apparently, that concept is lost on a self entitled bully like yourself, isn't it? 

More proof of you stalking me can be found in your owns words that you claim to "know" me so well. To know me so well would mean you had to go a whole lot of searching on me. That alone pretty much constitutes "stalking" a person. 

As for my "counsel", ditto. Have your attorney contact me anytime. I would love hear from him or her. I would love to settle this in court with you one day. I really would. I'm sure you know my number. After all, you know me so well.  (Your words, not mine.)

Your delusions are more serious than once thought. You do not have a "good name". Neither does Athena. You're both fakes and frauds. And I have not been trying to "destroy" her, she's been trying to destroy me. (And like you, failing at it miserably.) The fact is, you two could be twins. As for me thinking you are Amanda Welling, if I thought for a moment that you weren't her, I would have taken down all the posts about her in a heartbeat. I guess we will never know the truth for as long as you hide behind the Gen Xavier mask, now will we? But unlike you, I don't really give a rats ass. Which would explain why I don't go web searching for that information. I only took it that you were Amanda because of a post you did that connected you two. That and the fact that she always seemed to have her chubby ole head shoved up your chubby ole ass all the time when you first popped onto the scene. Where there's smoke, there's fire. 

And honestly, Gen, discredit you by associating you with Amanda? Trust me, we all know her name is about as good as yours and Athena's. But I will say this much for her, at least she uses her real name. You and Athena don't even have that much going for you. (And fine, if you want to say that i don't use my real name either, knock yourself out. I'm sure you will say it.) *Yawn*

And here's a word up: I'm not trying to work any strategy. If I wanted to go after you or Athena, you wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell. If I really wanted to end this thing with you that you started, it would have been over a long time ago. but here's the thing, you are no threat to me. Neither is Athena. But as far as finding my ass with both hands, you only need a finger. It's that big! (I'm sure.) Just like your head and ego. 

I still don't know what Fox News has to do with anything. Who gives a shit about Fox News or even MSN for that matter? I clicked on it. Big deal? So some blowhard has a problem with Fox News. If I would put my mind to it, and if I gave a rats ass, I could come up with 30 reasons why Rachel Maddow, Bob Beckel and MSN are illegitimate. What does politics have to do with this? The answer of course, is nothing. And FYI Gen, we never met. You pushed yourself into my world. You stalked me. (Still do) To have met would indicate we know each other, and I don't know you except for the garbage you write about me, and you don't know me except for what you read on my blogs. (Unless you stalked me to find personal information.) 

Okay Gen, I will show you it's a real email .... just as soon as you tell me why and how it is any of your damn business. And why it's so important for you to know? Okay?

 Really Gen? You have never treated me inhumanly? So I guess calling people pedophiles on your hate blog for all the world to see, without providing evidence to back it up isn't treating someone inhumane? Really? I have no police record. You have no screenshots of me talking inappropriately with under aged girls. There is nothing on the internet that would indicate I partake in such a horrible thing. And this is business as usual to you? Are you so fucking stupid that you don't see the damage something like that causes when you say it? Jesus Christ girl, you need some serious mental help. You have never presented one screenshot that would indicate I partake in such a thing, but that has never stopped you or your bully thug friends to accuse me of it. Jesus Christ Gen, you are fucking retarded. 

And yes, it does make you an it. Because to say that kind of bullshit lie indicates you have no morals or values what so ever. You are an "it". There is no mistake about that. You are not human. You are a monster. I'm still trying to figure out why you even emailed me from out of the blue. Why you attacked me when you opened your blog. I am not the one who sought you out, you sought me out. And you and your hateful monster bully friends have called me a rapist, a pedophile, a racist, you name it. How is any of that shit humane? 

You're evil Gen. You are an "it". Is that clear enough for you?

It cost me nothing. More than you realize. Or did you just threaten me? 

I never said that I wanted you to die. I said "evil" never dies. How is this not you "spinning words" again? But I will say this, when you do eventually die, and we all will at some point, the world will be a much safer place to live. And I didn't make an enemy out of you, you pushed your way into my world as an enemy. When someone I don't know just walks up to me and calls me a pedophile right out of the gate, then yeah, they must be an enemy. Now capture that screenshot and spin it as you will. You know you want to. But you still haven't told me what evidence you seek or why you are entitled to it. I still don't know why you're entitled to know any truth about my name, or why you are entitled to know anything about me. Perhaps when you explain to me why you are entitled to this, maybe I will tell you everything. But as of yet, I don't know why you're entitled to know anything about me. So why don't you come to this blog post and leave your reasons for me as to why you think you're entitled to know any personal information about me. 

Let's play, "Whose Business Is It Anyway?" - We'll start with Gen Xavier as our first contestant. Okay Gen, you want to see proof of my real name? Fine, but first, tell me why it is "any of your business?" - Leave that answer here in my comments section. 

And next, we get to see Gen being the "it" monster again as she lies about something she claims I said. 

I did not say that i made a habit out of buying candy for a strangers children at a gas station, Gen, you said that. And you said it because you're a lying bitch. A monster. You only say it to try and hurt me but what you don't realize because you're so goddamn stupid is - it hurts you. It hurts your name. I don't have to discredit you, you discredit yourself. And if you know me so well as you claim, then you would know I drive a car(s). And if you want me to post my drivers license online, then fine, I will .... right after you do it too. Or is it that you just want to know where I live so you can come and stalk me here? Yeah, that's it isn't it? You just want to know so much about me so you can stalk me in real life. I see your angle now. But again, I have to ask, what business is it of yours to know anything about me? I don't get that part. What makes you so special and entitled that you feel as if you have to know everything about me? 

What you already know about Gen. 

She has called me a pedophile. 

That screenshot proves her a liar. 

You say you're not Jude's buddy, Gen? Okay. Let's see what the screenshot says.

That screenshot (and the truth) can be seen right here.

That's two lies, Gen. Care to go for the TRIFECTA?

I didn't accuse you, Gen, I just merely suspect it was you. Big difference. All I said was, that they told me the call appeared to come from Canada. And then I asked if you were from Canada. But I like how you put your spin to it. More importantly, I like how you showed the screenshot of what I said to prove your lie. Oh wait, you didn't post the screenshot of what I said, did you? Maybe that's why I felt compelled to post it here for you. And the reason why you didn't post it was because then you couldn't say it. The screenshot would have proved you to be a liar. I like how you cleverly left it off your post. 

That's three lies right there, Gen. Read it and weep. 

How's that for showing evidence? 

Facts: An enemy of Gen Xavier. 

And calling me a pedophile isn't defamation? Tell you what, Gen, have your lawyer call me. Better yet, just file your defamation lawsuit as soon as you can. I'll counter that lawsuit with one of my own and then we'll see what a court says, okay? And hey, if you think you or any of your friends are bad-ass enough to kick my backside, take your best shot. I look forward to it. The only thing best removed is your hate blog. Your lies. Your defamation. And certainly, your stupidity. 

And here is Gen talking about how amazing she is. 

I have a charity in mind that you can sponsor, Gen. How about the one that helps mentally retarded people? You can use all the donations you can get. But hey, at least you admit to being a compassion-less bitch. That is the only honest thing you said in your whole entire "update" post. 

Now if you all will excuse me, I have to go get my "backside" kicked. 

Wait a tick! What am I thinking? Gen is going to kick my backside for me. Guess that means my schedule is free for the day. I think I'll take in a baseball game. And if you want to know which game I will be watching, ask Gen, she knows me. (You're still a zebra, Gen)

I'm Carroll Bryant ..... and this is still The Looking Glass. 

(And my backside has still yet to be kicked.)